![]() |
|
June 14, 2003
Prosecutors: Man to plead guilty to hacking Al-Jazeera site
A Web designer has agreed to plead guilty to felony charges of redirecting traffic from the Web site for the Arab TV station Al-Jazeera to a site showing an American flag and the words "Let Freedom Ring," prosecutors said Thursday Here are some earlier CP posts about the subject from March 27th, March 27th, March 28th and April 5th. Posted By joy at June 14, 2003 10:18 PM | TrackBackMuch as I don't approve of people messin' with the Internet in that way.... GO JOHNNY RACINE!!!!!!!! Posted by: Wolf at June 14, 2003 10:26 PMThat man should be paraded in an limo down the financal district of NYC. Posted by: Susie at June 14, 2003 11:34 PMHacking sites you like -- Bad! Hacking sites you don't like -- Good! Pfeh! How are y'all with graffiti? Approve of it on buildings you don't like, but not on buildings you do? Twittishness, pure and (especially) simple (minded). Posted by: Don at June 14, 2003 11:50 PMTwit-ish-ness? Twit is a term used to make personal attacks. Usually reserved for Aesops' Sour Grapes. So I suppose to be twit-ish, means to behave in a manner that behooves a twit, but not necessarily essentially a twit. To be a 'ness' would mean what exactly? Twitishness. Amazing word choice Don. I suppose you mean that in the Pickwickian sense? Inquiring minds would like to know. Perhaps choosing here to bring it to my attention would be something you would care to explain. You could also describe my mood as perturbed and churlish, but I can not decide if it is exactly twitishness. Graffiti; as in to knowingly devalue an otherwise pristine artifact with crude and lewd renderings would be something you would be more familiar with, judging by your example. Would this by chance be a feeble and misguided attempt at changing the lexicon to suit your desire to exercise free expression? How so? Posted by: devils chewtoy at June 15, 2003 12:43 AMIt's an amusing story and in the scheme of things not exactly worth much attention. Good for a chuckle. On the otherhand. Lighten up Don. ..yep the man got some ball`s,no it`s not the "proper" way to act,but for some of us we proudly STAND UP AND APPLAUD!!!!!!!! Posted by: Rob..in NC at June 15, 2003 01:57 AMGood on you, Mr Racine, I for one heartily approve of what you did.. The problem with Don's posts - what makes them so offensive and downright irritating - is that he often (not always, but often) has a point. Like now. May we always have such "Pointers-out of uncomfortable truths". Don's sometime abrasive style shouldn't blind us to the fact that he's usually at least partly right, and in this case, pretty much 100%. I still stand by the first paragraph in this post though, while acknowledging that I don't have a logical leg to stand on, the reaction's purely emotional. Posted by: Alan E Brain at June 15, 2003 02:55 AMWell, if stupidity is a punishable offense, then the one who dishes it out should not be blamed. Posted by: devils chewtoy at June 15, 2003 03:40 AMCome now. Who amongst us (that could) didn't think about it? I had to work real hard to stop myself DDOSing the Al-Faisal site - but I'm a sysadmin with principles so in the end I traced their IP block and sent the following to their service provider: Dear Sir/Madam, Guess what. Two days later the ISP pulled the site :) Posted by: Simon Barnett at June 15, 2003 08:20 AM*nods approvingly* Posted by: Albeit at June 15, 2003 08:37 AMDon, somehow you didn't read the article correctly. Meanwhile, the Don group holds protest marches, damages peoples property, destroys public property,blocks roads and costs others time and money while streets are blocked. then cries blue murder when caught, and lawmakers have to make more laws governing those senseless marches. At least the money collected can be used to pay for the damages these so called "peacefull marches" cause. Posted by: Kelly K at June 15, 2003 11:13 AMLook, If you knew me in person, I would be the last person to advocate direct action taken against any form of offender. I most likely would wait for the authorities to deal with it. In this case, there are no authorities but the free market, which ethically is next to none. But I personally would love to see thier collectively irresponsible carcasses rot in hell for what they did because despite the collective will of most responsible media, I have actually seen the footoage they broadcast. It is horrendous. I have never seen anything like it. The utter disregard for descency only underlines how great a problem 'the arab street' really is. Screw them. If the one who does the screwing has to pay the price from a freedom loving peoples government, then I am adamant that this constitutes a serious injustice. If I were the one directly responsible for this hack, I would be absolutely confident of my patriotism and gladly pay any price. However, I would not expect my brothers and sisters of freedom to relish my punishment. I would expect them to protest on my behalf. Let us not let idiocy reign again! Posted by: devils chewtoy at June 15, 2003 12:36 PMI think the guy is paying the price of his patriotism. Personally, I applaud him. But, we must follow the laws to remain a civil country. They apply to everyone without exception. What bothers me is these so called peace protestors break all kinds of laws, and get away with it, plus they teach their young to do the same. This is what erodes society, a generation of morons teaching another to be the same or worse. This applies to all aspects of our American society. Gambling, prostitution, queers, all once deemed immoral, has now become "the American way". Morality has been eroded, and this will lead to the breakdown of our nation. Posted by: Kelly K at June 15, 2003 12:54 PMAgreed Kelly; What makes us civil is our respect of laws. What you are describing is a change in the status quo, which these libertines believe will benefit them. It has been done using the rule of 'victimization' and 'oppressed peoples' right of redress. Courts have been stacked for so long that it seems to some as if that is the only 'vision of justice' possible. From that we get 'Universal Jurisdiction' of Belgian courts. Excuse me? LBJ had his War on Poverty, which at the time seemed the only sensible thing to do. Its ultimate effect has been not only to make large sections of the populous dependant on the dole and indemnifide (who is responsible for that?), but these psuedo intellectual attacks against the status quo AS AN INDUSTRY. It has paid quite hansomly to make these changes, or they simply could not exist. What is most evident and most damning as a mindset is that of undermining the will to do anything to save the foundations of our liberty. What is most often the rub are the viscissitudes of the 'shades of grey' within most of thier arguments. Moral Relativity is being taught in prestigeous and respected colleges. There is nothing inherently wrong with such studies, but academes who teach them should be carefully screened for thier predeliction for pedagoguery. Who didn't have to read 'Quite on the Western Front'? Posted by: devils chewtoy at June 15, 2003 02:08 PMBack in the beginning.......of the Iraqi project...I went to http://www.aljazeerah.info/ to see what kind of propaganda they were promoting. It was unbelievable. They were just as guilty of terrorism by spreading hatred and mis information, as the terrorists holding weapons. If I had the ability to melt down that site, I would have. Anybody that had a problem with that.......could kiss my a--. If the law wanted to make a martyr out of me by prosecuting me........no big deal. It was worth the price of admission. Posted by: Jeff B at June 15, 2003 03:26 PMOfficer Don said, "Hacking sites you like -- Bad! Hacking sites you don't like -- Good! Pfeh!"
Hacking sites that promote hatred and terrorism --VERY, VERY GOOD!" Shall we take a vote on this???? Do you suppose by chance the guy that hacked al Jazeerah has been flooded with congratulatory emails??? Posted by: Jeff B at June 15, 2003 03:43 PMI would certainly send him one if I had his email address, Jeff. One thing you will notice is that there are always a lot more liberals and terrorist advocates making major public spectacles of endorsement for their favorite assholes and against the U.S. than there are right thinkers doing the same. Most of us don't have so much free time on our hands, or something, and we have faith in our present leadership to do the right thing. John Racine, the illegality of his action notwithstanding, is to be praised and I hope he does, in fact, get off with a slap on the wrist. Simon, re your email to the ISP and its results: Well Done! Posted by: Wolf at June 15, 2003 05:32 PMI agree, it was absolutely criminal what Al Jazzera did, But yet, the liberals embraced those reports as gospel. It made me really wonder whats happening in our own society. I'm not a die hard Republican, nor a democrat. I see life as whats best for the people. Yah, Yah... I get paid to protect from the likes of the guy, but I think he was not properly charged. Given the way this thing rolls off my tongue, I'd a charged him with splooging. Doesn't Al-Jazeera sound, like pornographic? I'm sorry, but I think this guy just upped his cachet in the hacker's realm. Probably get a job just like mine. Posted by: Dave Dubé at June 15, 2003 09:13 PMKelley said, "I don't think that Americans who work all their lives in lower paying jobs, who get ill for no fault of their own, should loose their life savings because of our system." I agree. I've seen it wipe out alot of people. There are tactics that people can use to avoid losing everything, but most people don't think about it. They have far more urgent problems to think about. Kelly brings up good points, wish I could have had this conversation, I know JeffB, you would like to have a discusion on that too. Bubba, Post a comment
|