The Command Post
Iraq
April 29, 2003
Update on Iraqi protest Story

(Update to this previous story)

Several news outlets are reporting that anywhere from 7-15 Iraqis were killed when U.S. coalition forces fired on a crowd of protesters. Some of the reports say that the crowd - made up of armed school children - fired on the schoolhouse where the troops were headquartered.

Most reports are quoting an AP wire story:

U.S. soldiers opened fire on Iraqi protesters in a town west of Baghdad after being shot at and least seven demonstrators were hit, a U.S. officer said Tuesday. Residents said at least 15 people were killed.

The shooting took place Monday night in the town of Fallujah, 30 miles west of Baghdad. Col. Arnold Bray of the 82nd Airborne Division gave the U.S. account of the clash, but could not confirm the Iraqi deaths.

Local Iraqis said the demonstration was conducted by students between the ages of 5 and 20, but Bray said some of them were armed.

Al Jazeera (Arabic site only) has pictures.

Sky News is the only news source so far to have something besides the AP wire story, but they were quoting Al Jazeera:

Angry witnesses who were burying their dead after the shooting on Monday night in Falluja, 30 miles from the capital, said dozens more people had been wounded and the protesters were not armed.


"Our soul and our blood we will sacrifice to you martyrs," the mourners chanted as they buried six of the dead at a cemetery while US helicopters flew overhead.

At least one person said 17 people were killed in the shooting. Others put the death toll at between 13 and 17.

Arab satellite TV station al Jazeera said the toll could as high as 15 dead and 50 injured.

UPDATE:

[Update to previous posts]

Fox News:

While the U.S. maintains it was responding to incoming gunfire, Al-Jazeera (search) television quoted local residents as saying U.S. troops began shooting after someone threw a rock at a building they were stationed in.

Dr. Ahmed Ghanim al-Ali claims that three boys under 11-years-old were among those killed. He also said his medical crews were shot at when they went to retrieve the injured.

Col. Arnold Bray of the 82nd Airborne Division gave the U.S. account of the clash, but could not confirm the Iraqi deaths.

The demonstrators reportedly were protesting U.S. troops' presence in Fallujah.

Posted By Michele Catalano at April 29, 2003 06:25 AM | TrackBack
Comment Policy and Decency Standards
: The comments here serve as an open forum in which you are encouraged to debate, discuss and post relevant links. It is Command Post policy that we will not tolerate any racial or ethnic slurs or obvious attempts to bait other guests of this site into a battle. We provide you the space here to discuss the topic at hand and to engage in lively discourse. Please remember that your IP is logged every time you leave a comment and the editors of Command Post reserve the right to terminate you ability to comment here if you do not conform to our commenting policy. Thank you.

Note that this protest took place at night.

Who the heck holds protests at night?

It seems very likely to me that the military is telling the truth, and that this "protest" was actually an intentional provocation.

Posted by: DSmith at April 29, 2003 07:29 AM

Following the al-Jazeera link to its story, there is a picture of a funeral and a demonstration. Not being able to read the site, it is not clear if the picture is of the demonstration at which these deaths occurred, but if so I don't see a bunch of children.

But it is likely just a file photo of a generic protest.

Posted by: John Anderson at April 29, 2003 07:33 AM

So Iran has decided to play its cards now, before the democratic process starts to get results.

What a bunch of assholes. This will cause some anti-American feeling and will be widely reported, but ultimetly I have faith in the Iraqi people, who don't want a theocratic state.

Something needs to be done to these Iranian mullahs, they're like a bad toothache.

Posted by: Ted D at April 29, 2003 07:59 AM

Actually I guess it's normal for the Iranians to be panicking at their ultimate demise. However to arm kids and use them to get a deadly response just shows how primitive and screwed up these nutbags are.

State wants to grind the Iranians down, using the natural momentum inside Iran to provoke a revolution. My guess is that there's a level at which Bush will say 'enough' and place responsibility in the hands of the Pentagon. After all it's just a bunch of old priests we're talking about here.

There's a certain point where Iranian mullahs need a message to be sent to them, in the form of a non-religious, secular JDAM. Iranian citizens will applaud us - the Arab world will cower. Perhaps we're reaching that point now.

Posted by: Ted D at April 29, 2003 08:08 AM

Protests are better at night. I've noticed that news coverage is better and any banners you have are easier to read with the sky full of flares. Why we don't do protests at night in N.A. has always been a puzzle to me?? So much we can learn from these people and so little information.

I see the press is easily won over. The headlines are all about the numbers killed and the content is about bloody people at a hospital. Note that it's 'Not' about people in the night 'attacking' US forces who are bedding down for the night. Naw - why point that out? Headline should read - " US troops in jammies attack sleepy kids hugging AK-47s".

Posted by: Eh-Canadian at April 29, 2003 08:41 AM

Just another desperate failed attempt to make the Americans look bad. The Americans have PROVEN their integrity and the enemy has proven their LACK of it.

Posted by: Jeff B at April 29, 2003 09:02 AM

If there has been a victim of this war, it's the international media. I don't know about you but I trust the blogs more than I do the current crop of journos. Somewhere along the line they forgot that thier job is not to entertain or give opinions but to report the facts and let ME decide.

I am absolutely certain that 99% of their time is spent on 1% of the actual day-to-day of liberated Iraq, and that 1% of thier time is spent on the 99% of things I want ot hear about, like reconnection of Iraqi water and electricity, what the liberated Iraqis are reading and watching, what the majority really think of the Shiite extremists etc. It's not just Al-J but CNN, BBC, Reuters.

Pathetic. Does anyone agree with this or am I the only one ??

Posted by: Ted D at April 29, 2003 09:08 AM

Protesters don't carry guns, they carry signs. People with guns who shoot at you are combatants, and should expect to have that fire returned. If they are stupid enough to fire on someone with superior training and equipment they should expect to die...

What kind of idiot reportage are we getting here?

Posted by: Jack William Bell at April 29, 2003 09:20 AM

Oh trust me, there are millions that feel the same way, Ted. This war has been a real awakening experience for most Americans, and intelligent people abroad. The overwhelmingly obvious bias from the above mention media was unbelievable! Just like the politicians that behaved so unbelievably pro-Sadam, there is a possibility that they we're also on the take. Eason Jordan, president of CNN, realized the s--- was about to hit the fan, so he fessed up that their reporting had been lies all along, just so they could get along with Sadam! We cannot let this blow over! I will never forget, and will do what I can to see that no one else does either.

Thank god for Fox News....they have been the most responsible media by far. I will never forget that, either.

I know the whiners will pop up now and tell us how wrong we are. They're opinions effect us about as much as the media that we despise so much. Big fat zero.

Posted by: Jeff B at April 29, 2003 09:22 AM

I agree with Ted and Jeff B.

Posted by: Lee at April 29, 2003 10:11 AM

it occured to me yerterday when i was reading about the money saddam was putting into buying journalists around the world, that this may be the smoking gun for CNN that they dont want the american public finding out about. maybe that is way they went ahead with the story about having to hedge their credibilty.

Posted by: Carolyn at April 29, 2003 10:32 AM

Gee, I wonder what would happen if they "protested" in SF with ak47 picket signs, and being the SF type of protester, started shooting up the hood, do you think those protestors would get shot by the local police? I would think so

Posted by: bubba at April 29, 2003 10:58 AM

Remember during the ran-Iraq war, the Iranian Mullahs sent thousands upon thousands of children against the front lines of the Iraqis. Most of them were slaughtered. The Iranians were/are brutal.

Posted by: Lurch237 at April 29, 2003 12:07 PM

There is no doubt that this is an Iranian provocation. They can continue to do this for a long time, biasing the population against us and bleeding us with casualties. Sort of like a mini-Vietnam.

If it gets too bad, we need to do what was done in the real Vietnam: bomb the hell out of the source of the problem - Iran.

Hopefully we can topple their government first.

Hey... last time they were playing with us, we shot down am Iranian civilian airliner... no... bad idea :-) But we did take out their coastal oil facilities.

Seriously, we need to destabilize that government. The people hate the Ayatollahs. We should arm *their* demonstrators. We should teach them to sabotage public infrastructure - power, water, etc - to delegitimize the government. We may want to quietly arrange for a death or two in the power structure. When it's time for the revolution to start, we bomb the secret police headquarters and suppress the Iranian air force.

Could be fun. Knock down another from the Axis of evil. Free a far more pro-American population than in Iraq. And scare the hell out of Syria, Korea, and France (if their pants are brown already).

Alright... I added France just for effect.

Posted by: John Moore (Useful Fools at April 29, 2003 03:27 PM

Ted and Lurch237,

These events were not in a Shiite town. The protestors are Sunni so it is doubtful that Iranian interference played a roll. This is not to say that the Iranians won't realize the potential of demonstrations that get out of hand to advance their political objectives.

These events underscore the benefits of doing these kinds of things through the U.N. or at least relying on professionals to secure the post-combat environment. American soldiers are not trained to police demonstrations. The United Nations would have a more credible policing legitimacy and the member nations would be shielded somewhat from culpability though international mandate. Blaming the French or blaming Bush doesn't change the nature of our dilemma.

The 'truth' of what happened doesn't really matter. If this massacre wasn't 'engineered' by opponents of America, others soon will be. We have to be prepared to face this. Taking the Mosul massacre of two weeks ago, it seems we have allowed ourselves into a position where we can be drawn into killing civilians demonstrators at the will of our opponents.

Posted by: wetzel at April 29, 2003 03:39 PM

"Eason Jordan, president of CNN, realized the s--- was about to hit the fan, so he fessed up that their reporting had been lies all along,...
Thank god for Fox News....they have been the most responsible media by far. I will never forget that, either. "

Get a clue. di dyou read Jordan's peice? I doubt it. Indeed it looks like Fox's co-owned Sky did a lot worse in China.

Posted by: nelly at April 29, 2003 05:08 PM

"There is no doubt that this is an Iranian provocation.
Posted by John Moore (Useful Fools at April 29, 2003 03:27 PM "

Err what there is no doubt of is that you didn't read the article and you haven't the faintest idea aobut Iran or Iraq. The town is a sunni stroghold with no Iranian influence at all.

Stop making idiotic comments to suit your own ignorant conclusions, and read just a tiny bit first.

Posted by: Silvia at April 29, 2003 09:52 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?