![]() |
|
July 29, 2003
Islam: Between Copying & Thinking
Winds of Change.NET's Egyptian correspondent Tarek Heggy offers us a whirlwind tour or Islamic thought - and especially the 2 models of thinking that he sees within Islam. Our guest blogger also asks some hard questions, and says it's time for both the West and Muslims to acknowledge their past failings and their responsibilities. Islam: Between Copying and Thinking. An excerpt: "When I compare some of the works of Al-Ghazali (Algazel)... which are distinctly lacking in rationality, with the writings of Ibn Rushd, in which rationality reigns supreme, I am amazed that the battle waged between the exponents of these two distinct schools ten centuries ago should have ended up in a clear victory for Al-Ghazali and a crushing defeat for Ibn Rushd. Nowhere is the difference in the approach of the two men more evident than in their defining works: Al-Ghazali’s "The Incoherence of the Philosophers" and Ibn Rushd’s "The Incoherence of the Incoherence".... Why were Al-Ghazali’s ideas so readily accepted while Ibn Rushd’s were rejected?A battle that still has important echoes and consequences today. Gotta love Ibn Rushd's (a.k.a. Averoess) book title, too. That guy would have made a great blogger - reasoned arguments, well expressed, and he already seems to understand the principles of a good Fisking. Posted By Winds of Change.NET at July 29, 2003 01:32 AM | TrackBack Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |