![]() |
|
April 07, 2003
Chemical Weapons Found
David Asman on Fox: Wires say that initial tests show -- Banned Chemical weapons found in "Albu Mahawish, on the Euphrates river between the central Iraqi cities of Kerbala and Hilla, site of ancient Babylon." Reuters - Nerve agents sarin and tabun -- area where they found storage area.. . People started to throw up and blister when the went into the room. Bret Baier: EPW led them to site. Preliminary tests on substances found at a military training camp in central Iraq suggest they contain a cocktail of banned chemical weapons, including deadly nerve agents, U.S. officers said on Monday.Maj. Michael Hamlet of the U.S. 101st Airborne Division said the initial tests revealed levels of nerve agents sarin and tabun and the blister agent lewisite, Reuters correspondent Kieran Murray reported from a U.S. military post at Kerbala.Posted By Martin Devon at April 7, 2003 01:05 PM | TrackBack Comments
Inconceivable! Posted by: Penosity at April 7, 2003 01:07 PMwell, it will be a matter of moments before teh flamewar begins here, illiciting the post/comment "Well you damn left-wing pinko-commies hippies, what do you have to say now?"
Flame: Hello, my name is Inigo (Muhammad) Montoya. You killed my father: prepare to die. Posted by: politicaobscura at April 7, 2003 01:10 PMWhoa!! Shocker!! If my yawn gets any bigger, they'll have to assign a hurricane name to it. (respect to Dennis Miller) Posted by: johnnymozart at April 7, 2003 01:10 PMIt's a lie. It's a lie. Damn American Propaganda. It was planted by the Jews! Just ask the French, they know that we hide the WMD else where, hmm I mean that we have no WMD. Posted by: Iraq Information Minister at April 7, 2003 01:11 PMWe need to send Scott Ridder in there to do some inspecting for us. He should not have a problem with that, since there isn't anything there. Posted by: Houston at April 7, 2003 01:12 PMI'm shocked...shocked. When do we get to inspect the mosques? Posted by: dmshaw at April 7, 2003 01:13 PMHow do you say, "Damn, Jews!" in French? Posted by: politicaobscura at April 7, 2003 01:13 PMYawn...what is this the 100th "find"? Oops. I guess that should be Scott Ritter above. Posted by: Houston at April 7, 2003 01:15 PMBztera: The whole moral relativism game with WMD's is tempting, but let's not play it. The Iraqis have actually _used_ WMD's in violation of their ban. Yeah, yeah, we used a-bombs in WWII, and France & Germany used plenty of mustard gas before that, but a broad consensus about the unthinkable character of these weapons has only emerged since then. Whatever you think about the United States and its history, there is a huge gulf between WMD's possessed by a democratic state and WMD's possessed by a mass murdering Stalinist thug. And that's just the moral case. Even if someone could prove to me that the USA and Iraq were morally equivalent (and where would _you_ rather live?), the end result would be no different. We would then just be in a morally relative world of Realpolitik, where the U.S. would have a vested interest in stamping out the WMD's of enemy nations. So, I don't really see a case for our allowing countries like Iraq and Iran and North Korea to have these things. best wishes,
btezra, We, the US, stockpile our own WMD's to keep people like Hitler, Stalin, Kim Jong Il, Saddam Hussein, and Communist China in check. Are you suggesting that it would be preferable if we lived under THEIR tyranny? Posted by: Randy at April 7, 2003 01:17 PMPeople started to throw up and blister when the went into the room. That's some strong stuff! Posted by: Bri at April 7, 2003 01:22 PMI still see nothing wrong with this mustard stuff....I mean I have been putting it on my hot dogs for years without any ill consequences. Maybe the iraqis like cookouts with hotdogs and german wursts? Who knows..I cant condemn them for some hotdog dressings though. Posted by: Willy K in PA at April 7, 2003 01:25 PMI agree. I mean, if the police have guns, is it not justified and moral that criminals should have guns? I mean, what is the difference? (And if you can find this argument compelling then you have a serious problem...) Posted by: Michael at April 7, 2003 01:37 PMI wasn't going to flame, but somebody said "Scott Ritter". When we really find WMD, and I believe we will, I want that little pedophile sent to the site and let the real Marines have a nice conversation with him about them. Scott Ritter is a traiter to America and needs to be hung from lamp post and beaten by neighborhood children. The man is the lowliest maggot on Earth. He makes Saddam seem like a "misunderstood" guy. Posted by: phred at April 7, 2003 01:38 PMPenosity, "Do you know what that means? I do not think it means what you think it means." Posted by: FOG at April 7, 2003 01:43 PM"Scott Ritter ...needs to be ... beaten by neighborhood children." Isn't that what originally got him into trouble with the law? 48 stories and counting on WMD "smoking guns" on command post. all of them over 12 hours old have proved to be false. Not one of them corrected. bias? Posted by: double_dark at April 7, 2003 02:08 PMMan, sometimes reading these comments is better than the story itself. Thanks for the good work, keep it up! Posted by: Captain Harlock at April 7, 2003 02:29 PMGraham, Randy, I understand the temptation but you're both forgetting the rule: Don't Feed the Trolls. I know, I know, they look so cute, with their wide, vacant eyes and that disarming, slack-mouthed drool, but we must obey the rules. If you feed them, they get agitated and start flinging faeces everywhere in their mindless paroxysms. It's an unattractive sight. So please, ignore those plaintive if unintelligible cries for attention and restrain yourselves. It really is for the best. Posted by: aelfheld at April 7, 2003 02:45 PMRANDY: I am not trying to play devil's advocate here, but when you look in teh mirror, that is if you are a nation not prescribing to democracy, which there are tons, and desire to gain weapons to protect yourself with or use as offensive, as the U.S. does, with chem. bio, nuke, conventional, why is it always the American point of view and reasoning that is the correct one? We, as a relatively young country in comparision to many other nations, seemingly have taken the view that our way is the way, any other thought or reasoning is absurd. We actually used the bomb in Japan to stop a war, kiiling far many than we believed we would, but we did it to stop a war. Which made it right, but not to those who's children and families were incinerated with the blast. Post a comment
|