The Command Post
Iraq
April 08, 2003
NY TIMES: The Americans Saved Me

Iraqis Tell of 11th-Hour Arrests and Torture

Iraq, April 8 — Saddam Hussein's agents were working until the last moment.

This morning, as thousands of American troops moved deeper into Baghdad, some marines said they happened across a building where the men of the Iraqi border police had apparently been busy interrogating suspects. Beating them, said the captives. Gouging them with wires. Burning them with cigarettes.

By the time the American convoy arrived, the Iraqi agents had fled. The captives, some still shackled and blindfolded, were set free.

"The Americans saved me," said Hamid Neama, a laborer who lives in the Amin neighborhood in southeast Baghdad. He held out his hands, which were swollen like overripe fruit. "The police beat my hands, they beat me on my body."

Posted By PoliticaObscura at April 8, 2003 09:03 PM | TrackBack
Comments

thanks for using google to link...

Posted by: Original Mark at April 8, 2003 09:13 PM

To released prisoner: I'm sorry sir, but we cannot know if the police beat you on your hands until it is verified by the United Nations.

(see previous item)

Posted by: Lou at April 8, 2003 09:13 PM

That's it, man. We're sending the LA cops to Iraq. Payback is a bitch.

Posted by: phred at April 8, 2003 09:15 PM

Where is Al Jezeera when you need them, oops, that's right, they don't report stories like this...they only report stories that show video of US POWs being interrogated and their own boo hoo reporters died stories.

Posted by: PoliticaObscura at April 8, 2003 09:18 PM

So, the residents of a hardscrabble, long-brutalized Shiite neighborhood are today "worried that America will see in their gratitude a blank check to remake their country."

Mr. Neama - a day laborer - and who has just been savagly beaten by the regime, has Iraq's long-term future on his mind: "We would not like it if the Americans try to stay here for long."

Not to worry, though, the NYT found Mr. Mahdi, who "stepped forward to declaim that such ambivalence was a copout."

And how did he counter Mr. Neama's ambivilence?

"If Bush just wants to get rid of Saddam, that's fine," continued Mr. Mahdi. "But if he is going to try go alter our basic institutions, like our religion and traditions and culture, then he will have no support." Mr. Mahdi said most Iraqis would welcome Americans in helping set up an Iraqi government that would spread around the country's vast oil wealth. But beyond such help, Mr. Mahdi said, the Iraqis were not interested.

That ought to straighten Mr. Neama out.

Posted by: Ragtime at April 8, 2003 09:33 PM

The word will get around. Evidentually. Maybe.

Posted by: Knitting a Conundrum at April 8, 2003 09:33 PM

"For 75 years I have been alive, and I'll say this," Mr. Mahdi said. "If the Iraqi people loved Saddam Hussein, the American military wouldn't be able to last one day in Iraq. Not one day. We would attack them."

This is from the guy just freed... Maybe he took a couple in the head...

Nothing stops the American army except the American voters... and to that, only near election time...

Posted by: Original Mark at April 8, 2003 09:34 PM

"Even if the Americans win, for two years, we will be fearing Saddam," he said.

And through-out the article he keeps repeating he doesn't want the Americans to stay...

Well make up your mind, you want to be safe or what?

Posted by: Original Mark at April 8, 2003 09:35 PM

One morning maybe 10 or 20 years from now Times reporter Dexter Filkins is going to get out of bed and vomit.

Posted by: Highandhot at April 8, 2003 09:41 PM

Typical NY Times bullshit. Fearing that their article might actual show coalition troops to be liberators, they have to include quotes that show that the Iraqis don't really love Americans, blah, blah, blah. What's missing, of course, is the discussion leading up to that quote (i.e., what was the question posed by that "objective" reporter?). Meanwhile, they correctly capitalize "Marine" in a couple of places, but in a not-so-subtle "slip" leave it uncapitalized in other places? Poor editing or passive aggression? Who cares . . . it's the New York Times. Waste of good trees.

Posted by: SunDevilDog at April 8, 2003 09:43 PM

High&Hot,

I doubt it. New York is absolutely full of intellectual contortionists like him. Apparently even the sight of the WTC coming down in front of our very eyes, of the hospitals and emergency rooms of September 11, wasn't enough to make people like that wake up and take notice.

Posted by: Lou at April 8, 2003 09:44 PM

Orig. Mike:

"Even if the Americans win, for two years, we will be fearing Saddam," he said.

I thought this was a very apt quote actually. I have intimate and personal experience with regime change (Romania 1989) and the previous police state had all kinds of ways of rising from the dead to haunt people (no vampire jokes please).

Posted by: Lou at April 8, 2003 09:48 PM

Lou,
How long did it take before the state police, etc. were finally not a factor?

Also, if you can spare the time, can you please explain what it took to get rid of them? And did they flee the country? Trials? Thanks in advance for sharing what you know.

Posted by: GohomethurDad at April 8, 2003 09:57 PM

We just invaded the country. Wariness about U.S. motives seems reasonable, and we've got to prove ourselves.

If the U.S. suffered through a dictatorship and we were invaded by, say, Russia, don't you think we'd immediately be saying to the Russians, "Hey, thanks! We can take it from here!"

And if the Russians were putting out press releases about military government for two years, don't you think we'd start scrounging for ammunition?

I don't doubt that suspicion of the U.S. and a desire to see us get out ASAP goes hand in hand with gratitude for the liberation. In their shoes, it's only what we would feel.

Posted by: Bruce H R at April 8, 2003 11:43 PM

Hey Low... I'm Original Mark...

:)

Posted by: Original Mark at April 8, 2003 11:46 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?