![]() |
|
Global Recon
November 20, 2004
Image Shows Missing Kim Jong Il Photo
Above is an image [courtesy of East Asia Intel] that shows one of the recent disappearances of Kim Jong Il photos throughout North Korea. Some defectors from North Korea had said in response to news reports about removed portraits, that they would be replaced by new ones in more ornate frames.I'm still not convinced. I think there has been a coup or some sort of physical ailment or death to the leader. In my previous entry I reported that media had also stopped referring to him as "Beloved Leader". Tipped by: Ace of Spades Originally posted at Diggers Realm
Posted by Digger at November 20, 2004 07:39 PM
| TrackBack
Comments
This is curious, indeed. I guess coups do happen, but its hard to imagine being the palace guards with the balls to take on somebody this powerful and ruthless. Maybe he had one to many cognacs and fell in the shower. We can only hope. Posted by: rdelephant coups happen all the time it wouldn't be anything new to human life--dear leader is s.o.b. and if something is happening i hope whoever comes out on top has some better sense Posted by: bob the good Pictures don't usually come down unless dictators go down first.The picture has not just moved the other has been repositioned,who is it of? The banner beneath has changed also and there are subtle differences in the dimensions,which could be camera angle,but there are significant differences.Are there better pictures available?
Posted by: PeterUK The other photo should be of Kim Jong Il's departed daddy, Kim Il Sung a/k/a Great Leader. Posted by: rdelephant Clearly "dear leader" is in trouble. Interesting how this closely follows the re-election of George Bush Posted by: w33 Under an oppressive dictatorship, you don't take down a photo and leave a bare spot. If you are going to place an image in "a more ornate frame" you get another copy of the photo and put it in the frame before you ever touch the first photo.
Posted by: Limpet Hopefully the "dear leader" is dearly departed. Posted by: dr. sanity A coup doesn't necessarily bode well for the region, or the US. The coup could include members who thought the North wasn't belligerent enough and wanted to take an even harder line against the US, Japan, and the South. This group could have been seeking a confrontation with the West (worst case scenario).
Posted by: lawhawk Excellent point Lawhawk. We could end up with someone much, much worse.
Posted by: Digger Kim Jong Il had been pretty hardline. While I can conceive of someone even more of a hardliner, it's pretty hard. Odds are that a coup would be neutral at worst, and potentially a real positive development. Posted by: rdelephant Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |