![]() |
|
2004 US Presidential Election
October 23, 2004
Bush | "Bush Backs Temporary Cards for Immigrants"
WASHINGTON — President George W. Bush told a Spanish-language television interviewer Thursday that he supports offering temporary legal status to immigrants who want jobs that go unfilled by United States citizens. In the interview (Spanish-language version here), Bush also mentions that this would take the pressure off our borders and would allow these workers to send their money back to their home countries (a.k.a. “remittances”). In January at a Cato Institute conference, Margaret Spellings, assistant to the president for domestic policy, discussed Bush’s guest worker plan:
Spellings: “We do envision that [the Bush guest worker plan] would be open to any type of employee and any type of employer, such as nurses, teachers, high-tech workers, low-skilled workers. This is a concept that can apply broadly” In an interview last month, Homeland Security Undersecretary Asa Hutchinson (the “border czar”) said the following:
“I think [the American public has] too much compassion to tell our law-enforcement people to go out there and uproot those 8 million [illegal aliens here] — some of whom might have been here 8 or 12 years, who got kids here that are American citizens — and to send them out of the country.” The details of how the administration would deal with guest workers who have overstayed the term of their work permit - especially those who have had U.S. citizen children - has not been disclosed. See also Analysis: Bush temp worker plan open-ended:
Neither Bush nor the two senior administration officials who briefed the media Tuesday [in January 2004], however, made any suggestion that employers wishing to bring in workers from overseas would be required to first offer wages high enough to attract American workers. The only specific requirement that the senior officials mentioned was that the job offer meet the minimum wage. At the federal minimum of $5.15 per hour, a full-time worker earns $10,712 per year, well under the official poverty line for a family of three of $15,260. Whether Bush’s plan meets the formal definition of amnesty or not, many do perceive it as an amnesty. Internal Border Patrol memos say that many are prepared to come to the U.S. to take advantage of any program that is perceived as amnesty: “Border Agents Warn of Influx”. Regarding remittances:
Remittances rose to four-fifths the value of oil exports in the first half of the year, according to the Bank of Mexico. Remittances have surpassed foreign investment and tourism revenues, and are the second-largest source of foreign income, behind oil. Other countries receive an even greater share. Remittances represent about 29% of El Salvador’s GDP. Some, such as Dan Griswold at the Cato conference, say that remittances are good and a replacement for foreign aid. As pointed out here and here, others say they create an unhealthy dependency and have other negative impacts. Some say that one half of the residents of the Mexican state of Zacatecas reside in the U.S. That’s caused internal migration as Indians from southern Mexico move into that state to do the work previously done by Zacatecans: “Mexico’s other migrant wave” See also “The Big Show on the Border” and regarding the general topic of guest worker plans, see “The Mirage of Mexican Guest Workers”, “Guest worker program offers lessons: Bush might profit by German experience”, and “Unemployed in the U.S.: Guestworker amnesty not wanted, not needed” Posted by Lonewacko at October 23, 2004 03:38 AM | TrackBack Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) |