September 04, 2004
LAX Shut Down - Security Breach Cited - [Updated - 4-]
Los Angeles International Airport was shut down early Saturday because of a possible security breach and a separate incident at an international terminal security screening station, an airport spokesman said.
No information was immediately available on the incident at Tom Bradley International Terminal ), airport spokesman Harold Johnson said.
Officials also did not explain the possible security breach that shut down terminals 6, 7 and 8. The terminals are connected.
Flights were not being allowed to depart, but inbound flights were being allowed to land, said Paul Turk, spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration (search). Passengers were not taken off the planes.
Traffic was being diverted from the airport.
ITV is reporting an explosion. Will update with links, confirmation.
UPDATE:
No explosion, but FOX tv is reporting a "postiive hit on an explosive detection."
UPDATE: Now FOX.com is reporting a small explosion at LAX has injured seven.

UPDATE:
Fox now has this:
An exploding flashlight that injured seven people prompted a shutdown at Los Angeles International Airport (search), an airport worker told FOX News.
Sharon Mayes, parking supervisor at LAX, said two separate security breaches caused airport officials to close off terminals 6,7 and 8, which are connected, and ground all flights. Flights have been allowed to land, but passengers have not been permitted to exit planes.
Mayes also said the LAPD bomb squad was en route to the airport.
It was not immediately possible to verify the report of the explosion. One of the incidents occurred at an international terminal security screening station, an airport spokesman said.
UPDATE:
Reports of injuries cannot be confirmed. CNN has this:
In one incident, airport police were responding to reports of a "suspicious person."
The other involved a flashlight with corroded batteries that exploded in Tom Bradley International Terminal.
Seven people were hurt by that explosion.
Department of Homeland Security had a different account.
The agency said that an explosive detection system machine got a positive reading from a corroded battery in a flashlight.
DHS reported that there was no explosion and that there were no injuries that they were aware of.
UPDATE:
Some flights are now taking off.
So far, the concensus is there was an explosion, albeit a small one caused by corroded batteries in a flashlight. However, there was also a separate incident, with the "suspicious person" that prompted the shut down.
Posted by Michele at September 4, 2004 12:47 PM
| TrackBack
CNN reported an explosion as well. They said it in an interesting way that may involve the news reader misspeaking:
paraphrase "they found a man with something that looked like a flashlight with corroded batteries. He exploded, and there are reports of six or seven people injured in that explosion..."
Posted by: CERDIP at September 4, 2004 12:52 PM
CNN now says that DHS is saying that there was no explosion, and no injuries in the "flashlight" incident.
Posted by: CERDIP at September 4, 2004 01:00 PM
ya gotta love breaking news...Explosion...no explosion...injuries...no injuries...
The dust will settle soon enough and we'll get the real skinny but in the meantime, THANK YOU COMMAND-POST for the updates and comments refuting the updates. ;)
Love this site.
Posted by: Wayne Fielder at September 4, 2004 01:13 PM
I've been following this on my blog too and thought I'd pass this little bit along from my coverage of this:
I have family members that work at the local airport here, so I have a little bit of inside info. The reason everything got shut down was because they got a security breach at the same time they got a false alarm for the bomb squad, and they want tot make sure that one isn't a diversion for the other.
Posted by: Jordan at September 4, 2004 01:22 PM
See? SEE!?!?! THIS is why the blogosphere is having an honest impact on how the news is presented! WOOHOO! TRUTH!
Thanks Jordan!
NEWS FOR THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE!
Posted by: Wayne Fielder at September 4, 2004 01:30 PM
hmmm...okay...so I won't respond anymore today until my Prozac/Thorazine cocktail kicks in...
Posted by: Wayne Fielder at September 4, 2004 01:31 PM
Hey, anytime. More people will see the information here than at my blog anyways. ~_^
Posted by: Jordan at September 4, 2004 01:32 PM
Wow.
I knew old batteries can be bad for the devices they power, but I didn't know they could explode.
Thanks for the public service announcement.
Posted by: Trimblog at September 4, 2004 01:39 PM
Jordan, please plug your blog here ... I'd like to see it. Thanks.
Posted by: Alan at September 4, 2004 01:50 PM
No problem. (Yay, real readers)
The Politicker
I'm currently working on the Russia incident. I'm loking for a relief fund.
Posted by: Jordan at September 4, 2004 03:06 PM
Jordan, re: Russia see further down on the GWOT page. We link to a relief fund.
Posted by: Alan at September 4, 2004 03:23 PM
Posted by: Jordan at September 4, 2004 03:26 PM
CNN is back to the exploding corroded batteries version with several people injured.
Posted by: CERDIP at September 4, 2004 04:10 PM
Officials also did not explain the possible security breach that shut down terminals 6, 7 and 8. The terminals are connected.
Hey wait a minute, there is no Terminal 8 at LAX. Can't the MSM get anything right?
Posted by: Matt Skosh at September 4, 2004 07:35 PM
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.