The Command Post
Iraq
June 14, 2003
Don't Send Any American Troops Unless It's To Destroy Hamas

Ha'aretz: Kofi Annan calls for international 'buffer' force
The last thing the United States needs is soldiers in the middle of Hamas and Israel trying to act as peacekeepers. The UN can use European troops for that mission. Besides, the last thing we need to do is legitimize a tactic we would never use ourselves: hold off a terrorist group. If we get involved militarily it should be to destroy the military wing of Hamas.

According to what I'm hearing on the news, Hamas is now more popular among Palestinians than Arafat. It's not hard to understand why since they provide social services to Palestinians with one hand and kill Jews with the other.

Think I'm being too harsh in my assessment of Palestinian attitudes towards Jews? A recent Pew Global poll showed the following:

80% of Palestinians agreed with the statement: "The rights and needs of the Palestinian people cannot be taken care of as long as the State of Israel exists."
Kofi is kidding himself if he thinks sending peacekeepers will do anything other than trap them in the middle of a war, and they'll be instructed not to take sides. Each side will be equally to blame, the "peacekeeper" logic goes.

That's why the U.S. military should stay out of it. They excel at meeting clear objectives and destroying Hamas would be one such objective. Without that mandate, leave it to others.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan does not have much faith in the ability of Israelis and Palestinians to resolve their bloody conflict on their own.

He nods vigorously when asked if he supports the posting of an armed peacekeeping force to separate the adversaries. He expects that the 51 American monitors led by John Wolf will not be enough and believes the conflict probably cannot be ended without the intervention of a foreign buffer force, as has been done in other regions of the world.

"The monitoring mechanism that will be put in place next week is a beginning and it may be enough if the parties are able to break the cycle of violence. In the interim period, I would like to see an armed peacekeeping force act as a buffer between the Israelis and Palestinians," Annan said in an interview with Haaretz.

Until then, he urges Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) to muster the necessary strength to break the cycle of violence. "The international community has an obligation to support Abbas and to work with him," says Annan, immediately adding that the Israeli government could make it easier for him by easing some of the restrictions in the territories, so Abbas "would be able to indicate that there is hope, that there is progress and that we are moving forward."

James Taranto was right today when he suggested that the phrase "cycle of violence" is moral equivalence. But the Israelis and Hamas are not moral equals: even when Israel strikes preemptively they are acting in self defense and aiming for terrorists. Hamas intentionally targets civilians. They are monstrous.

Posted By Robert Prather (Insults Unpunished) at June 14, 2003 08:35 AM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?