![]() |
|
April 29, 2004
Kerry surrogate threatened Kerry crewmate with "firestorm" if he criticized the candidate
As the campaign season heats up, a Kerry surrogate, historian Douglas Brinkley, has reportedly threatened an old Kerry crewmate with a "firestorm" if he went public with his criticisms of the candidate. Via Boston.com News: - - - - - - - What kind of a historian is Douglas Brinkley anyway? These days Brinkley is acting a lot less like a historian and a lot more like a PR flack for John Kerry, the subject of Brinkley's flattering bestseller "Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the Vietnam War." Brinkley proclaims his independence from the Kerry campaign -- "This is my book, not his," he writes in "Tour" -- but he's become a major player in the Kerry agitprop machine. - - - - - - - In "Tour of Duty," Brinkley makes much of how Kerry shared all his Vietnam records, and of the extra research the author brought to the book. And yet, just a few months after publication, here are three examples of lazy puffery in Brinkley's tome. Brinkley told the Atlantic magazine, which excerpted a portion of the book, that he interviewed "every single one" of John Kerry's crewmates on the so-called swift boats that Kerry captained in Vietnam. But in fact he did not interview crew member Steven Gardner, and -- surprise! -- Gardner turned out to be the only one of Kerry's crewmates who disliked his former commander. "I would have talked to Gardner, but I couldn't find him," Brinkley says now. It gets worse. After the Kerry campaign learned that the Globe had interviewed Gardner for its Kerry biography, Brinkley called Gardner. The presidential historian -- Brinkley has written about Franklin Roosevelt and is a disciple of the late historian and biographer Stephen Ambrose -- warned Gardner of a "firestorm" if the vet went public with his doubts about Kerry, and then hacked out an article attacking the former gunner's mate on Time magazine's website! Hilariously, Kerry declined to talk to the Globe about Gardner's criticisms, but graced Brinkley with his opinion -- uncritically relayed by the historian -- that Gardner's stories were "made up." Who needs opposition research when Doug Brinkley is on the case? - - - - - - - Via Instapundit. This is a duplicate of the original post at the nikita demosthenes website. UPDATE: Of course, being a flack for Kerry - while posing as an "independent" historian - is bad enough. But hopefully Brinkley will not sink to the kind of hate-America-first poison that many on the left are so proud to express. This link is via the apparently quickly recuperating Andrew Sullivan. (Scroll down). Get well soon, Andrew. Posted By nikita demosthenes at April 29, 2004 10:59 AM | TrackBackComments
Definition:
Posted by: sbw at April 29, 2004 01:12 PM I saw Brinkley on Fox, the guy was toeing the party line all the way. No objectivity, no credibility. Posted by: Helen at April 29, 2004 05:58 PM This story about a lone dissenter or two from the widespread acclaim by John Kerry's co-patriots regarding his service in Vietnam is ridiculous. You make it appear as though Brinkly is "threatening" the antagonist with a "firestorm" of disapproval, whereas this is simply a likely reporting of an all-too-human and all-too-likely response by the vast majority of co-patriots who support Kerry.
Posted by: bob at May 3, 2004 10:46 AM OK, how about "Hundreds of former commanders and military colleagues"
Posted by: keith at May 3, 2004 05:16 PM Does anybody know if Gardner is among the signers of this letter? Posted by: Dean Douthat at May 3, 2004 05:31 PM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |