![]() |
|
April 01, 2003
Children Interspersed with Fedayeen
From the Sydney Morning Herald Posted By Alan E Brain at April 1, 2003 06:52 AM | TrackBack Comments
The only way they will stop doing that is if it does not actually work. It may sound harsh but firing on target using human shields *regardless* will in the long run save lives by giving those vermin no motivation to use such tactics. Posted by: Perry de Havilland at April 1, 2003 06:57 AMOops, see http://www.command-post.org/archives/003119.html I think on this, the civilians that don't get killed will APPRECIATE the care the US soldiers showed... This will have large dividends down the road. Its the same with wounded enemy soldiers, they don't have to be treated, but when they are, there is a better how that the individual will be thankful. It begins with one Iraqi at a time, then momentum kicks in, and before you know it, you've changed enough of the nation as to not have them trying to shoot you in the streets. Posted by: Mark at April 1, 2003 08:32 AMThey figure they win either way. If the coalition doesn't fire on them because of the children, they win. If the coalition does fire on them, killing the children, then they can hold up more dead babies and say "see what these monsters did" and they win. There is a special place in hell for these people. Posted by: telzey at April 1, 2003 08:59 AM"There is a special place in hell for these people". A place called Guantanamo Bay. See immediately succeeding story, http://www.command-post.org/archives/003135.html Posted by: Alan E Brain at April 1, 2003 09:30 AMPost a comment
|