The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
November 01, 2004
Alabama | A referendum on former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore

Last fall, a nine-member Court of the Judiciary in Alabama removed Roy Moore, the state’s Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, from his position because of his refusal to remove a monument featuring the Ten Commandments from the state courthouse rotunda. It was a divisive issue in Alabama, rousing the ire of religious conservatives concerned that it was another example of secularists pushing religion out of the public square. This election has the potential to be a referendum of sorts on whether Moore still has much support in Alabama.

The answer will come in the fortunes of his friend and colleague, Tom Parker, who is running for Place 1 on the state Supreme Court. Parker was appointed Deputy Administrative Director of Courts by Moore in 2001, and was removed from his position with the state government when Moore was removed. The “Meet Tom Parker” section on his website makes his extensive association with Christian causes clear:

…[H]e was a partner in Parker & Kotouc, P.C., the Montgomery law firm that handled the Mobile School Prayer Case (Wallace v. Jaffree) and the Humanism Textbook Case (Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County). Tom Parker was known for his defense of churches, ministries, Christian schools, and homeschooling…

Tom was founding Executive Director of the Alabama Family Alliance and, later, the founding Executive Director for the Alabama Family Advocates, which are state organizations associated with Dr. James Dobson and Focus on the Family. He lobbied for the family and Christian values in the Alabama Legislature.

Parker’s opponent is Democrat Robert Smith, who has garnered quite a few editorial endorsements from newspapers around the state. Here’s what The Birmingham News - which also endorsed Bush for President - had to say about the race:

Democrat Robert H. Smith is far and away the best choice. The Mobile lawyer is widely respected and has broad experience that will serve the citizens of Alabama well on the Supreme Court.

He has represented some of the most vulnerable Alabamians - children, like his own daughter, who have disabilities and special needs - as well as powerful business interests. Smith promises to treat everyone equally under the law, and he will come to the court having no other agenda.

The same can’t be said for his Republican opponent, who is running on his connections to former Chief Justice Roy Moore and who represents the same kind of ideology and disrespect for the law as Moore. Moreover, he took big donations from plaintiff trial lawyers during the Republican primary, and he has embarrassed his own party with his unabashed association with organizations identified as hate groups.

Smith is a much better choice, and we strongly recommend him for the state’s highest court.

Both men have long legal careers under their belts, so it’s not so much a question of which is more qualified. It’s really an ideological difference, and tomorrow we’ll see what the citizens of Alabama think.



Posted by susanna cornett at November 1, 2004 07:38 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)