![]() |
|
April 14, 2003
a 7,000 year old text or a seven year old child?
There's a lot of hand-wringing over the looting of Iraqi museums. I know that Iraq is the cradle of civilization. If I hadn't known it before, I certainly would have been well schooled in the history of the area by the time I helped my daughter finish her project on that very subject last year. Sure, I am saddened over the loss of 7,000 years worth of history as a result of the looting. However, I am more saddened by the looting and plundering of the lives and dignity of the people of Iraq by Saddam Hussein. Wednesday was the day for killing and Thursday was the day relatives paid to collect the bodies of the dead. How prisoners were executed depended on an order from above – a bullet to the back of the head for those deemed to deserve a degree of mercy and the rope for those destined to suffer. On Thursdays, the relatives of the dead came to collect the bodies of their loved ones. They could only do so if they paid for the bullets that were used in their deaths. George Bush did not loot and plunder the museums. The people of Iraq did. And while you may cry and lash out over the loss of texts and golds and cuniform - and that's understandable - to value those things over the loss of life is foolish. And to not see why the museum was looted is to be blind to what is really going on. The people of Iraq who have rioted and ransacked and carted away plush chairs and silk draperies from the palaces of Saddam, the people who ran into the stores and museums and took what they could get, they were reacting. They were letting go of years of repression and bitterness and anger. If we are placing blame, let it be on Saddam. It is not the fault of the troops, who were busy fighting down the opposition. It is not the fault of Rumsfeld. It is the fault of a regime that made its people feel worthless, degraded and inhuman. Pictures of dead Iraqis, with their necks slashed, their eyes gouged out and their genitals blackened, fill a bookshelf. Jail cells, with dried blood on the floor and rusted shackles bolted to the walls, line the corridors. And the screams of what could be imprisoned men in an underground detention center echo through air shafts and sewer pipes. I found this comment on the weblog post linked above: [the loss of museum artifacts] is worse than killing people, and you are right to grieve more. When you kill a person, you snuff out the whole universe that is in their head, who they are, what they know, and all the potential of what they could be and do. But they will, eventually, die anyway: everyone dies. You've killed them and made that happen sooner. It's a terrible thing, but it's within the way things happen. I'm sorry, but I cannot subscribe to that way of thinking. I do not place the value of things over people. There are people grieving over the loss of the museum pieces. Crying, unable to work or concentrate. I want to know if they cried for the toddlers in Saddam's prisons. I want to know if they cried for the women who were raped as punishment or the men who were dipped in acid. Did they cry for the children who starved to death while Saddam spent his food for oil money on a golden bidet and mirrored ceilings in his bedroom? A physical record of the history of civilization has been lost due to the looting. Yes, a very sad, depressing thought. I would not trade life of a human being for one of those urns or parchments. I would not trade the liberation of millions of suffering people for a single book or piece of art. I would not trade the children that were set free from their prison forany single item that is now gone from that museum. I pity you if you would. addendum For more on this, see Dr. Weevil. Read all the comments. It is my contention, as it is that of many others, that the looting of the museum was an inside job (it has been reported that the vaults were opened up) and thus could not have been stopped from the outside. I also believe that the goods stolen were not taken out and stomped on or crushed or destroyed in anger; they were taken by people who knew the worth of these items and intend to sell them on the black market. They will turn up again. Maybe not soon, but they will. This is not an either/or/both situation. My main problem with the people who have been mourning the loss of the antiquities and historical documents is that it is all they are mourning. Comments
well said Posted by: alex at April 14, 2003 07:40 PMNot all of us are only concerned about the loss of priceless books and artifacts. If I were going to invade Baghdad, I certainly would have considered the fact that there would be looting, and I would have foreseen that places with things of value would be the main targets. This should have been foreseen and to whatever extent possible prevented. This isn't just "hand-wringing." Things like this are a loss to the whole world. Even if that doesn't work for you, a more pragmatic concern is that this makes us look bad. Posted by: Lonewacko at April 14, 2003 08:47 PMhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,709809,00.html Germany and France (and Britain) make the looters of today look like pikers. They took a whole city! Posted by: CJ at April 14, 2003 09:32 PMI was going to post a link to all the google hits for 'elgin marbles'. It's things like this that people tend to remember for decades. And, remember we're supposed to be better than Fergamy. Posted by: Lonewacko at April 14, 2003 09:44 PMOK, they looted the palaces and houses of the Tikrit Thugs. They looted the government offices. No big deal. The museum, an inside job. Probably the biggest whiner has the most stuff. You wanna see looting? Check out anything about Los Angeles after Rodney King or Watts in 1965 (?). This wasn't much more than what happened the other night when the Minnisota Gophers won the college hockey championship. Posted by: Chuck at April 14, 2003 10:16 PMMuch of the looting is human greed but some may be rage against the regime. In addition to being in control of all the cultural institutions like the libraries and museums, Hussein and his gang controlled over 100 different companies and had monopolies over important consumer, industrial and agricultural commodities. I wonder how many businesses that had nothing to do with Saddam and the Tikriti crowd got looted. Posted by: ronnie schreiber at April 14, 2003 11:44 PMAt the time of the L.A. riots (what some persist in terming an "uprising"), I had fires a mile southwest, a mile southeast, and a mile to the north (Samy's Camera, which burning I still wonder about). I have no sympathy whatsoever for any rioters. However, most of the looting was of minor things like TVs and Pampers. If the residents of Baghdad want to grab some Pampers, well, I'm not going to be too concerned about it. But, if we're going to allow this as a way a good ol' fashioned street justice and settling of scores, well, that's a real big problem. And, if we're going to allow the looting of priceless artifacts, well, that's a real big problem. There's also the matter of looters taking secret police files. Pampers, OK. But, destroying ancient, handwritten manuscripts and taking items which could have been used for intelligence gathering? That indicates a problem. Posted by: Lonewacko at April 15, 2003 01:36 AMLonewacko: Who said anything about destroying artifacts? They were stolen, not destroyed, and they were stolen because they were valuable. Hell, most of them are probably being held by museum employees who know just how to care for them (and what they are worth to Saudi princes). Many of the museums artifacts were looted in slow motion by Saddam, who was selling them off for cash. Where are the tears for that? Posted by: T. Hartin at April 15, 2003 07:51 AMThe "destroying" was referring to the library fire. "Many of the museums artifacts were looted in slow motion by Saddam, who was selling them off for cash. Where are the tears for that?" Saddam is bad, right? We're supposed to be better than Saddam, right? That means that to whatever extent possible we should have made sure that the museums and libraries and other cultural repositories were safe. Posted by: Lonewacko at April 15, 2003 03:15 PMPost a comment
|