![]() |
|
September 09, 2004
The March 11 panel investigating the Madrid terror attacks
The March 11 Commission will have an extended schedule, it was agreed last Tuesday: The inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the Madrid terrorist massacre in which 191 people were killed decided Tuesday to hear from more witnesses.I know it sounds weird, but let me repeat: it's the Socialist party, now in power but in opposition at the time, who doesn't want Aznar to testify, even though he was the prime minister on that day. Neither it wants some other key figures, such as Ignacio Astarloa, the deputy Interior minister then and who was the person in charge of all the country's security apparatus, appearing before the panel. Can you imagine the Dems not wanting Bush or Tom Ridge on the 9-11 panel? I can't. Why is this happening? Well, first of all because any further explanation would make clearer that even though Aznar's government certainly was wrong at the end of the day about being ETA the author, it didn't lie (if Allah says it, it must be true, right? read his excellent post): everyone thought it was ETA at first, and even the pro-basque head of the Basque country government said so early in the morning. So did too several people who had been pushing for negotiation with the Basque terrorists, that is, people who were at least sympathetic to their cause. So the canard that Aznar "lied" or "mislead" on March 11 is just as silly as the "Bush lied about Saddam's WMDs" meme: the available intelligence at that time pointed unequivocally to ETA in the beggining, if only because they had tried twice an identical attack on trains in recent months. And Europol had warned about a possible big ETA attack before the election (in fact, it's been a regular feature). So though most terrorism experts all over the world. Unlike the myth that has been propagated all around, it was Angel Acebes, then Interior Minister in the Aznar cabinet, who, at 8.30 pm of the very same March 11 during a nationally televised press conference, talked about the van which was found with detonators and a tape with Koranic verses inside. As he did in several occasions during these days, as more information was available. No media organization broke the news that there was an Islamic clue, it was Aznar's government. The sensation that many people were getting that they were lied was due because the media (particularly the pro-Socialist leading media group PRISA, owner of the leading TV and radio networks, and the main newspaper, El País), were feeding false information and then blaming the government for not telling the truth. For example, a key moment was when the SER radio informed that according to three separate sources, a suicide bomber had been found in one of the trains but the government was covering it up. They even offered specific details like that the body was completely shaved and was wearing three sets of underwear, saying that this is what suicide bombers do. Of course, autopsies positively denied that there was any suicide bomber. Second, because even though we know who put the bombs on the trains, the guys were a bunch of low level crooks who couldn't have managed to do it without support and orders. And as of today, we still don't know who gave the orders. Third, because a collaboration between Arab terrorists and ETA cannot be ruled out. Not at all. Just as with Iraq, the so-called conventional wisdom is that Islamic fundamentalists wouldn't do anything with a secular group. However, this chasm in cosmovision and beliefs doesn't seem too much of a problem for the annual get together in Tehran, as Amir Taheri writes. Fourth, because several of the people now arrested for the bombings (most blew themselves up, as you probably know) were police snitches and claim to have been informing their 'liaisons' about some murky dynamite trade between workers in a mine in Northern Spain and some Arab guys. And they did nothing. On Monday, the newspaper El Mundo reported that the firearms used by the terrorists (the ones that they showed off in a video taking responsibility for the attack) had been sold by a police officer. Fifth, and most disturbing, is that these police officers who were the liaisons with the snitches had past links with the GAL, the secret shadowy group through with Socialist Prime Minister Felipe Gonzalez waged dirty war against ETA. I mean, it's the same guys who hired hitmen in Marseille to kidnap, torture and blow Basque terrorists up. Dunno, couldn't they hire a bunch of disgruntled Arabs living in Madrid, too? Trouble is that the current government doesn't have much incentive to investigate, and are not too interested in having more people testify at the commision; besides of what I wrote above, it keeps the March 11 alive reminding people that their victory is somewhat linked to the slain of 200 innocent Spaniards. Which means we may never know the truth. What I have written above is just to prepare your minds for this:Now, let me try my hand as a mediocre pulp fiction writer.Disturbing, eh? It may all be true. (First posted at Barcepundit in English; only some minor editing, on style and references to mentioned weekdays) Posted By Franco Aleman at September 9, 2004 04:31 AM | TrackBackComments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |