![]() |
|
April 07, 2004
Doonesbury's Trudeau Uses Racial Slur For Nat'l Security Advisor Rice
Although consistently a strident supporter of the Democrat Party in his daily comic strip, many feel that Doonesbury author Gary Trudeau went beyond the line of fair criticism and good taste in today's published work. In today's strip, Trudeau has a fictional President Bush refer to National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice using the racial slur "brown sugar." Such words from Trent Lott, any Republican, or any conservative writer, would cause howls from the left - and a 3-day news cycle about the "uproar." Once again, the left feels at ease holding itself to lower standards. And once again, the left feels at ease treating African-Americans as an after-thought: "Oh - they'll vote for us anyway, don't worry what we say about them." This is why Chris Dodd, Democrat Senator from Connecticut, is so comfortable saying that former Ku Klux Klan member, Robert Byrd of West Virginia, would have been an excellent Senator during the American Civil War. See here and here. Here's Trudeau's strip:
Gary Trudeau of Doonesbury refers to National Security Advisory Condoleeza Rice as "brown sugar"This is a duplicate of the original post on the nikita demosthenes website. UPDATE: It should be noted that, at a more basic level, Trudeau is perhaps doing something worse than using a racial slur in referring to Rice. Trudeau is accepting without any examination the falsehood being peddled by Richard A. Clarke regarding National Security Advisor Rice, i.e., that she had never hear about al Qaeda until Clarke told her about it. This is a stunning lie which the mainstream press have almost entirely let slide - and Trudeau just parrots it. This ability of the left to just shamelessly lie about basic facts important to our national security is irresponsible to say the least. See this response from Rice: - - - - - - - Rice also characterized as "ridiculous" Clarke's statement in his book that she seemed unaware of al Qaeda until he told her about it. "I wasn't born yesterday when Clarke briefed me," she said. "This wasn't an issue of who knew about al Qaeda, but what we were going to do about al Qaeda." White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters that Clarke's "assertions are deeply irresponsible and they are flat-out wrong." He also said Clarke's "past comments and actions contradict his current rhetoric when it comes to Iraq." - - - - - - - In her interview with CNN, Rice pointed out repeatedly that Clarke was in charge of counterterrorism efforts in 1998 when U.S. embassies in Africa were bombed and in 2000 when the USS Cole was bombed, as well as during "a period of the '90s when al Qaeda was strengthening and when the plots that ended up in September 11th were being hatched." She said Clarke holds a more "narrow view" of combating terrorism than Bush does. - - - - - - - Posted By nikita demosthenes at April 7, 2004 02:33 PM | TrackBackComments
Of course it also doesn't help that he infers that Dr. Rice hadn't heard of Al Quaida, when clearly she had been speaking about it for some time.
Posted by: monkeyboy at April 7, 2004 02:43 PM Worst thing about him is he hasn't been funny or relevant for 25 years. Posted by: jones at April 7, 2004 02:52 PM As much as I dislike Trudeau and wish the worst for him, that isn't what I would call a big deal. If anything, he's showing disrespect for the President by suggesting that the President would give Rice a demeaning, racist nickname. Of course, being disrespectful to the President is sort of Trudeau's job as a editorial cartoonist for the opposition, so I can't really complain about it.
Posted by: Mitch H. at April 7, 2004 02:56 PM "Brown Sugar". Well, it conjurs up an image in my mind, but the vision ain't wearing a business suit-dress. Posted by: Cap'n DOC at April 7, 2004 03:23 PM "Although consistently a strident supporter of the Democratic Party..."
Posted by: gek at April 7, 2004 03:50 PM gek:
Posted by: nikita demosthenes at April 7, 2004 03:55 PM I suppose somebody reads Trudeau's '70's time wrap drivel since it appears in my newspaper everyday. But it appears that I don't know any of those people. Must be my Pauline Kael moment. Posted by: Tongue Boy at April 7, 2004 04:49 PM "wrap"? Er... that's "warp". The preview function is only as good as the poster who uses it. Time for another Fat Tire... Posted by: Tongue Boy at April 7, 2004 04:50 PM Mitch H has got it right. The punchline is Bush uses a racial slur in his belittling, controlling approach to his toadies. It also fits with the proud-of-ignorance good-'ol'-boy persona he's cultivated. In response, there was a little Rolling Stones a capella rolling through my office this morning...
Posted by: rooser04 at April 7, 2004 05:12 PM rooser, I hope you got that I don't think the President is a racist. As for the Cooksey bullshit, fine - but just remember along with that the fact that the "people need to be careful about what they say" line that got Ari Fleischer in so much hot water with the lib-left scorpions was in direct, condemnatory response to Cooksey's racist twaddle. He wasn't talking about dissidents, he was condemning anti-Muslim, xenophobic rhetoric. Posted by: Mitch H. at April 7, 2004 05:35 PM Mr. Trudeau quickly forgot a very telling incident:
Posted by: gus3 at April 7, 2004 05:56 PM What's that sound? Oh yes, the empty echo of right-wingers concerned about "racism". By the way, gus3, the troops really loved that fake turkey. Posted by: Blue Demon at April 7, 2004 06:16 PM Now lets be fair...
Posted by: eric at April 7, 2004 06:27 PM eric: Then Mr. Trudeau belongs on the humor page, where fantasy is the rule of the day.
Posted by: gus3 at April 7, 2004 07:09 PM Blue Demon,
Posted by: jones at April 7, 2004 08:10 PM Blue Demon: Of course, it wouldn't be good enough for you. Even if it was the finest turkey in the world, you'd manage to find a way to complain about it, right? Never mind that the troops themselves wouldn't have cared if all they got was a hot dog and a soda.
Posted by: gus3 at April 7, 2004 08:32 PM ahhh who gives a flying flip?
Posted by: gijoe at April 7, 2004 09:12 PM So, could I see the proof that the turkey was fake? I must have missed that one.
Posted by: Deprogrammer at April 7, 2004 09:52 PM You're all acting like Trudeau made this up. That's Bush speaking in the cartoon. The cartoonist just draws the events. Duh! Posted by: Popeye for President at April 7, 2004 11:43 PM What’s that sound? Oh yes, the empty echo of right-wingers concerned about “racism”. By the way, gus3, the troops really loved that fake turkey.
Posted by: Dan Kauffman at April 8, 2004 04:11 AM I've written my local paper several times demanding that Doonesbury be reomved from the comics pages. First, it just isn't funny anymore. Second, it is all political opinion. At best it belongs in the OpEd section.
Posted by: Val Prieto at April 8, 2004 08:06 AM Rice is a fine, decent, competent, intelligent person. That's probably what pisses the Democrats the most. Of course she's going to get trashed today by the Democrats. What do you expect? I personally get tired of the dumb shits in the American media helping out their Demo friends by trashing capable folks who are doing their job. Posted by: popd at April 8, 2004 08:37 AM Rice is a fine, decent, competent, intelligent person. That's probably what pisses the Democrats the most. Of course she's going to get trashed today by the Democrats. What do you expect? I personally get tired of the dumb shits in the American media helping out their Demo friends by trashing capable folks who are doing their job. Posted by: popd at April 8, 2004 08:37 AM I have been watching the attacks on Condi by the left increase in intensity for the last couple of weeks. I am beginning to think they are terrified of her, that she might just be nominated for President one day, and what will the liberal twits do then. Continue their attacks on a smart, educated, black woman.
Posted by: Fred Jenson at April 8, 2004 11:08 AM Eric: what you said about not minding getting some of that brown sugar yourself is also the base implication of Trudeau's cartoon. When he has GWB say it, by extension, it raises questions. You're right, it is a sexual and intimate term, that's the point I made on my blog. The way Trudeau uses it, it is also racist because he employs it as a put down. Think about it in the entire context, and that's where you end up. Condi's good for a piece cuz she don't know nuthin'. Posted by: Helen at April 8, 2004 12:40 PM Funny as hell. If you're not laughing you need to grow a funny bone.
Posted by: Jim Bosso at April 9, 2004 02:01 PM This whole issue regarding Ms. Rice has been making my blood boil.
Posted by: zettler at April 9, 2004 04:30 PM I don't really see how "brown sugar" is racist...
Posted by: g at April 9, 2004 06:27 PM I wouldn't get too exercised about all this. Trying to turn any criticism of Rice into a charge of racism will be the Republicans next tactic as things start to slip, just like nikita tried to do above. Kinda pathetic.
Posted by: BigBill at April 10, 2004 06:13 AM Give me a break! This is simply a parody of Dubya's well-known personal practice of name-calling to help him remember who is who.
Posted by: evenmoreimaginative at April 12, 2004 04:59 AM Rice is a fine, decent, competent, intelligent person. That’s probably what pisses the Democrats the most. Of course she’s going to get trashed today by the Democrats.
Posted by: ch2 at April 19, 2004 03:26 PM I've been reading Doonesbury and not missed one since oh, 1970-something, bought all the reprints from the Yale years, and am proud to be a big fan. His cartoon - relegated (or promoted) to the editorial page off the funnies in most papers I read - is like Peanuts was - another world, parallel to ours, where I could get away every day.
Posted by: Jeff at April 21, 2004 04:35 PM Is anyone aware of any politically conservative cartoons, and where they can be found? There used to be many floating around during the Clinton years, but they are hard to find these days. Posted by: Dan at April 22, 2004 02:35 PM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |