![]() |
|
Global Recon
January 30, 2005
Times of London: North Korean Regime in Its Death Throes
Two correspondents from the Times of London, who entered North Korea under the guise of potential investors, have filed this remarkable report headlined, "Chairman Kim's Dissolving Kingdom." It paints a picture of rapid decay among the state's mechanism of control, as if only inertia and an initial spark are delaying the regime's rapid (and most likely, violent) collapse. What follow are the major points one distills from the piece: 1. The erosion of the fear state is equally visible to casual observers and insiders. The reporters, who rather bravely posed as would-be investors, saw two refugees slip across the border into China between police patrols as the approached the border.According to exiles, North Korean agents in Beijing and Ulan Bator are frantically selling assets to raise cash — an important sign, says one activist, because “the secret police can always smell the crisis coming before anybody else”. . . . .
2. Kim Jong Il may already have been dethroned. You heard it here first, but others are speculating that Kim Jong-Il has already been secretly removed from power. The speculation certainly ought to have intensified when Kim Jong-Il failed to meet with either congressional delegation that visited Pyongyang recently. Some of those interviewed believe the “Dear Leader”, Kim Jong-il, has already lost his personal authority to a clique of generals and party cadres. Without any public announcement, governments from Tokyo to Washington are preparing for a change of regime. . . . Rumours of rivalry and bloodshed have multiplied since the Dear Leader’s last meetings with dignitaries from Russia and China last September. Since then Kim has vanished from view. Analysts in Seoul say that in recent propaganda pictures the bouffant-haired dictator is wearing the same clothes as in photographs from two years ago, suggesting that they may have been taken then. Observers await Kim’s official birthday, February 16, to see if the state media accord him the usual fawning adulation.Actually, according to blogger Yi Shun Shin's superb Kim Jong-Il tracker, Kim last met with a foreigner (from China) on October 3, 2004. Note that visitors first began to note the absence of Kim Jong-Il portraits on November 16th, so the timing checks out. Meanwhile, South Korea continues to insist on massive infusions of aid to keep the North Korean regime securely in power over its starving population.
3. Persistent rumors suggest that the regime's leadership is divided to the point of fratricide. Take those reports with the obvious caution that the sources (or lack thereof) suggest: Jang Song-thaek, Kim’s ambitious brother-in-law, was purged from party office after he tried to build up a military faction to put his own son in power. Mystery surrounds the fate of Vice-Marshal Jo Myong-rok, the soldier once sent as Kim’s emissary to meet Bill Clinton in the White House. . . . The dictator’s favoured heir apparent, his son Kim Jong-chol, 23, who was educated in Geneva, is reported to have staged a shoot-out inside a palace with Kim Jang-hyun, 34, an illegitimate son of Kim Il-sung, father of the dictator and founder of the dynasty.Background on the Ryongchon train explosion here. 4. With the exception of South Korea, foreign governments are betting that Kim Jong-Il is a spent force. A belief that Kim Jong-Il is finished will strengthen the case against dealing with him or paying off his regime. The Japanese intelligence agency, in an unclassified report issued on December 24, referred to “signs of instability” inside the political establishment and predicted a feud among the elite as they strive to seize power from Kim. . . . .5. The re-election of George W. Bush and America's perceived turn toward "hard-line" policies were a stunning psychological blow to the regime.
President Bush does not deserve the exclusive credit, of course--far from it. The story fails to mention the likely importance of the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004, which passed unanimously on the initiative of Congress, not President Bush. The law requires the United States to pressure North Korea to loosen its oppression of its people by tying U.S. negotiating, aid, and trade policies to human rights concerns. It also appropriates funds for secretly delivering tuneable radios into North Korea and expanding Korean-language broadcasts of Radio Free Asia. Since the passage of the legislation in the House last summer--which first signalled the likely success of the bill--there has a wave of mass defections from North Korea (rapidly followed by desperate crackdowns in China and North Korea); initial signs of resistance have emerged from inside North Korea; there are signs of power shifts and demoralization in the regime itself; parliamentarians have launched similar efforts at human rights legislation in Japan and South Korea; the U.N. has appointed a Special Rapporteur on human rights in North Korea; and the United States will soon appoint its own Special Rapporteur. 6. Reported "economic reforms" have only resulted in more hardship for the North Korean people and an accelerated loss of state control. Two years ago the younger Kim introduced free market reforms in a half-hearted attempt to restart an economy that has been dying since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Rajin, a deepwater port that is open to foreign trade, is supposed to be a showpiece of the new economy in the potentially rich northeast next to China and Russia.
That casino, known as the Emperor, has since shut down under intense pressure from China, after too many of its government officials gambled and lost state funds there. Scratch one more source of revenue for a financially desperate regime. More on the effect of economic reforms here. Posted by OneFreeKorea at January 30, 2005 03:17 PM | TrackBackComments
Kudos to the reporters of the Times of London. We have been hearing of the death throes of the North Korean regime since at least 1999, maybe they are finally here. Kim Jong Il's disappearance certainly seems like a good thing, though we have no idea the effect any coup would have. Still, change of any type in such a horrible situation is almost definitely worth the risk. A democratic revolution seems like a long-shot, but if North Korea can be turned into something akin to Vietnam, that would still be a huge improvement. Posted by: rdelephant Should North Korea fall apart, what country besides South Korea will see enough stake in North Korea to step up to take a significant interest?
Posted by: FRNM Here's another sign of dissent in North Korea:
Posted by: GaijinBiker Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |