The Command Post
Iraq
October 09, 2003
Rumsfeld confesses : "It's beyond me"

From J.David Chadwick Dot Com :

JDC -- Mr. Secretary, I'm [J. David Chadwick]. My question is, considering that we still have troops in every area that we have conducted operations during the Clinton administration, why is this operation in Iraq viewed negatively in the press as a Vietnam- style quagmire?

Secretary Rumsfeld: Give that man an "A".

I'll tell you, it's beyond me. I just had a hearing before the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee on an emergency supplemental budget. And that very day, 17 members of the United States Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, had just arrived back from Iraq. And six of them were on that committee. And they went right down the line, every single one of them, saying that what they see and read about Iraq in the United States and in the region does not compare with what they personally saw and experienced with their own eyes. These people went right down -- they were stunned by the difference between what they experienced in that country and what they saw and what they were being told in the press.

Now, it should not surprise you that the next day there was not a single word in the press about that hearing. Not one of those first eyewitness comments by seven members -- six or seven members of the United States House of Representatives of both parties -- not a single word of what they said about what was taking place in Iraq appeared, to my knowledge, in -- at least in the Washington press.


...and the article has a lot more besides. Worth reading the whole thing. Now, if he'd only left a permalink...

As for the title of this piece on the Command Post? Well, if the mainstream media had reported it, that would have been the headline. Or worse :

"Rumsfeld Confesses Iraqi Situation is Beyond Him"
[...]
"...it isn't like it's one problem, it's like that it's 24 problems, one every hour, " the Defence Secretary admitted publically.
[...]
"We've been in there for five months since the end of major combat operations." Secreatary Rumsfeld said, "... a quagmire".

A visibly emotional Rumsfeld then retreated, and refused to answer more questions. "I'm told there's time for two more questions, but I'm inclined to quit on that one." he said.

Maybe someone should remind him that a winner never quits, and a quitter never wins.

(I should make it crystal clear that the above 'quote' is not from the BBC, despite all appearances to the contrary. Just me pretending I'm a writer for the New York Times.)

Posted By Zoe Brain at October 9, 2003 07:14 AM | TrackBack
Comments

This is just an another underscore highlighting what is really the big Iraq story. The earlier BBC kerfuffle with the Gilligan guy just scratched the surface. The question is--how long before it ('it' being the mainstream media distortion and misrepresentation of events and circumstance surrounding Iraq since before the war started) resonates at the appropriate harmonic and grows too loud for those same mainstream outlets to keep damped down.

It's currently all over the web, and surfacing on some of the mainstream commentary pages.

The really distressing bit is that this is not some sort of coordinated mainstream media collusion or conspiracy. It's really much worse than that. The media--in general, with exceptions-- seem to have become the self-appointed Ministry of Truth for the Tranzi movement.

Posted by: CERDIP at October 9, 2003 08:34 AM

Alan E As per my bent, I went out and read it - then I came back and read the entire 'post'. ROFLMAO.

Your page 1/page 3 OpEd leads and subtitles are spot-on. Give us more Instant Gratification, puhlease!

I believe MY Senator is over there now, or he may have been part of the most recent tour, and I have yet to see any ink on his trip in the local or state daily rags. Why does that surprise me? He's a Republican...

Posted by: Cap'n SPIN at October 9, 2003 09:28 AM

Yeah, Alan E and Cap'n Dave;

This story is getting really old...
Do you think its too late to buy a newspaper? I hear they have plenty that they aren't using. Maybe, I will go down to my local rag with about a bazillion dollars and make an offer, when asked why I would wanna do that, I'd answer it was my patriotic duty to put a newspaper where a newpaper ought to be.

If you actually knew me, you'd think that was pretty funny...

Posted by: Sunami at October 9, 2003 09:41 AM

I actually know you. It's funny. :o)

Posted by: Cap'n SPIN at October 9, 2003 09:59 AM

For some time now I've been intrigued about how News Agencies adopted the terminology “media” to describe themselves. Perhaps it was generated by the technological age to include the multitude of forms of reporting now used. But to me it’s almost like the manipulation of the word “organic” to technically keep within the guidelines. I keep trying to remember back to the point in time when the description of reporting switched from NEWS to MEDIA. I think it would be an interesting milestone for the marketing techniques used to sell newspapers, especially since the word media had roots in art expression long before it was manipulated to describe NEWS AGENCIES.

Alan!
LOL.. You get an “A+”!

Posted by: TexasGal at October 9, 2003 11:50 AM

You know, this harping on the negativity of the media is fine, but honestly, I have heard on both FOX (no surprise) and CNN (surprise!) in the US of the "general media disconnect on Iraq". Its not front-page news, but it is there. And its the kind of thing that makes you stop and listen. The negitve comments are mostly from the Pundits that Analyize the news. Just the other day the local channel 2 in the SF Bay area reported on the school openings in Iraq. And you cant get more liberal than right here.

I know this because my wife, who listens to almost no news except for baseball (sorry, Giants), has mentioned it. And she's the most Apolictical, with an "A" person that I know. And a Democrat.

So dont go barking about how nobody understands the real situation... they are starting to get it.

-adam

Posted by: adam at October 9, 2003 11:16 PM

Case in point: from www.msnbc.com tonight:

Oct. 9 — As Iraq becomes more stable, it means a huge emerging market for U.S. firms that want to do business there.

Posted by: adam at October 9, 2003 11:25 PM

That's a good point Adam. Yes, lately the media has been turning around and reporting more of the positive stuff.

But I can’t help but wonder if it's because they read the market so to speak and heard the public complaining and Senators returning with pointing fingers at them.. or did they see images of the infamous Minister of MisINFORMATION looming in their future. Maybe all of the above!

Posted by: TexasGal at October 10, 2003 12:26 AM

I'm getting really disgusted with the mainstream media. It seems like I have to do everything myself:-(

I am going to put on the list of 'Life Long things to Do' a Freelanced Newspaper. I will have news articles and stories and things that in which have as their primary source actual 'Primary Sources.'

The truth must be known and I will freelance this newspaper and either sell it for very cheap or hand it out free of charge. Probably keep it free.

Posted by: Jeff MacMillan at October 10, 2003 12:43 AM

Jeff Mac;

I had once thought that thaat was what blogs were for. In fact, I had traced it back to something called 'Pamphleteering' in US history. There were all sorts of slime jobs running those types of things but some were to print the unofficial story and get it out to the people.

Thank God that He had seen fit to give us blogs or we would have found it necessary to invent them.

Texas Gal;

That wouldn't have something to do with Rush losing his job and then a poll showing that even 28% of the liberals think that 'duh meedja' was way over the line, or even that the LATHYMES was caught trying to influence an election by printing 'unnamed sources' accusing Arnold Schwarzennegger of being a mass groper when he wasn't even there would it?

Dispite what the press says, I tend to believe the opposite and consequently; I tend to have pretty good days right off the bat...

Posted by: Sunami at October 10, 2003 09:22 AM

Sunami,

That’s a very good philosophy!

Posted by: TexasGal at October 10, 2003 11:12 AM

Here's the permalink if you still want it:
www.jdavidchadwick.com/2003columns/amaterial

Posted by: Davey at November 2, 2003 02:05 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?