![]() |
|
2004 US Presidential Election
November 11, 2004
Irregularities | 11/11 Irregularities roundup, Part 2
From today: Kerry campaign lawyers checking Ohio vote. According to Kerry’s Ohio counsel: “[this is a] fact-finding mission… We’re not expecting to change the outcome of the election…” And: “Green & Libertarian Presidential Candidates to Demand Ohio Recount”
Are the provisional ballots in Ohio being thrown out? A new rule for counting provisional ballots in Cuyahoga County, Ohio was implemented on Tuesday, November 9 at approximately 2:30 in the afternoon, according to election observer Victoria Lovegren. Changing the rules after the election might be a violation of state or federal law. Yesterday’s “Even without national scrutiny, counting Ohio’s provisional ballots a tough job” has more on the counting, but doesn’t mention the supposed new rule. That pesky 16-bit bug has unconfirmed instances of “short vs. long” overflows previously described here. These concern Franklin County, Ohio rather than Broward County as did the other suspected incident. For big media coverage, see 11/09’s “Election conspiracy theories persist”, 11/10’s generally content-free “Ignore voting conspiracies and move on” and 11/11’s “Internet post-election rumors missing one little thing: evidence”. The latter discusses specific claims, some of which have been shown to be false and some true. This Hardblogger post discusses exit polling and rehashes yet again the Dixiecrat effect previously shown here in table form. Wired News also has several articles in this category. Posted by Lonewacko at November 11, 2004 03:58 PM | TrackBack Comments
..one only hopes this keeps some occupied for fours years..Deaniacs unite..pack your bags.. Posted by: Rob_NC Obviously, someone in Ohio didn’t read Bush v Gore. Whatever rules you start the election with, them’s the ones you finish with. Posted by: SDN Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) |