![]() |
|
May 20, 2003
France's open letter to the U.S.
The previous post "France Says It Is Target of Untruths" linked to a WaPo article that said, "The French government believes it is the victim of an "organized campaign of disinformation" from within the Bush administration, designed to discredit it with allegations of complicity with the Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein..." The letter from France is here, and their (partial) list of "false accusations" is here. The following are very brief summaries of each: 1. NYT alleged "that in 1998, France and Germany had supplied Iraq with high-precision switches used in detonating nuclear weapons..." Some of these are hard to prove or disprove, but please leave links to additional information in the comments. Posted By Lonewacko at May 20, 2003 03:15 AM | TrackBackHow about Dominique (he's a guy) de Villepin touring the nations of Security Council members and actively seeking their opposition to the US in the UN? That didn't happen? That's how a dear "friend" acts? How about TotalFinElf's oil contracts with Iraq in complete contravention of UN sanctions that France supported? Notice they don't actually deny that. I tell you what. I'll put as much stock in THEIR denials as the French media has put on OUR war aims and actions. LeMonde, for example, routinely runs editorial cartoons that put the Arab News to shame. The French can bitch all they want about our media. Tough tarts. I can bitch all I want about THEIR media and I can make the same claim: the French government is behind all the anti-American garbage they've been running for the last two years.
This strikes me as a government in a state of high anxiety and panic. France's commercial interests in Iraq were linked to keeping Saddam Hussein in power. They protected Hussein in at least the folowing ways: 1 By turning a blind eye to the Hussein regime's contraventions of the oil-for food program, while Iraqi people starved and were murdered. 2 By repeatedly opposing the imposition of sanctions against the regime in the UNSC. 3 By obstruction and sabotage of the allies attempts to enforce the will of the internaitonal community in regards to disarmament. 4 By providing diplomatic cover for regime members by the issuing of French visas,not passports, from the French embassy in Syria. This is how history will record France's cowardice during 1992-2003, including Chirac's personal involvement with Hussein and his family. The truth will come out. It always does. Posted by: TedD at May 20, 2003 05:29 AMAnd how about the disgusting untruths about the US that I have read in the government controlled French media ??? People should be aware that Chirac is always playing to his domestic audience. He's a total tart. Posted by: TedD at May 20, 2003 05:31 AMThe US knows that France is in a weak position at the moment. France cannot afford its socialist dream by relying on domestic tax receipts, and must maintain revenues from its state controlled oil and armaments industries. The US strategy as I see it is: 1 Doing nothing to discourage the boycott of France as a tourism detination, French products and services by American consumers. 2 Permitting the continued slide of the dollar, which will impact very heavily on French exports. 3 Destroying, as much as possible, France's arms and oil industries, Iraq being a good start. 4 Personally shaming Chiraq in front of the world, by reference to classified information already discovered in Iraq. 5 Remove France from the UNSC - this country does not deserve to be there anyway. 6 Work with UK, particularly Blair, to gain control of the EU and to link the EU with US (cross Atlantic) aspirations, along with the wishes of the vast majority of EU nations. In doing this, dilute France's role. 7 Destroy or dilute France's role in NATO. Fulfilment of these goals in the medium term will push the French economy into a deflationary recession (France's economy contracted last month), making it easier for the US to bring in Germany as a medium to long term ally. Chiraq is there for another 6 years and has made France an enemy of the United States. After all, the Germans have more potential and Schroeder is already a dead man walking. Chiraq has done this to France. He had a clear choice - side with the great western democracies, or protect a dictator. He chose the latter and in doing so removed himself, and his country, from Washington's list of trusted allies. French people can ocngratulate themselves all they like abou this but they will soon see what the consequences of Chiraq's choice are. Would definitely NOT want to be French at the moment. OK, I'm out of here !!! Posted by: TedD at May 20, 2003 05:58 AMSomeone call a WAAAAAAAAAAAAmbulance! Posted by: Original Mark at May 20, 2003 08:46 AMI have more questions than comments - WaPo article - U.S. officials said the French program is believed to be defensive in nature, and some of them expressed consternation that its inclusion in the WINPAC report was disclosed to a reporter. It could not be learned whether the Bush administration has objected to, or sought information about, the French program. There is a vaccine for smallpox. I got a smallpox vaccination in grade school in the 50's. Can someone PLEASE explain why these folks need 'live virus' for ANY reason? Maybe there's a lab rat out there that can address this one. I didn't have to go very far down the list before coming up with that one. There'll be more. Stay tuned. Research into an improved vaccine? The current smallpox vaccine isn't very fun. Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 09:40 AMLet's not get too high and mighty about France looking the other way while human rights abuses occurred, in deferrence to its commercial interests. We did that with Iraq ourselves, before Iraq became too much of a threat to our interests. Remember the US gave Iraq "WOMD" to fight Iran, and don't forget that ancient photo of Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein. Or the CIA's early support of Saddam Hussein's rise. Unfortunately, Fance acts a lot like us at our worst. Posted by: Adrian Lesher at May 20, 2003 09:45 AMTbox - Could you include some more information? I don't remember it being all that bad. I got a pock on my arm. Explain please, why there is a need for any lab to have the live virus. Are you a lab tech? I said lab 'rat', and thought maybe you took offense. Posted by: Dave Dube at May 20, 2003 09:46 AMDave Re: why we need to keep small pox around. That vacination that you got in school doesn't work anymore. The vacine is only effective for 10 years. The fact that you are not protected is not a big problem because there is no small pox in the wild anymore. But there are samples around that could be released, either on purpose or by accident. There is a pretty good chance of an accidental release from Russia as the old Soviet Union compleatly ignored the anti bio weapon treaties and huge factories for making bio weapons. Factories that are now rusting away largly unguarded. The U.S. needs to keep live virus samples so that they can make the vaccine again if it gets loose. They also need it so that they can make vaccines for the front line people that are most likely to get exposed if there is an attack or accidental release. ie health workers and soldiers It is only safe to destroy the last sample when you are ABSOLUTLY SURE it is the last sample. Posted by: Siniac at May 20, 2003 10:03 AMadrian lesher we didn't sell Iraq WMD for the war with Iran. We sold them intelligence reports about Iran. Big difference. That's one of the most-propogated lies that was flying around before the war, but has been roundly refuted, even right here on the command post. And Rummy might have shook hands with Hussein, but he sure as heck didn't sell him a nuclear reactor like the french did... Posted by: Rube at May 20, 2003 10:23 AMhttp://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/facts.asp No, I'm not a lab tech. When you said lab rat, I thought you meant an actual lab *rat*, i.e, one of the subjects for various strains of smallpox and other virii used in virulity tests. I was wondering how they would type. Squeak. And I'm not trying to defend France, per se, just throwing stuff out there. Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 10:25 AMThis reminds me a lot of the Democrats whining about people questioning their patriotism. Nobody's actually done that, but why not prevent such an attack by whining about it as being "underhanded" in advance. In both cases, the facts speak for themselves. It's hardly a smear campaign to recite facts, and the facts in this case fully support the conclusion reached by many outside the Administration that the French have acted like a bunch of treacherous whores that need to be diplomatically and politically bitch-slapped. Posted by: beachbum at May 20, 2003 10:29 AMVaccine - a French word. France is mentioned in 3 paragraphs in the WaPo article. One of those I copied into an earlier post. One of those that I did not copy quotes a Frenchman's suspicions that if the variola (smallpox) were present in France, it would be in a MILITARY lab. Hmmmm. Defense - military. I'm really puzzled now. Anybody else? Yo Adrian -- President Ronny sent Rummy to Iraq to offer military guidance and intelligence for one reason -- to prevent Iraq from being overrun by Iran, which would have happened had we not intervened. In fact, we had to take Iraq off our list of terrorist nations at the time to provide such help. The world and its oil-based economy could not afford Iraq in the hands of Iran's fundamentalist regime no more than it could afford Kuwait in the hands of Saddam's regime. Compare the motives of France today (weaken US influence while increasing French influence) and the US back then. Posted by: newguy at May 20, 2003 11:01 AMWell said beachbum. As they sow, so shall they reap. The french are famous for denying the truth even when it slaps them in the face. Fuck em!!! Posted by: Theresa at May 20, 2003 11:06 AMJean-David Levitte, Ambassador of France to the US, states that the charges "all rely on information from 'anonymous administration officials.'" Really? Not exactly. Concerning the Newsweek article about French-made Roland missiles found in Baghdad the French letter says "On April 21, Newsweek reported the “possible” discovery of Roland 2 missiles by coalition forces in Iraq and implied that they had been manufactured in 2002. A charred Roland 3 missile launcher was also allegedly found." Here's what the Newsweek article says "LT. GREG HOLMES, a tactical intelligence officer with the Third Infantry Division, told NEWSWEEK that U.S. forces discovered 51 Roland-2 missiles, made by a partnership of French and German arms manufacturers, in two military compounds at Baghdad International Airport. One of the missiles he examined was labeled 05-11 KND 2002, which he took to mean that the missile was manufactured last year. The charred remains of a more modern Roland-3 launcher was found just down the road from the arms cache. According to a mortar specialist with the same unit, radios used by many Iraqi military trucks brandished MADE IN FRANCE labels and looked brand new. RPG night sights stamped with the number 2002 and French labels also turned up." Nothing anonymous about Lt. Greg Holmes, eh Frenchie? France is stupid. By opening the can of worms themselves they force the Bush administration to really look into each of these charges. Frenchie better hope he's right. Posted by: greg at May 20, 2003 11:19 AMgreg - Frenchie is WRONG on many counts, and I hope 'we' are looking into each and every one of these issues. WHY? Because if the French want to air their dirty laundry and make an 'international' case out of this, so be it. I hope they washed their panties! Posted by: Dave Dube at May 20, 2003 11:46 AMvaccine is a french word, but lets not forget, it was a french canadian who invented it. Nothing to do with France per se. Teenage chicken pox for example, is on the rise, and it could render your kid impotent for the rest of his life, as well as bad scars. Talk to your doctor. Hopefully, things like polio will be gone forever this decade, and there will be no need for the vaccine, but, as long as someone out there has it, and mostly it's from 3rd world muslims, then your child is still at risk. Bubba, Has anybody ever seen this guy: http://www.shanfan.com/nongymn/disney/drawing/lumiere3.jpg and this guy: in the same room? Posted by: Spawn at May 20, 2003 02:48 PMHe's still on that topic dave? I don't follow what your trying to say spawn. back to the pox thing. People don't realize that these things, used as a bio weapon, can cause terrible things to people. This is another thing that bugs me about these democrat protesting idiots. They don't want to protect their children. They cry about an innoculation program. let's make it a law that all liberals cannot be vaccinated, maybe then they will "see the light" Posted by: Bubba at May 20, 2003 03:21 PMSpawn, do you mean the resembelence of the candle stick man and De Villepin? I'm having a brain stall day it seems, I'm not in any way shape or form trying to pick on you, I just don't get it.
What I find amusing is the open letter I did read that article in that second link, and my question to De villipin is, Dad: "Go say sorry to your sister" Boy: "no" Boy: (after sitting in his room for hours) I know this seems stupid, but, it sure seems this is how politicians behave sometimes Posted by: Bubba at May 20, 2003 04:00 PMThis is a good sign. It means that France cares about its friendship with the US. The next step is for the Bush Administration to make some moves that indicate it values the friendship, too., without admitting lying or wrongdoing. Then, we can get on our way. We do not want to lose France. Sure, they are an unreliable ally. In the end, however, we are friends. France stepped over the line with regard to Iraq, but a permament disruption of the US-France alliance. would be terrible. It would mean France would have to face terrorism alone. That said, it will be much easier for Americans to support France in the future if France admits to some wrongdoing with regard to Iraq. Posted by: RF at May 20, 2003 04:35 PMOK, OK, it needs a little work... Posted by: Spawn at May 20, 2003 04:38 PMRF, France have been treating Americans like shit in France for decades... Now they have gone and done it, let them swim in the shit they dumped. As far as I care, France is a truly useless ally and should be targeted the most severe... Russia, well communist shit never changes, and well, Germany need to be reminded with a warning that you don't want to end up like France or Russia.. Posted by: Original Mark at May 20, 2003 04:47 PMmark, How's that for a different spin on things? LOL Posted by: Bubba at May 20, 2003 05:06 PMBubba: Emphasis on "practicing," eh? Can I ask for a reference? //what you hardly ever see, is that in the smaller frence towns, women are being raped, harrased if they don't cover themselves in the traditional muslim burka.// I'd like a reference for this, too. I think I believe it, but I want to learn more. Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 05:42 PMNever mind on that second one. http://www.parapundit.com/archives/001115.html Sorry, but I have enough trouble following the Command-Post to be reading all the other blogs, too. SHIT! I'm bein' WAY articulate over on the Jessica Lynch thread, and you two are over here discussin' rapin' and various and usundry other issues of global significance. Hee, I tried, Dave. I found a number claiming that 90% of France was Catholic as of 2002. My theory is that Bubba is putting emphasis on the "practicing" part, varying definitions of which could put the percentage at anything from 0 to 100. I want to see his particular source so's I can see his particular definition. In other news, I am now officially despondent. Browsing around the link to parapundit I did puts in me righteous anger... and fear. The state of the world is truly grim. Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 06:44 PMFrance was exploiting Saddam's Iraq as a 'colony' like the imperialists that they wish they still were... the mass graves were their fault as their support for Saddam perpetuated his regime and it's crimes they ( and CNN ) were aware of... the truth is so ugly because it was always all about French-Oil all along and they traded profits for lives... Screw them. Posted by: DANEgerus at May 20, 2003 06:49 PMTbox - Being from a 2ndgen FR/CAN Catholic family, I can affirm that Bubba is talking about "practice'. The Church in France has been on the decline for years. I would believe Dr. Bubba's assessment. Whereas, the Muslims - what is it, like 4 days a week for public worship? If that ain't enough to throw the fear of God (LOL) into those French panties, I don't know what will! T-box, And yes "praticing" catholics. I suppose I should post this somewhere on faithfreedom.org, but navigating it is beyond me, for some reason. Call me impatient. I have one major objection to a statement made at that site: that Islamic terrorism is due to the bad teachings of the Quran. I refer you to the article referenced by Cheesebeast in the Lynch thread Dave is so excited about: Islamic terrorism is due to an islamic interpretation of an idea that hit the West first: Fascism. The death of Islam is not necessary for the death of terrorism -- the death of fascist thought is. Kill Islam, and the threat of Christian fascism still exists. I suspect, but can never know, that Islam could have reached a fascist philosophy on its own, given a few centuries, but that it was hurtled 'forward,' if you will, by borrowing from Western thought. However, it is mostly irrelevant as it is playing "the blame game." I did not respond to the Jessica Lynch thread because I find the extent to which it was staged to be irrelevant also. I wanted to comment about how I suddenly appreciate PtG's presence, because after a jaunt through parapundit's linked sites and reading some of the links in the Lynch thread, I find one comment of his very poignant: that we are here in a circle jerk, spouting our own opinions to each other. I keenly feel the need to proselytize my point of view if it is to survive in a modern climate, and preaching to the choir is demonstrably ineffective. At the same time, however, as I look at the monumental task of educating-- no, I'll be honest, indoctrinating people in the firm belief in the dignity of humanity and equality of opportunity, and exactly which actions improve the lot of humanity and which do not, I feel that not only am I not sufficient to the task, but that I would better serve the lot of humanity by simply continuing to be the functioning production unit I am. The fact that being a functioning production unit pays well and thus complements my pursuit of happiness has been taken on board, as well. To keep this post on thread, I would like to say that the concept of "importing misogyny" is deserving of elaboration. Obviously feminist organizations are going to view it through their particular lens, but similar arguments can be made about importing other intolerances that took (and are taking!) this nation centuries to eradicate. France's socialist dream has failed, and its pursuit has allowed fascism a new inroad to the It is to avoid this horrendous outcome that the remaining Core is almost obligated to apply diplomatic and economic pressure on France to mend its ways. Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 08:44 PMAttention France! If you don't have enough gut wrenching fear, try http://www.pushhamburger.com/ It is the first "opposition" web site that I have found which attacks the Bush administration on grounds other than "he's a weenie." True, I haven't been looking very hard, but hey. The one thing in particular that put chills down my spine: http://www.pushhamburger.com/treason1.htm Posted by: TBox at May 20, 2003 10:54 PMFrance and Germany both missed the boat precisely because they have large muslim populations. Those pieces of shit muslims, the ones that just can't live in peace, need to be cleared out, sent back it the shit stain they came from. A war in Iraq would have probably given enough justification to deal with those bastards... Having been in France, its time that a little facism return otherwise their country is gone. Posted by: Original Mark at May 21, 2003 03:29 AMFive percent of population in France are practicing Christians according to: This equates to about 8% of baptized Christians. I Just read Original Mark's post, and am embarrassed to have posted next to that bigotry. I believe Muslims are wrong in their religion and that Jesus Christ was not crazy, but speaking the truth when he said, "no one can come to the Father except through me"--which would naturally be insane or evil if he were not the Son of God. Nevertheless--(or actually because of my belief)--people should look on others with compassion, not arrogance, condescension or an evil of their own. Posted by: yank at May 21, 2003 04:09 AMInstead of concentrating on how abhorent the roots of Islam really are to the average Westerner, I hope that we end up thinking about the future of civilization if we do not allow individual freedom to take root. That means, everywhere. Freedom of Religion, to be allowed to believe in one's inner self to determine how to order one's life, is fundamental. Christianity is based on Love of God, and Love of Neighbor. We are all human with human failings and triumphs. "Islam is a religion of peace". This is what our politically correct politicians keep telling us. But what is politically correct is not necessarily correct. The truth is that Islam is not a religion of peace. It is a religion of hate, of terror and of war." Tbox, I think you miss the point of that site, It is there to expose the Koran for what it is. "This site is created by ex-Muslims to help Muslims leave Islam There are no good teachings of the koran, ALI SINA, the sites creator exposes this. But yes, it is a large site to go through. Posted by: Bubba at May 21, 2003 09:31 AMBubba! I'll bet you're 'glad' you ain't in the bovine biz this morning... If you don't mind, would you be in ALB or MAN ? I know it doesn't make much of a difference to you, but I'm in a state that shares a border with you... I hope you ain't feedin' them little porkers some of their own protein... Posted by: Dave Dube at May 21, 2003 09:45 AMI wonder how many actually rea dthe French document? The factual statements are actually exactly correct. Someone mentioned the roland-2 missiles. Like most US weapons these are widely sold and sales to third parties occur all the time. Indeed, the US, as the main seller of weopons around the world, has been the strongest opponent of conventional arms sales systems that would help track arms transfers to third parties (we already know the Rolands were transfered and not directly sold). Look at this statement by someone who can't read: Nothing anonymous about Lt. Greg Holmes, eh Frenchie? Apparently "greg" doesn't realize that lieutenants in the Army are NOT members of the Bush administration. This is the problem. It is obvious why the crtiques have been leaked (and I agree with many of them) but only anonomously. No US officials would be couagt dead on the recoird criticizing a country for conventinal arms turning up in a prohibited country as this happens with US arms all the time as well. Posted by: gop at May 21, 2003 10:33 AMI have a very peculiar faith. I know God exists, much to my regret. I believe in the Christian message, as it has been interpreted by the lens of the humanitarian enlightenment. But I remain conscious of the fact that the Bible is not an infallible document, at times self-contradictory, and that it can be used to support a message as bloodthirsty as that in the Koran. Witness http://www.concentric.net/~Tycho4/Main.htm (Focus on the column labeled "The Far Right." I note for the record that I am mostly Republican.) Contrariwise, the Koran can be interpreted to support a message as humanitarian as liberal Christianity, to whit, http://www.muslims.org/ Unfortunately, I will admit that Islam is centuries behind Christianity in censoring its "bad parts" from official doctrine. I think Islam can be "saved," as a religion. I remain undecided as to whether it should be saved. On the one hand, it would facilitate the entry of a billion people into humanitarian society, on the other, the seeds of hate would always lie just underneath the surface, just as they do in Christianity. I apologize to all the people I know will be offended by this post. Posted by: TBox at May 21, 2003 10:34 AMDave; I guess we will see how things work out in the days to come. Posted by: Bubba at May 21, 2003 10:50 AMApparently "GOP" inferred incorrectly. The point was France was implying a massive coordination of Bush officials anonymously planting false stories with newspapers, yet at least one of the stories that France cited as anonymous actually had a named source, Bush official or not. Go split someone else's hairs. Posted by: greg at May 21, 2003 10:56 AMGreg you claimed some second lieutenant was a Bush administration official. That was just dumb. Posted by: american street at May 21, 2003 12:46 PMDave etc, Hello everyone. Post a comment
|