July 22, 2004
Little-Known Military Perquisites
This one needs no comment.
From the
New Yorker :
CHEST OUT, STOMACH IN! - Be All You Can Be!
[...]
As Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said in an interview the other day, “We’re perfectly capable of increasing the incentives and the inducements to attract people into the armed services.” For years, the military has offered its recruits free tuition, specialized training, and a host of other benefits to compensate for the tremendous sacrifices they are called upon to make. Lately, many of them have been taking advantage of another perk: free cosmetic surgery.
“Anyone wearing a uniform is eligible,” Dr. Bob Lyons, the chief of plastic surgery at Brooke Army Medical Center, said recently, in his office in San Antonio. It is true: personnel in all four branches of the military and members of their immediate families can get face-lifts, nose jobs, breast enlargements, liposuction, or any other kind of elective cosmetic alteration, at taxpayer expense. (For breast enlargements, patients must supply their own implants.) There is no limit on the number of cosmetic surgeries one soldier can have, although, Lyons said, “we don’t do extreme makeovers in the military.” The commanding officer has to approve the time off for any soldier who is having surgery. For most procedures, there’s at least a ten-day recovery period, and while soldiers are recuperating they’re on paid medical leave rather than vacation.
A Defense Department spokeswoman confirmed the existence of the plastic-surgery benefit. According to the Army, between 2000 and 2003 its doctors performed four hundred and ninety-six breast enlargements and a thousand three hundred and sixty-one liposuction surgeries on soldiers and their dependents. In the first three months of 2004, it performed sixty breast enhancements and two hundred and thirty-one liposuctions.
Mario Moncada, an Army private who was recently treated for losing the vision in one eye in Iraq, said that he knows several female soldiers who have received free breast enlargements: “We’re out there risking our lives. We deserve benefits like that.”
[...]
The Army’s rationale is that, as a spokeswoman said, “the surgeons have to have someone to practice on.” “The benefit of offering elective cosmetic surgery to soldiers is more for the surgeon than for the patient,” Lyons said. “If there’s a happy soldier or sailor at the end of that operation, that’s an added benefit, but that’s not the reason we do it. We do it to maintain our skills”—skills that are critical, he added, when it comes to doing reconstructive surgery on soldiers who have been wounded.
Posted by Alan Brain at July 22, 2004 02:24 AM
| TrackBack
Posted by: Don at July 22, 2004 04:37 AM
Posted by: Vince at July 22, 2004 10:21 AM
Posted by: DWC at July 22, 2004 10:56 AM
Giving new meaning to the term "Personal Flotation Device"
Posted by: Brian at July 22, 2004 03:35 PM
You guys ever hear of Mae West?
Posted by: M. Simon at July 22, 2004 09:01 PM
"Nor does it deserve one."
Sure it does. Look, six comments, counting this one and the first one.
Posted by: CERDIP at July 23, 2004 12:51 PM
An Army of One, and every One a 10.
Posted by: Ian at July 23, 2004 02:10 PM
In three years the Army did 496 breast enlargments, or 165 a year.
In 2003 there were 75,000 women in the army. What size of city would you need, to have 75,000 women of military age in it? And would there be only 165 breast augmentations in such a year?
In one year then, 0.2% of women in the Army had breast augmentation.
Let's assume that all women in the Army are 18-34 for the moment...
Sixty percent of women who get their breasts enlarged are 19-34. In one year, 130,000 breast augmentations were performed which works out to 78,000 for women 19-34. (Not sure which year, it was during or after 2001--the statistic is from the "Today Show", March 27th, but I can't find out which year.)
The total US female population aged 20-34 in 2000 was about 29,000,000. 0.3% of them had breast augmentation, then...
I know I'm mixing numbers from different years and slightly different age brackets. But I think as a preliminary estimate we can say that women in the Army are having breast augmentations done at somewhere between half and the same rate as civilian women, despite the fact that women in the Army are getting them done at taxpayer expense.
Posted by: Gabriel Hanna at July 26, 2004 04:00 AM
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.