This post was submitted by reader Richard Santalesa.

~ Alan

-------------------------------------------

Memorial Day - What's the price of freedom?

Every Memorial Day weekend I watch a WWII war movie. For this Memorial Day weekend I rented Bataan, courtesy of Netflix. Bataan was released in 1943, during WWII, before we returned to the Philippines, and included a very young, pre-I Love Lucy, Desi Arnez as Corp. Felix Ramirez. I was stuck home today waiting for the siding guy to give me an estimate, and so I popped the movie in. This movie would appall the Euro can't-we-all-get-along crowd.

The plot centers around a single squad of thirteen men. There's no sweeping battle field; no epic tactics involved. Thrown together from other units the squad's mission is: blow up a bridge, and prevent the "Japs" from crossing and outflanking the remains of the U.S. army to the south. Everyone in the squad dies by the end. Let that sink in. That's a 100% KIA rate by the time the final credits roll.

Yet, they accomplished their mission, and if any one line stands out -- again the movie is not an epic -- it's the line the Sgt., played by Robert Taylor, speaks to one young soldier. He delivers it at the point when the squad has been whittled down to three, and has just finished a brutal hand-to-hand battle with grenades flying like spitballs, thumping tommy guns spitting clouds of smoke, bayoneting galore, and a samurai sword decapitation (though sans today's level of gore). The Sgt. states, without fanfare, that "it doesn't matter where a man dies, as long as he dies for freedom."

But do those words still resonate in 2004? What would we do today, given a political climate evidenced by Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, and their minions, were we called upon to fight an all-out-war that would absolutely result in large casualties? On one level the question's more rhetorical than practical, given our military superiority, and the level of technical precision and prowess today's military brings to bear compared to the pre-digital WWII era.

Although the world of 2004 is not the world of 1941, and I have great faith in the American people, I wonder if the intestinal fortitude needed to ensure we remain the "land of the free and home of the brave" remains. As a law student, the creeping federalization of criminal law, and the rise of zero tolerance idiocy troubles me deeply. But, freedom ultimately boils down to enough people sharing the values our country was founded upon, and being willing to fight for them.

"house [in what is now Whitestone, Queens,] was plundered by a party of British light horse. His extensive library and valuable papers of every description were wantonly destroyed. . . . [the British] thirsted for revenge upon a man, who had dared to affix his signature to a document, which proclaimed the independence of America. Unfortunately Mrs. Lewis fell into their power, and was retained a prisoner for several months. [She died shortly after her release.]"

The price of freedom can be very high. Can it ever be too high? Would I be willing to -- knowing it would mean the loss of everything, the death of my dear wife, and a future populace that cared little about my sacrifice -- have signed the Declaration? That's a question one can only answer honestly alone in the middle of the deep dark night. The price of freedom can be very high -- as it was for virtually every signer of the Declaration, (see What Happened to the 56 Men Who Signed the Declaration of Independence, available at http://www.patriotparty.us/documents/bios/price.htm). Granted, Francis Lewis and the other signers couldn't know what fate awaited them, but surely they knew with certainly what their fate would be should the British capture them.

Memorial Day is the day we, as Americans, reflect on the sacrifices made by those who could and did answer the question of "what's the price of freedom?" It's a question worth revisiting every year.

30