The Command Post
Global Recon
July 12, 2004
Japan Seeks Broader Military Role


Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi of Japan

Shinichi Kiyotani of Jane's Magazine reports in a July 12, 2004, article:

- - - - - - -

Japan's 2004 Defence White Paper calls for the Japanese Self-Defence Force (JSDF) to be transformed from its current invasion defence posture to a "more functional force" better able to deal with a range of threats such as terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles.

Publication of the document coincided with the 50th anniversary of the re-establishment of Japan's armed forces after the Second World War. Since then the JSDF has been limited by the constitution to a defensive role and the question of a broader military role, such as the deployment of troops to Iraq, continues to provoke controversy.

Japan's defence budget for the current Fiscal Year, ¥4.9 trillion ($44.47 billion), ranks it as the third-largest military spender behind the US and the UK but the paper notes that if an accurate figure could be established for China it would exceed Japanese spending.

- - - - - - -


It notes other threats in the region. "Taken together with its suspected nuclear weapons programme, North Korea's development and deployment of ballistic missiles constitute a destabilising factor for the international community as a whole and have generated intense anxiety," states the paper.

The White Paper says that the armed forces must be restructured to undertake "diversifying roles". A sweeping review of the armed forces is planned for completion before year-end.

- - - - - - -

The web page for the Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi is here.

In December 2003 the Government of Japan decided to introduce a ballistic missle defense system.

The link to the nikita demosthenes post is here.

Posted by nikita demosthenes at July 12, 2004 11:41 PM | TrackBack
Comments


Looks like Japan is waking up.

Posted by: DWC [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 08:26 AM

Koizumi looks like he's going to personally take the terrorists out with a fearsome double judo chop!

Posted by: Brian [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 09:30 AM

FRankly I would welcome a more active role for Japan. It's a country with significant wealth and if they could help us out in their region we would have more resources to go around.

it is also nice to think that Japan is and will continue to be a stalwart ally. so all those lefties who swear on a stack of Das Capitals that democracy cannot be imposed, take heed.

Posted by: skip [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 10:34 AM

This is good and bad. Ive always wanted to see what a modern Japanese millitary would be like, there is plenty of incentive in thier region of the world to waken from thier pacifist slumber, you can only take so many warning shots fired over your country and citizens kidnapped before you say ENOUGH. Japan is quite capable of building nukes within no time at all, to be honest we would probably give them to them if they even brought it up, last i checked we made no restrictions on what millitary hardware we sold to Japan.

Whats bad? The thought of Japan building a modern millitary also sends cold shiver down my spine sometimes, the Nipon have history...and i mean HIS-STOR-EEE, there was a time not too long ago where you just did not screw with these guys, i mean they took on CHINA, and WON. They walked up to the worlds biggest superpower(guess who!) and kicked it square in the nuts right outa the blue without giving it a second thought. They beat back the mongol's for christsakes.

Japan increasing its police force into a regular Army with modern weapons is one thing, but if they go a little overboard, maybe with a sudden unexpected population explosion and Mitsubishi starts rolling out planes again, expect the base in Okinawa base to be asked to leave. Also expect Kim Jung Il to have a whole new level of politeness at the next negotiation after that.

I hope we never see a day where we regret not making them a state.

Posted by: Ronin [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 11:14 AM

I understand your concerns Ronin, let me try to assuage them:

I think the Japanese society is dramatically different now and I can point out the difference with a single word: Baseball.

Here in Cleveland we've got Kaz Tadano, but many teams now have stellar quality Japanese players. I don't think the Japanese see us as anything other than friends.

sure our soldiers sometimes act the fool but basically our economies are so tightly entwined that Japan might as well be a state of our union.

so a rearmed Japan, absent the code of Bushido and the unquestioning reverence for the Emporer and an admiration for our country is not, IMHO a threat to us.

Besides, back in the seventies when the Japanese economy came roaring to life many people thought the didn't need to attack pearl harbor because they already owned it!!!

Posted by: skip [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 12:19 PM

Japanese investment in the U.S. is huge, not just in California and Hawaii. We have a new Toyota truck plant being built here in San Antonio.

Different generations; different perspectives you know. If we can keep the Communists from winning the election in November, we will have another 4 years to work on achieving Japan type results with the Arabs.

That is worthwhile. Still, this is a generational struggle with the French, the ANSWER type American Democrats and the Islamists working against the Free World.

Posted by: leaddog2 [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 12:50 PM


Do I fear a rearmed Japan? Not nearly as much as I fear China.

Posted by: DWC [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 01:26 PM

Let's just imagine for a moment a ME with an economy like Japan's. All those people buying and selling and contributing to an improved life. People who have suddenly been catapaulted out of the dark and into a brave new world.

Who knows what talents lie hidden in slums of baghdad or cowering in fear in an Iranian college dorm? Surely giving these people a shot a freedom is a noble thing in and of itself.

Look at how both the Japanese and the Germans contributed to the dramatic improvement in the human condition post WWII. Why wouldn't the people of the ME, once freed of the yoke of oppression have the same to offer?

Posted by: skip [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 02:08 PM

Skip,

Give it some time. If we can just keep Iraq from tumbling back into the grips of a despot, I think the region may have a chance. That's not to say a horrible catastrophe, like the unleashing of WMD, wouldn't roll back all that we've set out to accomplish.

A good example is Eastern Europe (the part of Europe that actually appreciates the fact that we broke the communists' backs). It has taken over a decade, but Eastern Europe (e.g., Slovakia) is starting to come around economically and socially.

The fast food, Movies on Demand, High Speed Internet generation just can't consume enough Ritalin to stay focused on anything greater than 30 seconds at a time.

Ronin,
I have the opposite view of fearing a Japanese militarism rebirth. I sincerely think we may have neutered them after WWII. It will take a true combat role before I'll be able to respect the once fierce jungle warriors again. I mean Akira, and Tentacle Porn are great and everything, but the WWII generation will be gone in less than a decade, and Japan's testicles may be burried at sea with them.

Posted by: jackhammer [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 13, 2004 05:54 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?