![]() |
|
September 02, 2004
The VodkaPundit Lives Up to His Name and Live Blogs the Speeches
Live Blogging Pataki: [make sure you keep refreshing for new posts]
Bush's problem with Cuban voters in Florida (who have been polling in his favor at around 66% rather than the 90% Bush won in 2000) might just have been solved. Of course, I'm still sober, so take all this with a rim of salt.
What are Bush's internal polls telling him about what's going on there?
Then Pennsylvania. I propose a new game. Every time Pataki mentions a Kerry-leaning battleground state, take a shot.
Also, it's time for the second beer. Should finish it just in time to mix a martini before Bush comes on.
"This is a candidate who has to Google his own name to find out where he stands."
"A boxcutter is a weapon of mass distruction." "It is good for the world that he is gone." Nice lines, all of them. BTW, I'm watching this unfiltered on INHD. The hi-def picture is gorgeous, but I'm "missing out" on the most of the crowd shots and commentary.
Pataki just summed up every reason (OK, the only reason) I'm voting for Bush in November. Probably for a lot of other RINOs, too.
.... [Bush portion]
Nice, but -- -- Bush is in trouble if the whole speech is a 9/11 tribute.
Red meat for the true-beleivers, but not much for the rest of the nation. Can we get to the REAL meat, please? I understand this is going to be a short speech.
But part of me is waiting for the other shoe to drop.
He's talking about the No Child Left Behind Act, which to my mind is a pretty useless and wasteful bit of law. But "nothing will hold us back" is developing into his theme tonight -- and it's a good one. It makes him sound less like an incumbent we might be tired of, and more like someone we wouldn't mind having around.
THAT is what I've wanted to hear all week. And he didn't, unlike Kerry, go through a laundry list of complaints and promises before getting to it. That's the advantage of incumbency. Break time -- need to pour the next drink.
He didn't have to say any names, did he?
I'm speaking here of politics, not of policy. And politically, it's swell.
Answering the question the folks at Reason.com have been asking, George Bush is giving libertarians like myself reasons to vote for him. Great reasons? Nope. But good enough. Tax simplification. Medical savings accounts. Some sort of privatization and ownership in all kinds of ways. Perfect? Nope. But better than Kerry, and, sadly, that's the best I can ask for.
Does anyone else see the dichotomy? If it's really local, make it LOCAL.
Just not sure if I was laughing with or at. Doesn't matter, though. What matters is, the guy looks comfortable, unlike Kerry's flop sweat last month. And if you didn't see Kerry flop sweat in Hi Def, be thankful.
Also, "we're not turning back." The folks at DU and elsewhere will have fun with it, but I think it will play well in the sane part of the nation.
Hate to tell you, but most people don't care. And if you REALLY beleive in judicial non-activism, what could be better than courts so overloaded that they can't decide on much?
Amen and pass me the third martini.
Finally, we have a sideways admission that Iraq wasn't about WMD. If he'd said that 18 months ago, he'd have saved himself a lot of grief.
Again, Bush didn't have to name names, did he?
Again, Iraq wasn't about WMD. "We owe you our thanks and we owe you something more..." But no matter what, it's a debt that cannot be fulfilled. I wish Bush had said that last bit. I really do.
Unless, you know, you're running against Howard Dean in Iowa. C'mon, George, give John a break.
All I can add is, thanks guys -- and can someone refill my drink, Mr Chirac?
No, really -- can someone refill my drink? We're getting into some good stuff, and I need another one.
Just once, once, I would like to hear Bush tell us Israel's fight is just another front in the Global War, and that's why we stand with them. [Ed note: Amen to that, Stephen]
Bush took on the NYT of today, by taking on the NYT of yesteryear, compaining about the post-WWII occupation of Germany. And unlike some, I have enough faith in the American people to GET IT.
That's another reason for libertarians to vote for Bush. Sure, he'll disappoint us. So will Kerry. But at least Bush will pay us a little lip service, which is about the best we can expect most days.
"Tonight I ask you to stand with me." He asked, and I'll tell: I'm gonna stand with this guy. I know I'll regret it later, but I also know I'd regret the other guy even more.
Forget the war. Forget policy. Forget everything but two men who want something from me. Kerry could never have made that joke (or the others Bush just made) at his own expense. Bush can, and did. That's a guy comfortable in his own skin, and that's a guy I'd give something to, before the other guy. I'm pretty sure a lot of people recognize that, even if only instinctively
I'm talking to my fellow libertarians out there when I tell you, at least Bush is willing to speak our language. Maybe I'm a sucker, but it gets me every time. Nuance? None. Backtracking? Zero. Calculation? There, probably, but undetectable. Tell me I'm not the only one who sees all that. Posted By Steve at September 2, 2004 08:55 PM | TrackBackComments
Holy cow, Steve. That has to be some of the most off-the-cuff, direct live-blogging I've ever seen
Posted by: gus3 "And unlike some, I have enough faith in the American people to GET IT."
Posted by: David C Precious:
Posted by: James Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |