![]() |
|
April 02, 2003
"Bulgaria's Iraq Dilemma"
From this:
But on the eve of the conflict, despite having confirmed its support for the United States-led war, Bulgaria's name was missing from the first list of the "coalition of the willing"... Public opinion here remains divided. Some object to the war in Iraq and America's use of force in principle, while others defend US policy as pro-active and as a guarantee of future stability and economic prosperity... Most people in the media, academia and business believe support for the US is equivalent to future NATO membership for Bulgaria, which they see as a pre-condition for entry into the EU. Leading journalists, university lecturers and new businessmen are anxious about the outcome of the war but convinced the risk is worth taking... Others are more cynical and believe the government is blindly following American policy, driven by the hope of receiving a reward from the US and a role in Iraq's post-war reconstruction... But Bulgaria will also soon be reminded that it lies in the heart of the Balkans and is geographically and historically connected to Europe. It cannot afford to follow Donald Rumsfeld into a lasting conflict with the "old Europe", centred on Germany and France. Posted By Lonewacko at April 2, 2003 12:52 AM | TrackBackComments
is this reluctance linked to the old ties with the Soviet Union and hence today with Russia and their pro Iraq client? Posted by: aYk at April 2, 2003 03:11 AMFrom what I've read in Robert Kaplan's "Balkan Ghosts," the Bulgarians (and just about everyone else the region) seem more worried about Russia than Old Europe. Right now, stronger ties Old Europe doesn't look as sexy or as effective at foiling Russian expansionism as increased ties to the United States do. Posted by: Achariyth at April 2, 2003 11:09 AMPost a comment
|