The Command Post
Iraq
November 02, 2004
Media Watch Briefing: 2004-11-02

As the Scotsman noted in the wake of Rathergate:

"Bloggers cannot replace newspapers and the television networks since they rely on the established media to do most of a story’s original reporting. But they can answer the question "who watches the watchers?" The answer is that the pyjama-wearers do."

Today is election day in the USA. Here's a look that steps beyond the candidates to take a hard look at the media - in the USA, and beyond.

TOP TOPICS

  • Guess who CBS News picks to handle its election night 2004 coverage, in the wake of Rathergate? Why, Dan Rather, of course.
  • The Center for Media and Public Affairs did a survey of press coverage this campaign - here's the full report in PDF. It says that [1] Kerry received the most positive press coverage of ANY candidate since 1980; [2] Bush's coverage was much more negative, but not the worst during this period (Reagan's was, in 1984, when Mondale has the previous top press rating); [3] The major network praised Kerry, while FOX News buried him. (Hat Tip: Instapundit)

Other Topics Include: Media partisanship stats; Empty headed journalism; Poll shennanigans; Opening the records; LA Times dishonesty; Election contributions; Slant-O-Meter; Fager & cBS; BBC on blogs; BBC cries for Arafat; CBC exposed; Euro press bias; Osama's tape; Covering hate in Germany; Duelfer report; al Qaqaa.


Continue Reading "Media Watch 2004-11-02"

Posted By Winds of Change.NET at November 2, 2004 04:06 AM | TrackBack
Comments

.1 penny per key stroke today..think I could retire..course the better half would have to get a part time job..;-))..hey how many zeros does a gazillon have..

Posted by: Rob_NC [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2004 08:52 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?