The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
November 01, 2004
Michigan | Official Preparations

I am an election inspector for the City of Ann Arbor. While I do have partisan sympathies, I will stow them tomorrow as I work to ensure a free and fair election. I have worked as a precint chair many times, the last time in November, 1996.

To help prepare me for the election, the City of Ann Arbor has put me through two training sessions; here are some impressions:


  • Michigan’s Secretary of State is working very hard to assure that no Florida style snafu’s occur in Michigan. The city is actually hiring lawyers to work as election inspectors. Theoretically, lawyers know more about election law; they also are less likely to be intimidated by strident partisans.
  • We may have actual challengers challenging voters this year. In the past, people that called themselves challengers acted more like poll watchers.
  • The police are insisting on visiting each precinct. These visits concern potential terrorism. The city stresses that there are no specific threats of election day violence.

Also, there will IMO likely be rare cases where a voter wishes to vote one way but election law dictates that the ballot be read another way.

  1. One can vote a straight party. Voting straight Republican casts a vote for President Bush.
  2. One can override straight party votes. One can vote straight Republican and vote for Senator Kerry with two marks, one in the straight party section and one in the president section.
  3. One cannot override straight party votes with a fictitious write in candidate. Suppose a voter marks their ballot as Republican in the straight party section and for fictitious write-in candidate “Nun Othea Buv” in the President section.

    1. The voter fills out the ballot.
    2. The voter places the ballot into the Optech III-P Eagle machine. The machine tallies one undetermined write in vote and shuttles the ballot into a special bin.
    3. After the polls close, the machine indicates that at least one ballot includes a write-in vote for president. Poll workers retrieve the ballots which include write in votes and locate the ballot attempts to cast a vote for “Nun Othea Buv” as president.
    4. Poll workers note that “Nun Othea Buv” is not a registered write in candidate for president. They are supposed to note that the voter chose to vote straight Republican and correct the machine printed totals tape to indicate another vote for President Bush.


This peculiarity was not discussed at any training meeting. IMO, it is a clear case where law dictates (in the Special Handling section, near the bottom) that we not honor plainly expressed voter intent. Similarly, if a voter votes for George Bush and for “Nun Othea Buv” as write in candidate for president, the Optech machine will count that ballot as overvoted. Election Inspectors are supposed to revert that vote to President Bush.

I express these items in a more alarmist fashion on my blog.



Posted by Alan Robertson at November 1, 2004 10:44 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Great post!

Posted by: Alan [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 2, 2004 08:05 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)