The Command Post
Iraq
April 17, 2003
Lift Iraqi sanctions? Nyet!

From The Australian

Russia will not support a US proposal to lift UN sanctions on Iraq if UN inspectors do not confirm the country has no weapons of mass destruction, a Russian foreign ministry official said.
"Regime change in Baghdad is not a condition for lifting economic sanctions on Iraq," the official told the Interfax news agency on condition of anonymity.
"There is a UN Security Council resolution for this, which clearly stipulates the disarmament of Iraq - something international inspectors must decide," he said, adding that Russia supported the return of UN inspectors.

Posted By Alan E Brain at April 17, 2003 09:40 AM | TrackBack
Comment Policy and Decency Standards
: The comments here serve as an open forum in which you are encouraged to debate, discuss and post relevant links. It is Command Post policy that we will not tolerate any racial or ethnic slurs or obvious attempts to bait other guests of this site into a battle. We provide you the space here to discuss the topic at hand and to engage in lively discourse. Please remember that your IP is logged every time you leave a comment and the editors of Command Post reserve the right to terminate you ability to comment here if you do not conform to our commenting policy. Thank you.

Remember this when the US was blamed for killing thousands due to the sanctions.

Posted by: ElCapitanAmerica at April 17, 2003 09:41 AM

This is hilarious. Wasn't Russia pushing for the sanctions to be lifted while Hussein was in charge? Now that he is gone, they want the sanctions to stay because Hans Blix hasn't woken up from his nappy and said everything is OK?

Stop it, Vladimir. You're killing me.

Posted by: T. Hartin at April 17, 2003 09:51 AM

No problem. We can just trade roles.

Before the war the Russians and the French ignored the sanctions to sell weapons to an evil overlord while the US complained to the impotent and useless UN. After the war we can ignore the Sanctions to sell food and medicine to childrenwhile the they complain to the impotent and useless UN..

Isn't moral equivalence wonderful.

Posted by: Siniac at April 17, 2003 09:58 AM

This is a very good development, it means more trade for the usa.
Don't you love it when the axis of weasels paint themselves in a corner?

Posted by: James at April 17, 2003 10:07 AM

Regime change in Baghdad is not a condition for lifting economic sanctions on Iraq.

This doesn't make sense. Sanctions are placed on a nation usually due to the actions of it's government. Now that Saddam's system is down and being dismantled, the ultimate "punishment" the sanctions might have caused has now been accomplished. The government has paid the final price and is no longer in power. Hence, the sanctions are no longer targeted properly, ignoring the assumption they were in the first place.

Not only that, but those sanctions have been roundly criticized for years by all corners of the globe so you'd think they'd jump up and thank the US for proposing this. For any real economic development to be had, they've got to be lifted. Iraq needs that development as much as it needs a better government.

Russia's strict reading of the resolution sure would have been useful during the debate on 1441 et al...

This may be the Olympic Gold Medal Award in All-Time Astounding United Nations Hypocrisy.

Posted by: Charles Hueter at April 17, 2003 10:29 AM

Further evidence that some inspectors work for KGB.

Posted by: P.T.Burnem at April 17, 2003 10:30 AM

I am amazed that there are not more people who were opposed to this war before it began because they dislike this administration (and I know that not all of them opposed the war for this reason, but I'm focusing on this group) when it puts them on the same side of the issue with Russia, France, and repressive Arab governments. How can news like this not act as a splash of cold water in the face? Wouldn't it make one question the premises of on'es worldview? They certainly have a RIGHT to have a different view (the accusation that questioning this group's logic is to question its right to have a different opinion is always mildly amusing), but I have read countless arguments from that side of the issue and it just doesn't add up to me.

Posted by: ABC at April 17, 2003 10:31 AM

This is beautiful. They were against military action triggered by the resolution, but won't lift santions because of the resolution.

Posted by: MikeAtl at April 17, 2003 10:39 AM

I think we need to call due all those sweetheart loans and put any undistributed aid to RUSSIA (yes, we still have foreign aid going to them) on hold for a while.

It is time for these whores to learn the golden rule.

Posted by: beachbum at April 17, 2003 10:48 AM

Taking an unreasonable position is a reasonable action in this case. The Russians et all have some leverage (the sale of oil is supposedly controlled by those obeying the embargo orders), so they will use it.

It's an irritating speed bump and there are both illegal (i.e. smuggling) and quasi-legal (i.e. "interpretating the embargo rules") ways around it, but it's not suprising that the Russians (et all) would adopt this stance to see what they can get in trade for cooperation. It's the old quid-pro-quo strategy. You always act crazy and beligerant at the start.

Posted by: Frank at April 17, 2003 10:59 AM

We should have a nuclear war against those Russkies.

Posted by: William at April 17, 2003 11:04 AM

Where is Joseph Heller when we need him?

Posted by: Dave Barnes at April 17, 2003 11:39 AM

Are there alternate opinions out there?

It makes sense that the sanctions not be automaticaaly lifted. The sanctions were against Saddam's regime. We don't know yet who or what will replace Saddam.

Who would we release the oil to?

Posted by: Anthony at April 17, 2003 12:13 PM

Anthony, what kind of crack are you on? We're in there now with the Iraqis and will ensure that revenue doesn't go to WMD, the sanctions will only hinder the progress of rebuilding for the Iraqi people.

Leave it to someone on this site to come along and be impervious to common sense. Congratulations Anthony, you get the award for today ;)

Posted by: Ben Noah at April 17, 2003 12:50 PM

Like afghanistan?

Posted by: Anthony at April 17, 2003 01:19 PM

What about Afghanistan, Anthony? What is your point? Instead of thinking you've hit on some incredibly clever analogy, go ahead and carry out the entire thought.

Explain the similiarities between the two countries, and then explain how the current economic situations, threats, histories, etc. are comenserate.

The point is that we've made a calculated decision, the sanctions need to be lifted to enable quicker economic progress for rebuilding the country. Instead of drawing really shallow comparisons to other war theatres, explain with empirical arguments why lifting the sanctions would be bad. Can you?

Didn't think so.

Posted by: Ben Noah at April 17, 2003 03:37 PM

Watch how long this position lasts with the Ivans. I give it no more than 36 hours before they flip-flop.

Posted by: 49erDweet at April 17, 2003 05:44 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?