The Command Post
Iraq
October 20, 2004
Never Again

Last week I posted an essay by a friend, a liberal Jewish New Yorker who is voting for Bush. You can read it here. My friend has more to say.
-- Judith Weiss

Never Again

“Never again.”

As Jews, we teach these sacred words to our children.

We raise millions of dollars and build Holocaust museums throughout the country to spread the message.

We form committees, spearhead educational initiatives, and aggressively reach out to the non-Jewish world to lecture them about their moral responsibility to fight anti-Semitism.

Do we then turn around and vote for the candidate who’s allied with forces intent on Jewish destruction?

Yasser Arafat has endorsed John Kerry.

So has Mahathir Mohamed, the ex-Prime Minister of Malaysia. You remember him. Last year, he hosted the Organization of the Islamic Conference, where he said, “Today the Jews rule the world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them.” and “1.3 billion Muslims can not be defeated by a few million Jews.” He urged his audience of Arab leaders “to plan, to strategize and then to counterattack,” and they leapt to their feet in an ecstatic standing ovation.

These endorsements by Jew-haters and Jew-murderers are not meaningless background noise, as some would you have believe.

They are the logical outgrowth of John Kerry’s avowed foreign policy.

John Kerry says American actions must pass “a global test”, a test which Israel conspicuously fails.

He believes the central organ of our foreign policy must be the United Nations, whose General Assembly voted that “Zionism is racism”, and which in 2003, passed eighteen resolutions condemning Israel for human rights violations, and only four resolutions condemning other countries. Of the ten emergency special sessions convened by the General Assembly, six have focused on accusing Israel. And in the vast U.N. bureaucracy, Israel is the only country subject to permanent monitoring for human rights abuses.

Kerry feels the most important foreign power we must please is France, whose Ambassador called Israel “that sh-tty little country” and which this year successfully marshaled all twenty-five European Union members into voting against Israel’s life-saving security fence in the United Nations.

Martin Peretz writes “I’ve searched to find one time when Kerry - even candidate Kerry - criticized a U.N. action or statement against Israel. I’ve come up empty. Nor has he defended Israel against the European Union’s continuous hectoring.”

Of the 5,156 words, John Kerry spoke at his acceptance speech at the Democratic Convention, exactly 0 was about Israel.

He may try to duck this inconvenient topic, secure in his belief that American Jews vote Democratic, no matter how much the result may go against their own interests.

But we cannot duck it, for this is no ordinary time.

The next four years may well determine whether Israel survives or perishes in a nuclear holocaust.

The mad mullahs of Iran are hotly pursuing nuclear weapons, even as the United Nations issues half-hearted statements of “concern” and sends ineffectual inspectors. Experts say Iran will rapidly achieve the capability of reaching Israel, probably within the next year.

John Kerry has already allied himself with Iran’s current regime. His campaign sent an email to Iran’s official news agency, Mehr News, stating his plan to “repair the damage done” by President Bush’s policies and to “build new friendships and overcome tensions.”

So as the mullahs stage giant military parades of Shihab-3 ballistic missiles festooned with banners reading “We shall crush America under our feet” and “Israel must be wiped off the map”, Kerry proposes to provide Iran with lightly-enriched uranium to “test” whether the mullahs were “actually looking for it for peaceful purposes.” And if the mullahs fail his global test? Kerry suggests….(drum roll please)… a summit.

Ah yes. The delegates will gather in a lovely chateau outside of Paris, dining on fine wines and cheese, debating exactly how to word this week’s expression of “grave concern”, as the nuclear bomb hits Jerusalem. Shaking their heads, these bureaucratic pooh-bahs will sigh at the Jews’ historic propensity to attract trouble, and then philosophically return to their brie.

Too extreme? You don’t believe Kerry really sides with the mullahs? Then listen to The Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran, a brave group of student activists working inside and outside of Iran. On October 8, they issued a statement condemning Kerry, noting that “John Kerry is proving himself to be an ally of those seeking to impede internal revolution which would draw to a close the era of Islamo-Fascist mullahcracy.”

These students believe that Kerry’s pro-mullah policy is influenced by three of his top fund-raisers, Hussun Nemazee, Faraj Aalaei, and Susan Akbarpour, all Iranian-Americans with close ties to the current regime. Nemazee has actively tried to destroy the student group, launching a ten million dollar suit against them in the hope of shutting it down.

But perhaps Kerry is more influenced by love than money: His wife, Theresa Heinz Kerry, has publicly scolded President Bush for his stern warnings to Teheran. Specifically in regard to Iran, she said, “The way we live in peace in a family, in a marriage, in the world is not by threatening, not by showing off your muscles. It’s by listening, by giving a hand sometimes, by being intelligent and being open, and setting high standards.”

So there you have it.

Kerry is endorsed by Yasser Arafat, whose hands are dripping with Jewish blood, including that of New Jersey’s own beautiful daughters, Sara Duker and Alisa Flatow.

Kerry is endorsed by Mahathir Mohamed, who spreads classic Jew-hatred from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, in hopes of rousing Arab leaders to even greater destructive fury.

Kerry is endorsed by leading supporters of the mullahs of Iran, who even as we speak, are putting the finishing touches on their nuclear weapons and pointing them at Jerusalem.

Despite all this evidence, you may continue to say, “Well, Kerry would be good for Israel. Bush is bad for the Jews because now everyone hates us.”

Then let me ask you to consider the opinion of those most vulnerable to the results of your vote: our six million brothers and sisters in Israel. Their families are dying in pizza parlors, school busses and seder tables. Their sons are marching off to war. Their children are suffering in hospitals, in burn units, in rehab wards.

Israelis support President Bush 3 to 1. In that fractious, divided, argumentative society, there is as close to universal agreement as you will ever find: Kerry is the wrong candidate. In a horrifically dangerous time, President Bush is the one to protect them.

So if you wish, go ahead and vote for Senator Kerry. But if you do, I have one request:

Please do not send in your check to your local Holocaust Museum or Tolerance Center.

Abandon writing your ground-breaking curriculum on Lessons of the Holocaust.

Do not write incensed letters to the editor about the rise of Holocaust denial.

Stay home on Yom Ha’Shoah and catch up with your laundry or pay your bills.

Our six million dead are silent in the grave, with no need of your indignation and tears.

Our six million brothers and sisters in Israel - and vulnerable Jewish communities everywhere, including here - are alive, alone, and desperate for you to hear their cry:

Never again.

Never again.

Never again.

UPDATE: Judith here. I just want to add this scenario by Charles Krauthammer.

Posted By at October 20, 2004 10:59 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Damn, reading this made me really angry and frustrated!

I am a black man in the US and I feel the same way about the Jewish-American support of Kerry and also the African-American support of Kerry - Jews and Blacks.

Posted by: Agrippa [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 21, 2004 08:25 AM

..Agrippa,I feel your pain..but,patience my freind..there are those that are standing with you and we will not go back....."WE WILL OVERCOME".....
...this made my day...


George "Winston" Bush or John "Chamberlain" Kerry

For your information I send you my Mail for President George W. Bush which includes my statements to the topics Iraq and US-elections.

Sincerely,

Rainer Hackl
Nordendstrasse 49, 63225 Langen, Germany

----- Original Message -----
From: Rainer Hackl
To: GeorgeWBush.com
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 9:16 AM
Subject: four more years or four lost years


Dear Mr. President,

the only king in a democracy is the argument. When this is the truth, you and the Vicepresident have won all debates on TV. Kerry and his fans are not able to distinguish between more important an less important arguments. You have been the first politician to lead the world into a complete new direction after the cold war and after the massiv attacks of terror. Nobody could expect, that anyone could be able, to find the right way so quickly as you did. And nobody could really expect, that the first step in the right direction could have been done without any difficulties. Your courage has saved many lives in the whole world, nevertheless the terrorists could not been stoped completely by now.

The growing of the American economie and subsequently the growing of the world economie is the result of your work. Many Americans and many citizens in the world, including Mr. Schroeder in Germany, would have lost their jobs without the growing industrie in your country. These are the historical facts, which will last, whatever Kerry says, and nevertheless Schroeder will never thank you for that.

Hitler, the soviet empire and Saddam Hussein were stoped by the USA and their Commanders in Chief. A nation can be proud about leaders like that. But one man and his thinktank has not been stoped, nevertheless he is dead. Please don't laugh, when I say, the name of his company is Karl Marx & Co. He was a brilliant sociologist, but he was also one of the fathers of modern fascism. To my mind this is one important conclusion from the politics of the last centurie.

This conclusion would not be so interesting, when a big part of the so called progressiv politicians still would not be the intellectual childs of Karl Marx theories. For example "Blood for oil" or the words of Kerry "you are just working for the rich" are polemics, which could have been created by Karl Marx himself. He and his company were already the real producers of many arguments against the American way of life and the free world.

The politics of Schroeder and Fischer and other so called "old Europeans" would have not been thinkable without the background of the theories of Karl Marx & Co (and that is the reason, why they are real "old Europeans"). And the talks of Kerry reminds me very much of what Schroeder and Fischer are talking about. Like Marx could not have been able to understand, that he will be the producer of arguments for the terror of Stalin & Co, Kerry, Schroeder and Fischer are not able to understand, that they are playing the game of the terrorists and are producing arguments not only against you but against America and the whole free world. But this threat could only be hit by arguments, and maybe it will take the same periode of time to solve this problem than the war against terror will last.

The people needed some time, to understand, why Churchill warned against Hitler. Especially the people in "old Europe" will need some time too, to understand, why you warned against Bin Laden. To my mind this comparison shows the real qualities of your politics. And I hope, in "old Europe" the process of understanding the threat will not take too much time and will not cost too much victims. The question for America and the whole world is, four more years for an effectiv war against terror or four lost years in the war against terror. And what will Kerry discuss with Schroeder and other "old Europeans", who are not willing and not able to help, when the real problem is Bin Laden? Will he talk to Bin Laden too? I just hope, I will never been able to understand Kerry and the other guys.

Good luck for your campaign.

Sincerely,

Rainer Hackl
Nordendstrasse 49, 63225 Langen, Germany


Comments posted by: Rainer Hackl at October 21, 2004 11:35 AM

Posted by: Rob_NC [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 21, 2004 09:26 AM

Kerry has nuanced
Never Again
into

Neville Again

Posted by: Dan Kauffman [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 21, 2004 08:27 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?