|
|
Navigate The Post
Command Post Main
Command Post Forum The Publisher's Desk Iraq PDA | Print | RSS Feed Politics & Elections PDA | Print | RSS Feed Global Recon PDA | Print | RSS Feed Global War on Terror PDA | Print | RSS Feed Op-Ed PDA | Print | RSS Feed TCP Archives
Search The Post
2004 Election
Analysis Antiwar Activism Axis of Weasels Civil Liberties Critique of Tactics Economy Fisks Global Strategy Home Front Support Humor or Satire Iran Iraq Reconstruction Media Bias Military strategy MSM N. Korea News Perspective Politics & The War Random Speculation Rants TCP Authorship Terrorism United Nations Views From the Other Side WMDs About The Post
Status:
1732 PolElect entries 15341 PolElect comments Our Mission Our Vision Our Values Our History Our Posting Guidelines Our Comment Policy Our Terms Of Use Our Ad Policy Join Our Team Contact: alan at command-post dot org michele at command-post dot org History As It Happened
May 2006
February 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 The Rest
The Lawyers Made Us Do It
|
March 27, 2003
Delusions of Grandeur - Another Day at the UN
Mexico's UN ambassador sees the current mess as an opportunity for Mexico - which takes over as head of the UN security council next week. He has also been making startlingly ambitious comments about the future of the UN, in a breach with Mexico's tradition of non-involvement in global affairs. "Mexico thinks it is necessary to revise and limit the power of veto," he said this week, adding that this would have to be in the context of a profound re-ordering of how the UN worked. I think he is having delusions of grandeur. Why would any of the five veto powers (especially France) agree to this? And if even one disagrees, the requested change will simply be vetoed. I doubt it will even come up for a vote. This was part of a longer post I did on the Future of the UN Posted By Admiral Quixote at March 27, 2003 03:30 PM | TrackBackComments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |