The Command Post
Global War on Terror
April 23, 2004
Respectability & Civility

Michele and I choose to permit comments at Command Post because we believe the ability to participate in journalism is inherent to the nature of our site, and that the ability to exchange and argue over ideas is at the core of a vigorous democracy.

That said, our comments area is not a forum in which anything goes. We believe the democratic way of life, and a better understanding of humanity, are furthered not by any discourse, but by reasoned discourse. Our vision for the Command Post comments is a forum that not only permits the participation in journalism, that not only facilitates the exchange of perspectives, but that does so as a reflection of human civility.

So: We welcome you to post comments at Command Post, and we encourage you take part in our marketplace of ideas, be you left, right, or center; red, blue, or green; Christian, Muslim, or atheist. If you do, our comment policy is very simple. We welcome comments that are:

  • Respectable: “Worthy of respect; fitted to awaken esteem; deserving regard; hence, of good repute; not mean.”
  • Civil: “Not rude; marked by satisfactory (or especially minimal) adherence to social usages and sufficient but not noteworthy consideration for others.”

It’s a simple policy. It provides an enormous field for the exchange of ideas. It allows vigorous and heated arguments over policy or philosophy. It welcomes the familiar and the arcane, the banal and the compelling, the grave and the humorous.

It is also a policy we will enforce. We will delete comments that we feel do not meet the simple standards of respect and civility, and we will ban the IP address of those posting such comments. If you feel you have been treated unfairly as a result of this policy, we welcome your appeal via email. If your appeal is neither respectable nor civil, it is an appeal we will ignore.

What does the policy mean in application? Where we will draw the boundaries? We don’t know. We suppose our experience will be much as Justice Potter Stewart described the limitation of pornographic speech: we’ll know it when we see it. We can’t guarantee we won’t make bad calls. We can’t guarantee we won’t upset one or more of our readers. But we can guarantee that no deletion or IP ban will ever be because of a point of view; it will always be because a point of view was articulated with neither respect nor civility. We don’t want to engage in censorship, we want to engage in sense.

A commitment to respectable and civil commentary on a weblog. It may sound high minded. It may sound like not much fun. But it’s our forum, and it’s what we’ll allow. Readers disappointed in our perspective are welcome to create their own sites and maintain their own comment forums. Because we choose to believe that most people are reasonable … that they want an intelligent exchange of perspectives … that all things being equal, they’d choose not to engage in an online slugfest of slanderous rubes … we think it’s the right way to go.

So that’s what we’re going to try and create, and if we can’t do so, well, then frankly, we’d prefer not to have comments at Command Post. Because at the end of the day, this is a hobby for us. We derive virtually no economic benefit from Command Post. Our reward, and we presume the reward for our contributors, is intangible--the pride that comes from building something that others value, that is a unique first step for decentralized journalism. Command Post is something Michele and I love, and frankly it’s something of which we want to feel proud. Hateful, biting, insulting commentary does not make us feel proud. It robs us of one of the only rewards we derive from the site … our ability to say, “Look at what we made … it’s good, and it’s a model of what the online exchange of ideas and information can be.”

We will not be robbed. We have anywhere from 15,000 to 120,000 visitors a day to our corner of the blogosphere … we’re more than happy to alienate a handful if it’s the means of creating a forum of civil exchange for the remainder. And deep in our hearts, independent of the fact that such a forum is something we’ll feel better about, something of which we’ll be proud, we also believe such a forum is something the remainder will value, visit, and enjoy.

So, jump on in, but please keep it respectable and civil. It’s all we ask, and thanks for reading The Post.

Posted by Alan at April 23, 2004 06:33 PM | TrackBack
Comments

I dont know exactly what happened today, but I was expecting some vulgar anti-American comments today, about Pat Tillman.

A finer American has never been born, than Pat.
Yet I expected some one here, to demonstrate a lack of class. Thats the trouble with allowing people to express vulgar viewpoints anonymously, like most anti American Posters here do.

Alan, this is your toy, and I fully support your decision today, but next time, please post the offenders IP address, that may instill some responsible posting.

Posted by: Redneck Texan at April 23, 2004 07:05 PM

I just wanted to drop my two cents and say I think your requirement for civil and respectful discourse on this site is right on.

I am new to the Command Post blog (having just started reading a few weeks ago), but have to say that the ability to see what other people think of the stuff going on and make comments of my own is one of the best features of this site.

However, in many forums (even for things as trivial as online gaming) posting can be so intimidating to non-net saavy individuals like myself. Reprisals for holding the "wrong" view or even making small mistakes that identify one as a "newbie" often make people targets for abuse, initmidation and worse things like hacks, flames and such.

I've learned throughout life that the best way to develop personal views about the world around me is to put them out there and let others critique them and bring up things I hadn't thought about. Your code of ethical posting is important to allow others who feel like myself to do so.

Kudos.

Posted by: nadwom at April 23, 2004 11:36 PM

I wonder what a severely negative comment about Pat Tillman by an American means? From one perspective, I can imagine that someone might feel coals heaped on their head when an individual with such glowing options chooses instead to eschew those, and takes up the very cause they despise. I imagine it suggests the very best about that cause, and suggests to the detractor very little about the character of Pat Tillman. It's a matter of focus.

By way of comparison, and just to help understand, it occurs to me that the chief complaint of "persons of great and abiding conscience" such as Mr. Penn, Ms. Sarandon, and the Chicks Dixie, was that the reaction to their acts of sacrifice and passion might actually cost them something in career or money terms, and those consequences so richly earned amounted to... censorship!

Compared to the wailing and gnashing of teach precipitated by doffing such an imaginary crown of thorns the life and works of Pat Tillman seem almost miraculous. No, not almost.

Here is sport. And there, is life.

Posted by: Scott at April 24, 2004 02:25 AM

It's your ball, which means you make the rules, but censorship is censorship. You can cloak it in cries for civility and respectability, but it is still censorship. Censorship ALWAYS starts off with good intentions and ends up in tryanny, sort of like socialism. Good Luck with your Brave New World. Each incident will make the next one easier. Eventually you will end up just like DU. A Sterile, hard core of the close minded.

Posted by: ableiter at April 24, 2004 03:29 PM

It’s your ball, which means you make the rules, but censorship is censorship. You can cloak it in cries for civility and respectability, but it is still censorship.

I guess there are some people for whom propriety is like a foreign language.

Posted by: Scott at April 25, 2004 02:23 AM

And some people don't know the difference between REAL censorship by the state, and the proper rules-setting of a privately prepared forum.

Ableiter, if you have a problem with the rules, go elsewhere.

MG

Posted by: MG at April 25, 2004 02:43 PM

It truly is your ball - you get to make the rules. If others have a problem, they have the right to create their own site (from their own sweat and occasional sleeplessness) and try to get people to read their message.

Good job!

Posted by: Mark at April 25, 2004 04:39 PM

I've had a few people raise eyebrows at my solid pro-Israeli/anti-Palestinian track record in GWOT posts. Also, there's no denying the bias/malice in the italicised and parenthetical comments. However, my response to strident lefties looking for a counter-voice is very simple... build up trust, request an account, and post reliable news items that are on topic.

Oh, and be prepared for individuals who don't quite agree with your position (or the objectivity of your sources) to occasionally take notice and unload both barrels. ;)

Posted by: Laurence Simon at April 28, 2004 12:57 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?