The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
September 27, 2004
| Transcript of the President's Interview with Bill O'Reilly

Courtesy Fox News. This is part I of the interview. Part II will air tomorrow evening, part III on Wednesday.

——-
This is a partial transcript from the September 27, 2004 edition of “The O’Reilly Factor,” that has been edited for clarity.

Watch Part II and III of the interview on Tuesday, September 28 and Wednesday, September 29 at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET! Catch “The O’Reilly Factor” weeknights at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET and listen to the “Radio Factor” weekdays on Westwood One.

BILL O‘REILLY, HOST: Okay. First of all, I want to thank you for talking with me.

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH : [chuckles]

O’REILLY: So few people will.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, there’s, uh, it’s a big gamble on my part.

O’REILLY: No, it isn’t, not really though. You, we talked four and a half years ago,

PRESIDENT BUSH: I’m teasing.

O’REILLY: Uh, yeah, when you,

PRESIDENT BUSH: I, I enjoy, I enjoy how you interview people, and I uh, appreciate you giving me the chance to come on and have what we say in Texas, just a visit.

O’REILLY: Yeah. We’re going to have a visit here. I’ve got fifteen questions for you. If they’re dumb, tell me they’re dumb. Because the audience will like that.

PRESIDENT BUSH: [Chuckles]

O’REILLY: If they’re dumb questions, look that’s just dumb. Um, the first one is, according to a poll taken by the Coalition Authority (search) last spring, only five percent of the Iraqi people see the United States as liberators. Are you surprised they don’t appreciate the American sacrifice more?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I, I think they’re beginning to, appreciate the sacrifice, because the country is getting better. It’s tougher than heck right now, because Zarqawi (search) and some of these former Baathists are killing innocent Iraqis and killing our soldiers in order to try to get us to leave. Um, I also saw a poll where it said by far the vast majority of the Iraqis believe the world is getting better. And that’s positive. In other words, people are beginning to see progress. Electricity is better, schools are opening, hospitals are running. Um, I think when it’s all said and done, the Iraqis are going to look back and say thank God for America.

O’REILLY: How long is it going to take before that happens, do you think?

PRESIDENT BUSH: You know, it’s uh, as soon as possible. Now, I think the elections are going to have uh, uh you know, a very positive effect, and they take place in January, and, but the people want to vote.

O’REILLY: But can they vote when people are being blown up,

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: And these guys are threatening them, then they vote,

PRESIDENT BUSH: That’s when you’re supposed to vote. You’ve got to stand tough with these terrorists. You cannot allow the terrorists to dictate whether or not a society can be free or not. Do you remember what happened in Afghanistan when the Taliban pulled the four women off the bus and killed them because they had voter registration cards? I think there had been about three million Afghan citizens who had registered at this point in time. A lot of people said, well, the elections look like they’ve got to be over in Afghanistan, because the Taliban is, too violent to allow the elections to go forward. Today ten million citizens, [OVERLAPPING VOICES] in that country have registered to vote, forty percent of whom are women, which is a powerful statistic.

O’REILLY: The South Vietnamese didn’t fight for their freedom, which is why they don’t have it today.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: Do you think the Iraqis are going to fight for their freedom?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Absolutely.

O’REILLY: You do.

PRESIDENT BUSH: No question in my mind, they will, you bet. I was with Prime Minister Allawi (search) yesterday, he is a tough guy. He is a strong leader. He believes the future of Iraq is the future of freedom, and he tells me that, you know that these places where they go bomb the recruits, the people trying to sign up to serve in the army or the police, the next day, more recruits come.

O’REILLY: Okay.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Because people want to defend their country. I believe that. You know why I believe that, and this is really important, uh, uh, it’s because, I believe everybody yearns to be free. I believe Muslims yearn to be free. And I, and this is tough, look, no question it’s tough times. But if we send mixed signals, if we waver, the times will be tougher. That’s what the terrorists are watching, they’re watching us like hawks.

O’REILLY: What happened to Saddam’s chemical arsenal, do you know?

PRESIDENT BUSH: No. I don’t. We thought we’d have stockpiles, uh, we do know he had the capability of making weapons. And that capability could have been passed on to terrorists, and that was a risk, after 9/11, we could not afford to take.

O’REILLY: No I understand that. But you, to this day, don’t know what happened to his chemical weapons. He didn’t tell us, and, and,

PRESIDENT BUSH: No. Not yet.

O’REILLY: He hasn’t given us much, has he?

PRESIDENT BUSH: No, he, well he doesn’t have anything, you know, doesn’t have anything to, to gain by giving us much, I mean, he’s, he’s going to go on trial, and the Iraqis will lay out a case, and, you know, I mean, why would he, why would he tell the truth?

O’REILLY: “The Wall Street Journal” says, and that’s a conservative paper, that uh, the Defense Department and the Pentagon wasn’t aggressive enough in getting al-Sadr and then crushing Fallujah.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: Is the “Journal” wrong?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I, I think this uh, I think that the, government of Iraq, Allawi, did a good job in Najaf with Sadr. In other words, they now control the shrines, and they did so in a way that he, Allawi, thought would be best for the political process. In other words, there’s a dual track here. There’s a political process going forward, and a security operation going forward. And the two must be parallel, and uh, Allawi made the decision that the best operation in Najaf uh would be to, the way we handled it, and uh, if they’re saying that maybe last fall we should have moved on Sadr, it’s a judgment call that you know, history will have to look back on.

O’REILLY: Fallujah? Should we have crushed it when we could have?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, there again, there was a dual track with uh, a political process going forward, a lot of people on the ground there thought that if we’d have gone into Fallujah at the time, the uh, interim government would not have been established, and if the government would not have been established, we wouldn’t have been able to transfer sovereignty. I happen to think the transfer of sovereignty is a key moment in this, history of a free Iraq. The reason I believe that is that the Iraq people are going to follow uh Iraqi leadership, not U.S. leadership. And uh, Prime Minister Allawi’s been there for about two and a half months, nearly three months, he’s getting his feet on the ground, he’s establishing a government, they’re training police, they’re training army, they’re beginning to move out in, in places like Sumaria and Najaf in order to make the place a more peaceful, peaceful country.

O’REILLY: The mission accomplished statement in May 2003, if you had to do it all over again, would you not have done it?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Uh, well first of all, the statement said, Thank you for be, serving in Afghanistan and Iraq, thank you for being on one of the largest, longest cruises in our nation’s history. Thank you for serving our country, and we’ve still got tough work in Iraq. Now I’m, I’m going to go and thank our troops every chance I get.

O’REILLY: But the press spinned it, you know how they spinned it.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, they spin everything.

O’REILLY: Me too.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, [chuckles] I understand, you know, maybe you deserve it more than me, but nevertheless, [chuckles] look I, I,

O’REILLY: [OVERLAPPING VOICES] You’ve taken some heat for that.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I take heat for a lot of things, and uh,

O’REILLY: Would you do it again?

PRESIDENT BUSH: You mean have the sign up there?

O’REILLY: No, no, but go in there with the flight jacket,

PRESIDENT BUSH: Absolutely.

O’REILLY: You would.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Of course. I’m saying to the troops, on this carrier and elsewhere, thanks for serving America. Absolutely.

O’REILLY: Okay.

PRESIDENT BUSH: And by the way, those sol, those uh sailors and airmen, loved seeing the Commander in Chief.

O’REILLY: Oh, that’s [INAUDIBLE]

PRESIDENT BUSH: These kids had been on a very long cruise. They’d been on a cruise to both, in two theaters of war now, Afghanistan and Iraq. I flew out there, and said, thanks. Thanks on behalf of a grateful nation. You bet I’d do it again.

O’REILLY: This is really a tough one.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Okay. [chuckles]

O’REILLY: Iran. Uh, said yesterday, hey, we’re going to develop this nuclear stuff, we don’t care what you think. You ready to use military force against Iran if they continue to defy the world on nuclear?

PRESIDENT BUSH: My hope is that we can solve this diplomatically.

O’REILLY: But if you can’t.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, let me try to solve it diplomatically first. All options are on the table, of course, in any situation. But diplomacy is the first option.

O’REILLY: Would you allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon?

PRESIDENT BUSH: We, we are working our hearts out so that they don’t develop a nuclear weapon, and the best way to do so is to continue to keep international pressure on them.

O’REILLY: Is it conceivable that you would allow them to develop a nuclear weapon?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Uh, no, we’ve made it clear, our position is that they won’t have a nuclear weapon.

O’REILLY: Period.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Yeah.

O’REILLY: A “Time” magazine investigation says, three million illegal aliens crossed the Mexican border, and we talked about this four and a half years,

PRESIDENT BUSH: We have, I know, it’s a issue that you’re concerned about.

O’REILLY: Every year, three and a half million illegals come over. Why can’t the federal government control that?

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, as you know, as the governor of Texas, I was very aware of this issue, there is a long border, that makes it hard to control. We have beefed up places along the border to try to stop the process of, of, of uh, of uh,

O’REILLY: With all due respect though, it’s not working.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well,

O’REILLY: Three million people.

PRESIDENT BUSH: It’s working a little better, they’re doing a pretty good job down in Arizona, which is the main border crossing, but I was trying to get my words here for a minute. Trying to give you some facts that would, I think there’s a thousand more border patrol agents along the border, we’re modernizing border techniques, we’re using better surveillance methods to stop this, crossing at the border. Now look, people are coming up because they want to work. You know, that, family values don’t stop at the border.

O’REILLY: Absolutely,

PRESIDENT BUSH: If you can make fifty cents in the interior of Mexico, and five bucks in uh, the interior of the United States, you’re coming for the five bucks, and they’re poor.

O’REILLY: Ninety percent of them are, but ten percent are bad guys.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well, look, look,

O’REILLY: A lot of bad guys coming here.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I don’t know how you got the ten percent number, maybe,

O’REILLY: The border patrol you know, incarceration, violent crime, that,

PRESIDENT BUSH: No question about it. It is a ter, serious issue. I happen to believe the best way to enhance the border is to have temporary worker cards available for people. And uh, I think it’s best for the employers who are employing these people, I think it’s best for the employees that are trying to find work. I think the long-term solution for this issue on our border is for Mexico to grow a middle class, that’s why I believe in NAFTA (search),

O’REILLY: We’ll be in the grave.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I don’t think so, it’s happening. Look, you, I wish I could have taken you down there and shown you the, the northern tier of states in Mexico, uh, ten years ago compared to today. I mean, it, it’s happening.

O’REILLY: You,

PRESIDENT BUSH: Free trade helps lift, lives, free trade develops commerce, free trade gives people a chance to realize their dreams. And so long as the wage differential is as big as it is, and so long as moms and dads feel the, necessity to feed their children, they’re going to come and try to make a living.

O’REILLY: So you’re not going to military militarize the border to stop,

PRESIDENT BUSH: No, we’re going to use the border patrol and beef it up, and make it, give it better technologies and better equipment to do its job.

O’REILLY: Okay. You know a lot of people are not going to like that answer, you know that.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Well it’s a, a truthful answer.

O’REILLY: Okay. Um,

PRESIDENT BUSH: I mean, as opposed as to what, putting a military on the border,
O’REILLY: Yeah, military to back up the border patrol, to just stop the, the, rampant,

PRESIDENT BUSH: No, I think the best way to do it is to give the border patrol the assets it needs to do its job.

——

For an alternative take on the interview, try here.



Posted by Michele at September 27, 2004 08:23 PM | TrackBack
Comments

..the man will go down in the annals of history as one of the greatest men this country has produced..the man is human and is rock solid,straight shooter,and most of all believes in freedom and will defend it with whatever it takes..

Posted by: Rob_NC [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 27, 2004 08:55 PM

… and to hell with “nuance.”

Posted by: gus3 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 12:00 AM

“rock solid, straight shooter”

Absolutely! Very impressive.

Ditto on the “nuance.”

Posted by: Jim [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 01:09 AM

Is it me or are there way too many “Um” and “Uh”s in this interview?

Posted by: v [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 11:11 AM

v-

re: the “Um” and “Uh”s - Written out, these asides look strange and as though someone was groping for words. But that’s not what happened at all.

You really have to listen to a tape of the interview or see it on TV to know that this was just a give and take conversation. When heard, the interview sounds quite normal or smooth and somewhat rapid paced actually.

Posted by: Jim [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 11:44 AM

Bush’s comments on the border situation are ridiculous. 3 million people coming across every year. We have about 6,900 border patrol agents for the southern border. We have al-Qaeda running around in South America creating cells and planning to sneak across and commit terrorist acts in our country. We have rampant welfare fraud, closing hospitals due to illegals and pressure on the wages of the lowest paid among us.

All Bush can say is “No, we’re going to use the border patrol and beef it up, and make it, give it better technologies and better equipment to do its job.”

Lets beef it up, say we double it, then we’ll only have 1.5 million crossing every year. Why don’t you actually SOLVE the problem Mr. Bush instead of just continuing on the same path that isn’t working?

Damn this issue pisses me off so much! And yes I’m still voting for Bush :\

Posted by: Digger [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 12:37 PM

The border is a tough and complex issue. I believe that I have the bona fides to speak to it because I worked in health care in two large cities very close to the border.

While it is true that illegal immigrants do cost hospitals significant amounts in uncompensated care, what’s also an issue is the idiotic federal regulations that make it difficult for hospitals to discharge mexican immigrants who don’t have a support network in the US or Mexico.

Long term, Bush is right, only an improved Mexican economy will ultimately normalize this situation. O’reilly’s right, we’ll be in our graves before that happens.

And why? Because the porous border acts as a safety valve for the corrupt Mexican government. They don’t have to deal with the social issues that have created the enormous disparity between the rich and poor because the poor can come here to survive.

So closing down the border will put pressure on Mexico to reform, eventually. I think this is the right thing. mexico has everything it needs to be a prosperous country. The vestigal socialist government and the rich who wish to stay that way have a vested interest in the status quo. Therefore no progress.

But I also understand Bush’s POV. Many of these folks are here already. To some extent our economy relies on this source of labor. The adjustment we’d have to make might be more painful that many of us imagine. Further, Bush really does believe in people and perhaps this is a blindspot for him.

A complex issue, no doubt about it.

Posted by: skip [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 28, 2004 01:25 PM

“Many of these folks are here already. To some extent our economy relies on this source of labor. The adjustment we’d have to make might be more painful that many of us imagine.”

More painful than a terrorist coming across with a “dirty bomb” and blowing the hell out of a major city?

More painful than terrorists taking hostage a school like in Beslan, Russia?

It’s not just a matter of workers it’s a matter of security. I agree with you on Mexico needing to do its part. I understand the “they make more here that’s why they come” argument. But in these times there is no excuse for not being 100% certain of who is coming across our borders and doing what is necessary to implement security measures rather than just shrugging it off.

Posted by: Digger [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 29, 2004 02:10 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)