![]() |
|
Global Recon
August 22, 2005
White House Appoints Special Envoy for N. Korea Human Rights
As expected, the White House has appointed Jay Lefkowitz as Special Envoy for Human Rights in North Korea, a position mandated by Section 107 of the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004. In naming Mr. Lefkowitz at this time, the administration appears to have waited for a “decent interval” between negotiating sessions with North Korea during six-nation talks. The Washington Post covered the story with an article written by Reuters, which benefits from actually taking the trouble to contact the people who were behind the NKHRA in the first place: But U.S. officials said the appointment, announced by the White House, had been in the works for some time and was not aimed at putting pressure on the North Koreans ahead of the resumption of the nuclear talks. My only quibble with the Reuters report is with the estimated death toll of 1 million. Although that number is not outside the range of reasonable estimates, most reasonable estimates of the death toll are twice that. The New York Times also reported the story, noting that the timing and circumstances of the announcement suggests an effort by the White House to keep the appointment low-key. That seems plausible. If so, don't expect to hear much from Jay Lefkowitz until after the next session of the six-party talks, scheduled to begin on August 29th. Even less encouraging is the fact that Lefkowitz will continue working his day job with the Washington law firm of Kirkland and Ellis, at least on a part-time basis. That could prove a considerable distraction from his duties as Special Envoy. Here is the text of Section 107 of the NKHRA, which created the position of Special Envoy: (a) Special Envoy.--The President shall appoint a special envoy for human rights in North Korea within the Department of State hereafter in this section referred to as the ``Special Envoy''). The Special Envoy should be a person of recognized distinction in the field of human rights. (b) Central Objective.--The central objective of the Special Envoy is to coordinate and promote efforts to improve respect for the fundamental human rights of the people of North Korea. © Duties and Responsibilities.--The Special Envoy shall-- (1) engage in discussions with North Korean officials regarding human rights; (2) support international efforts to promote human rights and political freedoms in North Korea, including coordination and dialogue between the United States and the United Nations, the European Union, North Korea, and the other countries in Northeast Asia; (3) consult with non-governmental organizations who have attempted to address human rights in North Korea; (4) make recommendations regarding the funding of activities authorized in section 102; (5) review strategies for improving protection of human rights in North Korea, including technical training and exhange programs; and (6) develop an action plan for supporting implementation of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights Resolution 2004/13. (d) Report on Activities.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually for the subsequent 5 year-period, the Special Envoy shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the activities undertaken in the preceding 12 months under subsection ©. Posted by OneFreeKorea at August 22, 2005 05:37 PM | TrackBackComments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |