North Carolina | College students navigate absentee voting
Jenny Bonilla, writing in the Duke Chronicle yesterday, discovered that Absentee voting frustrates students:
Keith Greenberg was rejected. The freshman's first voting experience, in Florida's August primaries, was disenfranchisement, and he's one of the few who actually know why.
Greenberg is just one of many students who have faced challenges in the election process. Some students, especially those from swing states like Ohio and Florida, have opted to take advantage of absentee ballots in hopes that their votes will have a stronger impact in their home states than in North Carolina. But many are still wary that their votes might not be counted accurately.
In the wake of the 2000 presidential election, the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project found that between 4 and 6 million votes were lost due to a variety of problems including voter registration mix-ups, faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots and polling place problems. Several students have reported that, in their experience, these problems seem far from cured.
Greenberg's absentee ballot for the Aug. 31 primary was thrown out because he did not include a photocopy of proper identification with his vote. Not only did he fail to receive notification until late September, but the state also did not include any instructions directing first-time absentee voters to include a copy of proper identification. The law requiring that "you must make a copy" of such information just went into effect this past January. ...
There doesn't appear to be any criminal intent in Florida behind the problems. Nor at Duke, where slow mail processing may be to blame for the delays some students have experienced receiving their absentee ballots.
Posted by James Dasher at November 2, 2004 08:17 AM
| TrackBack
..hey,dookies..come on over to Chapel Hill..got`a love it..
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.