The Command Post
Global War on Terror
July 23, 2003
Libya Is Learning

Saif al-eslam Gadhafi, son of Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, tells CNN's Judy Woodruff:

"I would like to send this message to the American people and the American government that we, the Libyan people, we want to have a more constructive and fruitful relationship with the Americans. . . . We don't want confrontation and aggression and, you know, to fight anymore. It's over. It's behind us now. It's dead with the Cold War."
As WSJ Best of the Web editor James Taranto notes: "Smart boy. He knows what happens to dictators' sons who do seek confrontation with America."

Just in case you had any lingering doubts, Saif.... As for Syria and Iran, another warning from U.S. President Bush to reinforce the concept.

Posted by Winds of Change at July 23, 2003 02:57 AM | TrackBack
Comments

This is not really a surprise.
If you remember a year or two ago we had some Americans and others taken hostage in the Phillipines by the Abu Sayyaf group.

They asked for somthing like $20 million in cash for the release of the prisoners.

Mohammar Qadaffi sent them $20 million. Everyone thought it was all a scam to funnel money to the terrorists. They figured it was all planned out from the beginning. The terrorists get their money, Qadaffi looks like a humanitarian, and the hostages go free.

Only one problem. The money was all counterfeit.
Ole' Mohammar fucked them over.

I think he realized a few years ago that being our enemy is not a good thing.

Posted by: Penosity at July 23, 2003 06:39 AM

"It's behind us now. It's dead with the Cold War."

No. It will be over when the murdering terrorist swine Moammar Gadhaffi drops dead, with or without outside help.

This filthy dog, just to name a few things, bombed a dicso in Berlin targetting US troops there, gave semtex and arms to the IRA to attack British civilians, the attacks on the El Al counters at the Rome and Vienna airports, the '89 destrution of a French airliner over the Sahara, supported Palestinian terrorists, used Libyan embassies worldwide to ship weapons thru the diplomatic pouch and was behind Pan Am 103 and still has the nerve to lie about it.

The terrorist "negotion" services that Libya has been offering is nothing but a sham as Penosity points out.

Now hes trying to portary himself as a new Muslim leader for the pan-African world... runing around the continent in convoys throwing out millions of dollars in cash like an evil drug lord pretending to be the savior of the poor and fuel an islamic revival.

That man should have been wiped out in 86. Its a waste of oxygen allowing a man like him to live. He may have learned his lesson, but he still needs to pay the price for his deeds. Gadhaffi, may you rot in hell in the putrid juices of decaying swine.

Posted by: USF at July 23, 2003 01:50 PM

I think a pig skin wrapper would fit him just fine. A nice, fat sow. I'm sure our good American friend Bubba can line one up for you...

Posted by: Cap'n SWINE at July 23, 2003 03:26 PM

I haven't been a big fan of Ghaddafi..
but if he is trying to 'appease' us, then I am in favor of accepting that.
He's making a lot of the right noises.
If he follows through with opening up the economy of Libya, I think there's a high probability of the right things happening there in the long run.
I would count this as a win.

Posted by: Dishman at July 24, 2003 04:37 AM

I wouldn't count it at all. The only reason a mad dog like Qadhaffi becomes tame is either to camouflage some skullduggery he's up to or lull us into a false sense of security where he's concerned so he can sucker punch us in some way.
Remember, when we bombed Tripoli & Benghazi back in what? 1986? his kid was killed, and people like that don't ever forgive, no matter what they had done to deserve what they got.
(In his case, the last straw had been the bombing of the Berlin disco USF mentioned above).

Posted by: Seth at July 24, 2003 04:48 AM

Dishman... would you say that if Ghadaffi killed someone you cared about? Im sure the majority of the families and friends of the victims of Pan Am 103 will disagree with you.

"He's making a lot of the right noises."
The only noise I want to hear from Ghadaffi is him exhaling his last breath. My gripe with this particlar asshole is personal.

Sending out the mesage that you will accept terrorists back into the global community sets a bad precedent and sends a message that groups or individuals can use terrorism and randomly kill innocent people when it suits them and then claim to "renounce it" after they have achieved their short term goals and get back to "business as usual" and not being held responsible for the lives they have taken. Arafat is a shining example of this... and we do not need to encourage any more terrorists to follow in their footsteps thinking that one day they will be able to stop looking over their shoulders...

Posted by: USF at July 24, 2003 10:49 AM

The title of the post is "Libya is learning," not "Libya has learned."

These are the right noises. IMO, the US should acknowledge these noises, and pursue diplomatic relations.

At some point in these relations, we must demand some recompense for his crimes. As tempting as Godawful's head on a pike might be, we have to be prepared to accept "merely" insanely large fines and reparations to th families of the victims, combined with peaceful governmental reform.

If Godawful refuses, well, he's outed himself, and if he accepts, he's dug himself too deep to quickly return to terrorism and despotry -- we should have enough notice of any reversal to prepare an appropriate response.

Posted by: TBox at July 24, 2003 11:58 AM

I think TBox probably said it better than I did.

My comments were something along the lines of "What would Machiavelli do?"
I very much remember the Libya raid. I wagered 10-1 that he would not show his face in public for several days afterwards, and happily collected. If you recall the tone of the time, that bet was outrageous. My reasoning, which appears to have been proven, was that it scared the piss out of him.
Now, nearly 20 years later, America is far angrier than it was then. The FB-111 has been replaced with the Tomahawk, JDAM and Abrams. Where Reagan used measured force, Bush's approach leaves no chance for survival.

Do you think he might be experiencing some trepidation?

Posted by: Dishman at July 24, 2003 01:42 PM

OK Dishman.. Im starting to hear you now. Yes, the likes of the 'daffy and Assad clan are feeling the heat and this is paying off. One look at the regime change that a pissed off US president has achieved in iraq does wonders for their IQs. Brains are staring to grow all over the place.

Im still laughing my ass off about Syria turning Uday around at their border and telling him to go back to Iraq.

Personally, I'd like to see a few stray JDAMs hit 'daffis tent in Tripoli to finish off the '86 mission and I have my own reasons for this that I wont go into. Im also well aware that Ghaddafi has kept a low profile so hes been out of most peoples sights and many would argue that we have more pressing concerns. However, I still harbor a lasting revulsion for the man.

Posted by: USF at July 24, 2003 02:01 PM

I was reading an interview with Qadhaffi a few months ago.
He said he had turned day- to- day control of his government over to others, always made a point of letting women get ahead in his country and was trying very hard to come across as a mellow, highly reasonable "elder statesman" type.
The interview was conducted outdoors, under the shade of palm trees, I think, sitting at a small table with a tent in the background, drinking lemonade.
Throughout the interview, my biggest recurring question was: "Okay, Muammar, what are you up to now?"

Posted by: Seth at July 24, 2003 03:01 PM

This is where the Gov't's ability to do two things at once comes in useful, Seth.

One part of the gov't should be quietly assigned to figuring out what Muammar is up to, while the other part pretends its all in good faith and encourages further improvements.

Posted by: TBox at July 24, 2003 03:07 PM

Seth... Yes Ive heard the same too. The guys lives in that tent on a regular basis. Trying to get back to his bedouin roots or some kind of thing. Did you see the all female personal protection squad he has? Its a riot! LOL.

Ghaddafi is trying hard to promote that elder statesman image.. its all part of his attempt to become one of the major players in the pan-african sphere. Buying influence is a part of it and he wants the Pan Am incident to go away without admitting guilt, and Libya off the list of terror states and sanctions lifted so hes free to pump away at his countries oil so he has more funds to grease palms and buy influnce. Of all the people I want to see playing a greater role in the future of N. Africa, Ghaddafi is at the bottom of the list.

Posted by: USF at July 24, 2003 03:55 PM

Sadly, cutting deals with so called former terrorists has become a habit with the leaders of the Western World. In my country we have allowed convicted and unrepentant IRA terrorists to become MPs, we have effectively pardonned their crimes. Perhaps we never learnt that "Danegeld" doesn't work.

Posted by: Max at July 25, 2003 07:38 AM

yeah crazy q did some sick stuff back in the day. I wouldnt wipe him off your hit list so soon.

Posted by: gijoe at July 25, 2003 10:25 AM

Amen......you kill my kid.....I will stalk you... portray a beaten man......until the time is right...then you WILL die....slowly...and I will watch....patiently....twisting the knife.....and eye to eye.....talk to you through your last breath....

Better keep a close eye on this guy and his offspring.

Posted by: Jeff B at July 30, 2003 01:15 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?