The Command Post
Iraq
April 12, 2003
Iran May Seek Rapprochement with US

Iran's Rafsanjani Suggests U.S. Ties Be Put to Vote

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran's influential former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has suggested a referendum could be held on resuming ties with the United States, Iran's arch-foe, the official IRNA news agency said on Saturday.

[...}

Rafsanjani's comments seemed to reflect concern in Iran's conservative clerical establishment that the U.S. government, fresh from its success in overthrowing Saddam Hussein in Iraq, could intensify pressure for change in Iran, which is on its list of rogue countries sponsoring terrorism.

"Iranian officials have adopted a softer approach after the fall of Saddam because they are concerned about U.S. intentions," political analyst Saeed Leylaz told Reuters.

Posted By PoliBlogger at April 12, 2003 08:23 PM | TrackBack
Comment Policy and Decency Standards
: The comments here serve as an open forum in which you are encouraged to debate, discuss and post relevant links. It is Command Post policy that we will not tolerate any racial or ethnic slurs or obvious attempts to bait other guests of this site into a battle. We provide you the space here to discuss the topic at hand and to engage in lively discourse. Please remember that your IP is logged every time you leave a comment and the editors of Command Post reserve the right to terminate you ability to comment here if you do not conform to our commenting policy. Thank you.

The domino effect has just started.

Posted by: ElCapitanAmerica at April 12, 2003 08:24 PM

It just keeps getting better.

Who says war never settles anything?

Posted by: DSmith at April 12, 2003 08:28 PM

Isn't it amazing what losing your temper and kicking the shit out of the local bully does to improve the manners of the rest of the wannabe bullies on the block?

Posted by: Jrm at April 12, 2003 08:31 PM

... and by the way - Suddenly, North Korea is making noises about just maybe talking about their nuke program in a multilateral setting.

Gee.

Isn't that amazing? Who'd a thunk?

Posted by: Jrm at April 12, 2003 08:33 PM

"concerned about U.S. intentions" huh. Well, those were stated back in the Fall of 2001. If you harbor terrorists then you are on our "hit list".

Posted by: TerryE at April 12, 2003 08:34 PM

Sounds like Iran is trying to push NK out of third spot on the Axis.

Posted by: JohnJohn at April 12, 2003 08:46 PM

Our success in Iraq has redoubled our diplomatic power and convinced those at the top of our sh*t list that, they too, best shape up or perhaps Saddam's fate awaits them.

Posted by: addison at April 12, 2003 09:06 PM

..SOUNDS LIKE MAKING A DEAL WITH THE DEVIL

Posted by: Rob..in NC at April 12, 2003 09:11 PM

Iran ought to be concerned.The main Country they have pissed off for years is now neighbors on both sides..

I was on the ocean when they took the hostages.

Posted by: Herb at April 12, 2003 09:14 PM

Sucks to be a Mullah in Iran right now, huh?

Posted by: Cowboy Bob at April 12, 2003 09:37 PM

"the wannabe bullies on the block"

Not really an educated stastement about Iran. Iran has had plenty of opportunity to be bullies in Afghanistan, the Caucusus and make problems Iraq.

They have made noise but actually been pretty responsible.

Posted by: anon at April 12, 2003 09:46 PM

That's what Khatami says. Tomorrow, let's hear what the Mullahs say.

Posted by: R. McLeod at April 12, 2003 09:49 PM

Not really an educated stastement about Iran. Iran has had plenty of opportunity to be bullies in Afghanistan, the Caucusus and make problems Iraq.

I think they have not behaved that bad latetly, that we know, but their not bullies?

Represive religious police : Check
Threat of obtaining WMD[nuke]: Check
Theocracy : Check
State support of terrorism : Check
Axis of evil membership : Check

Posted by: ElCapitanAmerica at April 12, 2003 09:53 PM

This is remarkably sensible by Iran.

Iran is soon going to have nukes, because that is the only way that a non-aligned country can maintain it's independence from the US.

This is going to raise the stakes in the US-Iran relationship considerably.

Exchanging ambassadors is therefore the only sensible thing to do.

Ian Whitchurch

Posted by: Ian Whitchurch at April 12, 2003 09:58 PM

Heh. Nice red herring, buddies. Put yourselves to a vote first, the rest will take care of itself.

Posted by: JB at April 12, 2003 10:23 PM

Ian,

Another way a country could maintain its "independence" from the US would be to stop supporting terrorism. A much less costly proposition.

Posted by: JB at April 12, 2003 10:25 PM

F Rafsangani. Too little too late. Nothing worst than a Mulha friend

Posted by: bob rosenberg at April 12, 2003 10:55 PM

This is great news. Iran is the most democratic Muslim country in the middle east. With diplomacy, pressure and patience - and a permanent U.S. military base near Basra - it might be possible to encourage it to become more democratic.

There is a real power struggle going on in Iran between reformists and extremists. I'm not sure it really belongs in the "Axis of Evil", which I think is a pretty dumb idea anyway.

What axis? These countries aren't allied.

Posted by: skeptical Steve at April 12, 2003 11:09 PM

Excellent, Smithers!

Posted by: Big Dan at April 12, 2003 11:33 PM

If I were Bush I would open up a way for all the "Axis-of-Evil" members to reprise their membership. If they want to be removed, they must show the U.S. that they're not involved in any terrorist organizations or have any WMD. If that means sending a copy of their financial books, so be it. Also, the U.S. should send in it's own inspectors to see if they have anything hidden in the country. If a certain list of conditions are met, they should be able to be removed from the list.

I think potentially a few countries, such as Syria, Iran & North Korea, could be removed from the list if they remove their WMD and help fight terrorism.

Just goes to show you the "good"/"peace" that can come out of war.

Posted by: Anenga at April 12, 2003 11:38 PM

"Iran is the most democratic Muslim country in the middle east."

What the hell are you talking about?
There is absolutely NO democracy in Iran.
Just elections which mean NOTHING because the mullahs retain all the power for themselves.

Luckily, just as in Iraq, the people are sick and tired of the government.

I predict that the Iraninan regime will fall within 6 months, and there will be mullahs hanging from the lamposts.

Posted by: j.pickens at April 12, 2003 11:49 PM

I agree J. You have to be either an idiot to call Iran a democracy or a relative of Carter. Get a clue. Iran is a dictatorship claiming democracy to fool the west. Only BBC will fall form that shit

Posted by: chuck adkins at April 13, 2003 12:38 AM

peopel on this page who call Iran a democracy have their head up their A.... Time totake it out and wipe your face so that you can see better

Posted by: kim at April 13, 2003 12:43 AM

peopel on this page who call Iran a democracy have their head up their A.... Time to take it out and wipe your face so that you can see better

Posted by: kim at April 13, 2003 12:43 AM

peopel on this page who call Iran a democracy have their head up their A.... Time to take it out and wipe your face so that you can see better

Posted by: kim at April 13, 2003 12:43 AM

I didn't say it was a democracy. I said it was the most democratic Muslim democracy in the middle east, which it is. Name another Muslim country in the region that's more democratic. You can't, because all America's allies are less democratic. America has long supported dictators and corrupt monarchies in the Middle East.

Iran has elections. It has a parliament that passes laws. The Mullahs retain ultimate control over national security and other things, but the people have been able to elect a reformer as president - twice. He's in a power struggle with the Mullahs.

No one knows how that power struggle will end, but the Iraq war might just tilt in favour of the reformers. Rafsanjani is very powerful, and if he's indicating he wants a deal with the U.S., that means thing might be changing.

I can't believe I'm even bothering to answer your stupid, ignorant posts.

Posted by: skeptical Steve at April 13, 2003 04:43 AM

I'm with skeptical Steve on this one. He's absolutely right.

As for some others...if you're unable to form a complete sentence (ahem, Kim), your geopolitical analysis really is quite suspect.

Posted by: CINCSF at April 13, 2003 05:19 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?