The Command Post
Iraq
March 17, 2005
An Unseemly Execution In Iran

This was also posted on Joe Gandelman's blog The Moderate Voice.

Yes, you could say it's barbaric — but you could also say that it might act as a deterrent.
An Iranian accused of murdering at least 20 kids was executed in front of a large crowd in a most unnice way that might make other child killers in Iran give it at least a passing thought:

Mohammad Bijeh, 24, dubbed "the Tehran desert vampire" by Iran's press, was flogged 100 times before being hanged.

A brother of one of his young victims stabbed him as he was being punished. The mother of another victim was asked to put the noose around his neck.

The execution took place in Pakdasht south of Tehran, near where Bijeh's year-long killing spree took place.

The killer was hoisted about 10 metres into the air by a crane and slowly throttled to death in front of the baying crowd.

Hanging by a crane - a common form of execution in Iran - does not involve a swift death as the condemned prisoner's neck is not broken.
Hanging by crane? Gee, I didn't think those birds were that tall. But we digress:
The killer collapsed twice during the punishment, although he remained calm and silent throughout.

Spectators, held back by barbed wire and about 100 police officers, chanted "harder, harder" as judicial officials took turns to flog Bijeh's bare back before his hanging.

Bijeh was stabbed by the 17-year-old brother of victim Rahim Younessi, AFP reported, as he was being readied to be hanged.

Officials then invited the mother Milad Kahani to put the blue nylon rope around his neck.

The crimes of Mohammed Bijeh and his accomplice Ali Baghi had drawn massive attention in the Iranian media.

They reportedly tricked children to go with them into the desert south of Tehran by saying they were going to hunt animals. They then poisoned or knocked their victims out, sexually abused them and buried them in shallow graves.

"Hey, what about rehabilitation?" All murders are contemptible but kid killing is the lowest of the low.

Attorney Eugene Volokh writes:"I like civilization, but some forms of savagery deserve to be met not just with cold, bloodless justice but with the deliberate infliction of pain, with cruel vengeance rather than with supposed humaneness or squeamishness. I think it slights the burning injustice of the murders, and the pain of the families, to react in any other way. And, yes, I know this aligns me in this instance with the Iranian government — but even a stopped clock is right twice a day, and in this instance the Iranians are quite correct."

Yes, seriously: what could be worse than seeing a young life snuffed out before it has a chance to live due to some sick sadistic or sexual needs of an adult? There are several people killed when a kid is butchered: the kid, the siblings and the parents. Scott Peterson should consider himself lucky he doesn't live in Iran.

Posted By Joe Gandelman at March 17, 2005 04:47 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I'd be a little more relaxed about this if I had any faith in the judicial process in Iran, which, for instance, regularly sanctions the murder of dissident activists for crimes against the revolution, and raped girl-children for having committed 'adultery'.

That said, I'm also not convinced that violent retribution is a positive thing for the souls who commit or witness it. Best to let the men charged with seeing justice done do it quickly and quietly (out behind the woodshed), out of sight, and let those who grieve for the loss of their loved one not be expected to stain their hands with the blood of the murderer.

Posted by: J. R. Pascucci [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 17, 2005 05:42 PM

J.R. -

I agree that this execution was probably followed by another how just happened to make a snide remark against the Mullahs. However, as barbaric as this act was, I can think of nothing better for those who would hurt a child. Well, Okay, I can think of better things to inflict on those people but this is a family forum.

While I agree that the behavior on the part of the families probably isn't best for their psyche in the long run I can't say that I wouldn't do the same thing or worse. God help the poor bastard that hurts the kids in my family. He/she/it would be begging for a trip through the Iranian Justice System.

Posted by: Wayne Fielder [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 18, 2005 08:54 PM

A deterrent? As anyone can see here, it obviously did no good to deter those in the crowd. The only one deterred from a capital crime was the condemned.


One can also question such condemnation. Islamofascism is big on thinking "the accusation is sufficient evidence". How can the Iranian law enforcers be certain that Bijeh was the murderer? Have they become so eager to get someone for these horrible crimes, that they decided to get just anyone?


And since Joe mentions Scott Peterson, I'll go ahead and mention Terri Schindler, now dying based on the testimony of one man, with no objective evidence. I guess Michael Schiavo would be a hero to the Taliban.

Posted by: gus3 [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 20, 2005 12:25 PM

I witnessed an execution in the UAE. The cliche that witnessing an execution takes away from one's hummanity is just that a cliche without merit.

While I agree the Mullah's are quick to resort to this sort of treatment and their standards for proof and evidence is lacking in many instances my guess is they got the right guy and that guy got exactly what he deserved.

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius [TypeKey Profile Page] at March 24, 2005 11:43 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?