![]() |
|
2004 US Presidential Election
September 20, 2004
| Transcript of Rather's Statement Tonight
From Rather Biased via Mudville Gazette: DAN RATHER: Now, news about CBS News, and the questions surrounding documents we aired on this broadcast and on the wednesday edition of “60 minutes” on September 8. The documents purported to show that George W. Bush received preferential treatment during his years in the national guard. At the time, CBS news and this reporter fully believed the documents were genuine. Tonight, after further investigation, we can no longer say that. The documents were provided to CBS news by a former commander in the Texas National Guard, Bill Burkett. Burkett is well known in National Guard circles for a long battle over his medical benefits, and for trying, for several years now, to discredit President Bush’s military service record. Burkett initially told CBS news he got the documents from a fellow guardsman. But when we interviewed Burkett this past weekend, he changed his story, and told us he got the documents from a different source, one we cannot verify. Why did Burkett tell CBS news something he now says is not true? We put the question to him. (from interview) Why did you mislead us? BILL BURKETT: Well, I didn’t totally mislead you. I misled you on the one individual. You know, your staff pressured me to a point to reveal that source. RATHER: Well, we were trying to get the chain of possession. BURKETT: I understand that. RATHER: And you said that you had received them from someone. BURKETT: I understand that. RATHER: We did pressure you to say, well, you received them from someone. BURKETT: Yes. RATHER: And it’s true, we pressured you. It was a very important point for us. BURKETT: Yes. And I simply threw out a name. That was basically, I guess, to take a little pressure off for a moment. RATHER: Have you forged anything? BURKETT: No, sir. RATHER: He you faked anything? BURKETT: No, sir. RATHER: But you did mislead us. BURKETT: Yes, I misled. RATHER: You lied to us. BURKETT: Yes, I did. RATHER: Now, if you would misled us about that, which is critical, why would I or anyone believe that you wouldn’t mislead us about something else? BURKETT: I could understand that question. I can’T… that’s going to have to be your judgment and anybody else’s. RATHER: Burkett still insists the documents are real, but now says he was in no position to verify them. BURKETT: I also insisted when I sat down with your staff in the first face-to-face session, before I gave up any documents, I wanted to know what you were going to do with them, and I insisted that they be authenticated. RATHER: The failure of CBS News to do just that, to properly scrutinize the documents and their source, led to errors in our reporting. CBS News deeply regrets it. Also I want to say personally and directly, I’m sorry. CBS News President Andrew Heyward has ordered an investigation to examine the process by which the report was prepared. It will be made public. This was an error made in good faith as we try to carry on the CBS News tradition of asking tough questions and investigating reports. But it was a mistake. Now, some reaction to our revelations today. It comes from a spokesman for President Bush, Scott McClellan. SCOTT McCLELLAN (White House Spokesman): Obviously there are still a number of questions that need to be answered, and we look forward to seeing the results of the investigations that other media organizations have undertaken, and that CBS says that they are now undertaking. We appreciate the fact that they have said they deeply regret it, but we still want to see those questions answered. RATHER: And Scott McClellan repeated the the White House insistence that President Bush fulfilled his obligation to the National Guard and he was honorably discharged. *** Draw your own conclusions. Posted by Michele at September 20, 2004 06:55 PM | TrackBack Comments
“The documents were provided to CBS news by a former commander in the Texas National Guard, Bill Burkett. Burkett is well known in National Guard circles for a long battle over his medical benefits, and for trying, for several years now, to discredit President Bush’s military service record.” THESE are the “unimpeachable sources?” I had to read this thing through twice before I realized it was not a Scrappleface-type joke. Thanks for posting this - now I don’t have to watch Dan tonight. Posted by: samuelv now I don’t have to watch Dan tonight. Why would you think you have to watch him at all? Posted by: gus3 Where’s the apology to President Bush? Damn. I wish, instead, halfway through the playactin..er…falling on swords…er… INTERVIEW (yeah, that’s the ticket, INTERVIEW) the Feds had showed up to perp-walk Dannyboy and BonkersBurkett to lockup. Posted by: Darleen Not enough. Two days ago they said ‘unimpeachable’….I guess they’ve been PEACHED huh. My guess is Mary Beth Cahill is involved in this along with that scumbag Cleland..(using Teresa’s favorite line… ha ha). Keep the pressure up people. Partisans have lied…partisans are lying now….how can anyone doubt a big lib like Rather didn’t know what he was trying to put forward to the American people. He is a shameless old man. Posted by: dickmr I watched the airing and something Dan Rather said is not in this transcript (or my eyes are very tired). He said, “Mr Burkett did not contact us, we contacted Mr Burkett.” How did CBS find out about Mr. Burkett having documents that would “support” their story? Posted by: JustWondering Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) |