The Command Post
Iraq
July 12, 2004
Operation "Buy Hitchens a Drink!"

Have you read Christopher Hitchens before, and wanted to show your appreciation? Well, our secret agents of Department 13 1/2 have been hard at work, and now you can do just that... by buying Hitch a drink, on the blogosphere!

Truly a fitting salute to our favourite leftist contrarian.

Here's the drill. We have a PayPal button set up below. Donating $5-10 to this campaign won't save the world or anything grandiose - just help buy Christopher Hitchens some bottles of Johnny Walker Red (his libation of choice). These will be delivered to Mr. Hitchens, along with a note of appreciation and thanks from the Blogosphere that will include all of the contributing bloggers and readers. Delivery will be handled by the aforementioned secret agents - and yes, we really can do it.

Over to you, ladies and gentlemen....

Posted By Winds of Change.NET at July 12, 2004 11:26 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Such skill, to keep that single ball in the air.

Posted by: dirk strom [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 06:57 AM

I guess there's a little General Sternwood in (nearly) all of us:

Philip Marlowe: Thanks for the drink, General.

General Sternwood: I enjoyed your drink as much as you did, sir.

Posted by: ter0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 08:35 AM


I think that the ought to consult with Mr. Hitchens first, to see if he might not prefer a nice single malt scotch instead.

Johnny Walker Red reminds me of the line in the Matrix "it's good for two things: degreasing engines and killing brain cells."

I have to admit I do admire Hitchens -- it takes a lot of courage to swim against the current, and he had been steadfast in his support of the removal of Saddam. I have no doubt, though, that he is truly a left-winger at heart, and his support of the war does not represent any type of conversion. I'm sure down the road I'll be cursing at him for something.

That being said, you have to admire the style of a man who goes onto a talk show, cigarette and drink in hand. He is a reminder of more civilized times.


Posted by: DWC [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 08:37 AM

Probably not converted in the political sense (although he recently confirmed to Bryan Lamb on C-Span that he is no longer a Socialist) nevertheless his as yet unmet challenge to Michael Moore is worth a tumbler or two of whatever he chooses:

Moore has announced that he won't even appear on TV shows where he might face hostile questioning. I notice from the New York Times of June 20 that he has pompously established a rapid response team, and a fact-checking staff, and some tough lawyers, to bulwark himself against attack. He'll sue, Moore says, if anyone insults him or his pet. Some right-wing hack groups, I gather, are planning to bring pressure on their local movie theaters to drop the film. How dumb or thuggish do you have to be in order to counter one form of stupidity and cowardice with another? By all means go and see this terrible film, and take your friends, and if the fools in the audience strike up one cry, in favor of surrender or defeat, feel free to join in the conversation.
However, I think we can agree that the film is so flat-out phony that "fact-checking" is beside the point. And as for the scary lawyers—get a life, or maybe see me in court. But I offer this, to Moore and to his rapid response rabble. Any time, Michael my boy. Let's redo Telluride. Any show. Any place. Any platform. Let's see what you're made of.

Posted by: ter0 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 11:56 AM


ter0,

Yes, his handling of Moore has been masterful. But on Reagan's death, he became positively unglued . . .

http://slate.msn.com/id/2101842/

With Dick Morris, I get the impression that he is now "working for us." Hitchens, on the other hand, is still a loose cannoon, albeit an impressive one, and a good one to not have pointed in your direction . . .

Posted by: DWC [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 01:35 PM

I too was thoroughly disgusted with Hitchens' ugly, mean-spirited, vituperative, below-the-belt "remembrance" of President Reagan. It's really put me off him.

Hitchens' remarks were so completely at odds with the scores of Reagan's closest friends and relatives -- the people who lived and worked with him day by day -- that I can only conclude that Hitchens' hatred of him was simply blind and irrational.

Posted by: Sloan [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 07:01 PM

Way to miss the point, people.

Posted by: bananas [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2004 04:26 AM


http://slate.msn.com/id/2103795/

Hitchens is back on track with this. I would say that pretty much everyone except Josh Marshall has now found Ambassador Wilson guilty of, at best, fudging the truth.

After reading his closing, I find it funny, though, how both conservatives and liberals miss the Cold War. Conservative miss it because of the moral clarity a mortal enemy like Communism provided, Liberaks like Hitchens miss it because it was OK to hate the CIA. His observation that the left now finds itself uncomfortably allied with the CIA is dead on.

Hitchens remains one of those people I admire even though I'm not always comfortable with him.

Posted by: DWC [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 14, 2004 09:37 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?