The Command Post
Iraq
August 18, 2003
Riyadh Delenda Est, Part Deux

Saudi Arabia's Teachers of Terror (washingtonpost.com)
Based on this article from two Senators, it appears that madrassas are, in large part, terrorist indoctrination centers. We need to make the Saudis decide whose side they are on. Their duplicity has got to come to an end and if it means severing formal ties with them, so be it.

Unless we are prepared to use the military, and I doubt many people in this country are, our options are limited in the short term. An oil embargo would be foolish because we would punish ourselves and for little gain: oil is fungible and can make its way into this country through third parties. Even so, over the long term the Saudis need us more than we need them. Their economy is a one-trick pony: oil. That provides us with the leverage to force long-term change.

Right now we import about 17% of our oil from Saudi Arabia. I don't know which way it is trending at the moment but I do know we have managed to diversify our oil portfolio over the last twenty years -- to the detriment of the Saudis -- and believe we will be able to continue to do so when Iraq is at full capacity in a few years. Russia has also been increasing its exports of oil drastically in recent years and that will likely continue.

The House of Saud has for decades played a double game with the United States, on the one hand acting as our ally, on the other supporting a movement -- Wahhabism -- that seeks our society's destruction. Because of other strategic interests, our government has long indulged the Saudis, overlooking their financial and structural ties to one of the world's most violent terror organizations.

After the attacks of 9/11, President Bush made clear that America would no longer play that game. He said: "Every nation will have a choice to make: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." It is time for Saudi Arabia to make that choice.

Upon its establishment as the nation's ruling family, the House of Saud forged an alliance with the radical Wahhabi sect of Islam. The deal that was struck gave the House of Saud control over political and foreign policy, while the Wahhabis would be free to take charge of the society's religious and cultural institutions.

Recently our subcommittee on terrorism held the first of a series of public hearings on the activities of this Wahhabi sect. The findings were alarming. Wahhabism is an extremist, exclusionary form of Islam that not only denigrates other faiths but also marginalizes peaceful followers of Islam. As witnesses testified, Wahhabism uses mosques and schools, called madrassas, to indoctrinate mostly young people with a hatred of Jews, Christians and traditional Muslims who reject this radicalism. Its goals are world domination and the destruction of its enemies.

Osama bin Laden is a follower of Wahhabism. So were all 19 of the Sept. 11 hijackers. Bin Laden's al Qaeda trained the Taliban in Afghanistan, formed a movement that threatens the government of Pakistan and is the source of terrorist atrocities from Morocco to Indonesia, Israel, Kenya, Tanzania, Yemen and Saudi Arabia itself.

Read the whole thing.

Posted By Robert Prather (Insults Unpunished) at August 18, 2003 03:08 AM | TrackBack
Comments

/The House of Saud allows the [Wahhabis] to hand-pick imams to control local mosques and to run the madrassas./

The terrorist aspects of Wahhabism have been pawned off in the West as simply a family feud between Jews and Muslims. However, by insisting on a fair negotiated solution to the Israeli conflict, the US has found itself in the sights of these same terrorists. Now we must either abandon Israel or bring regime change to the Madrassa Mullahs. Abandoning Israel would be a crime on par with the holocaust. So what to do with the Madrassas?

Here's an idealistic hope --- we could insist that the Saudis sponsor in-depth dialogs with Christians and Jews at every Madrassa in the country. The House of Saud controls the environment, and they can shape the environment.

The alternatives are either violence or containment, since the status quo is not at all acceptable. Containment is not likely to succeed. Violence would have to be covert, and therefore extremely risky. It wouldn't take long to guess who was behind any covert action. Maybe the Saudis could be persuaded to change? At least Iraq gives us some added clout when it comes to persuasion.

Posted by: Trouble at August 18, 2003 02:02 PM

Outside Saudi Arabia, this branch of Islam is often referred to as "Wahhabi" [Wahabbi] a term the Saudis do not use. The teachings of the reformer Abd Al-Wahhab are more often referred to by adherents as "Salafi" or "Muwahiddun," that is, following the forefathers of Islam, or unifiers of Islamic practice.

It is regarded, outside Saudi Arabia, as a heretical sect. Unfortunately, throughout the last century (even under the British vrule), oil money was used to establish hospitals, mosques, and schools. These were accepted, as saving a great deal of money for other governments - and now the whole area has a Wahabbi-tinged educated class.

Posted by: John Anderson at August 18, 2003 08:25 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?