![]() |
|
April 14, 2003
Pentagon sees end of combat
The Rutland (VT) Herald/The New York Times While this article recaps several recent developments about Iraq and Syria, the most interesting part of the piece are the details about future ground troop deployments. It was unclear Monday how many troops would remain in Iraq and for how long. But signs of a shifting mission were evident in force changes throughout Iraq that reflect an emerging new phase of the operation, in which ground forces will increasingly assume peacekeeping duties even as combat troops continue to root out remnants of the Iraqi military and paramilitary forces.Posted By joy at April 14, 2003 11:48 PM | TrackBack well looks like there going to be there awhile....so much for packing up now and comeing home....lets see will they be there 6 months a year? and lets see how long the iraqis will put up with them there ...before they start crying and bitching...and how long will it take before the rest of the arab world starts crying...and then we have our own whineing fucks here at home...hmmm i geuss this could get messy sorta like a bad marriage with kids. Posted by: aby normal at April 15, 2003 12:04 AMSounds like the Pentagon has go tthe right idea. Northern Iraq is perfect for 4ID, they are most able to make the Turks to shut the fark up. You know that has got them thinking in Ankara: "well, our bluff was called...big time." LOL Posted by: stuart at April 15, 2003 12:05 AMstuart: Good point about Turkey, I hadn't thought of that. Initially it seemed like using 4ID as a glorified police force seemed like a waste of their talents as an armored division, but until things stabilize, it's probably a good idea to have a heavy striking capacity there. Iran will also been tempted to try and slice off some territory if the borders aren't defended. And 4ID should provide a pointed reminder to Syria to behave, assuming they're not dumb enough to not take the hint (given the past few days, I'm beginning to have my doubts about that one). Posted by: tagryn at April 15, 2003 01:14 AMPost a comment
|