Maine | Kittery Town Council Scandal
A scandal has errupted in the Kittery Town Council race now that Former Town Council Chairman Mark J. Sousa has been indicted for using and possessing a firearm as a convicted felon, as well as for obstructing justice.
Councilor Richard Balano said he was unaware of Sousa’s previous felony convictions in Massachusetts - one for assault by means of a dangerous weapon in 1977 and another for carrying a dangerous weapon in 1990 - that were detailed in the indictment. Because he is a felon, it is illegal for Sousa to possess a firearm… The charges against Sousa are related to his actions on July 10, 2003, according to the indictment.On that day, John Dennett of Kittery, who is another former town councilor and a tenant of Sousa’s, told Kittery police that someone shot his motorcycle while it was parked outside his home.
The indictment alleges that Sousa owned a .380-caliber Davis Industries semiautomatic pistol and multiple rounds of ammunition. The charges against him carry a maximum penalty of 10 years in jail and a $250,000 fine.
Environmental lawyer Matthew Brock is entering the race, due to the scandal, as a write in.
Source: Portland Press Herald
Posted by Christopher Johnson at November 1, 2004 05:48 PM
| TrackBack
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.