![]() |
|
February 21, 2004
Rumors/Reports that Bin Laden is 'Boxed In'?
I was going to wait for more credible sources but looks like it's about to take off in the blogosphere so here is the rumor. (Please note these are Australian wires reporting that a British paper will be making the official report - if there is really anything to this no one should be reporting on it becuase, well, Bin Laden might have a radio!) First reports; The Weekend Australian and News.com.auand The Sunday Mail OSAMA bin Laden is reportedly surrounded by United States special forces in a mountain range that straddles north-west Pakistan and Afghanistan. Internationally respected investigative journalist and author Gordon Thomas says the al-Qaida terror group leader has been sighted for the first time since 2001 and is being monitored by satellite.Posted by Robert Mayer at February 21, 2004 04:03 PM | TrackBack Comments
Somebody needs to go back to sleep. Not RT but the guy who wrote the story. Posted by: Mike H. at February 21, 2004 06:27 PM If we knew where Osama was, there would be a large, black spot on the ground where he used to be standing. Posted by: popd at February 21, 2004 09:00 PM It doesn't matter. The Last time the Russians sent a plane to fly him out of Afghanistsn. This time the Paki's will rescue him. The US can and will do nothing about it. The Paki's have the US boxed in. It would mean war if the US goes into Pakistan after OBL and that would mean the end of Bush's election chances. Carl will not let that happen. Instead they will just hold their temper until after November and then go for paybacks. Meanwhile OBL vanishes without a trace again. I doubt that they even have him located. It is just to simple to fool a spy satellite. The CIA is stoopid enough to think it can win a shell game. What a bunch of losers. If their was the slightest chance of winning for them, OBL would not be playing the game.
Posted by: ableiter at February 21, 2004 10:56 PM If this is a real story, why isn't it being reported by what we consider "reputable" news sources?
Posted by: tomr at February 22, 2004 12:57 AM Posted by: CERDIP at February 22, 2004 01:07 PM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent. We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view. If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post. |