The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
September 20, 2004
| Transcript of Rather's Statement Tonight

From Rather Biased via Mudville Gazette:

DAN RATHER: Now, news about CBS News, and the questions surrounding documents we aired on this broadcast and on the wednesday edition of “60 minutes” on September 8. The documents purported to show that George W. Bush received preferential treatment during his years in the national guard.

At the time, CBS news and this reporter fully believed the documents were genuine. Tonight, after further investigation, we can no longer say that. The documents were provided to CBS news by a former commander in the Texas National Guard, Bill Burkett. Burkett is well known in National Guard circles for a long battle over his medical benefits, and for trying, for several years now, to discredit President Bush’s military service record.

Burkett initially told CBS news he got the documents from a fellow guardsman. But when we interviewed Burkett this past weekend, he changed his story, and told us he got the documents from a different source, one we cannot verify. Why did Burkett tell CBS news something he now says is not true? We put the question to him.

(from interview)

Why did you mislead us?

BILL BURKETT: Well, I didn’t totally mislead you. I misled you on the one individual. You know, your staff pressured me to a point to reveal that source.

RATHER: Well, we were trying to get the chain of possession.

BURKETT: I understand that.

RATHER: And you said that you had received them from someone.

BURKETT: I understand that.

RATHER: We did pressure you to say, well, you received them from someone.

BURKETT: Yes.

RATHER: And it’s true, we pressured you. It was a very important point for us.

BURKETT: Yes. And I simply threw out a name. That was basically, I guess, to take a little pressure off for a moment.

RATHER: Have you forged anything?

BURKETT: No, sir.

RATHER: He you faked anything?

BURKETT: No, sir.

RATHER: But you did mislead us.

BURKETT: Yes, I misled.

RATHER: You lied to us.

BURKETT: Yes, I did.

RATHER: Now, if you would misled us about that, which is critical, why would I or anyone believe that you wouldn’t mislead us about something else?

BURKETT: I could understand that question. I can’T… that’s going to have to be your judgment and anybody else’s.

RATHER: Burkett still insists the documents are real, but now says he was in no position to verify them.

BURKETT: I also insisted when I sat down with your staff in the first face-to-face session, before I gave up any documents, I wanted to know what you were going to do with them, and I insisted that they be authenticated.

RATHER: The failure of CBS News to do just that, to properly scrutinize the documents and their source, led to errors in our reporting. CBS News deeply regrets it. Also I want to say personally and directly, I’m sorry. CBS News President Andrew Heyward has ordered an investigation to examine the process by which the report was prepared. It will be made public. This was an error made in good faith as we try to carry on the CBS News tradition of asking tough questions and investigating reports. But it was a mistake.

Now, some reaction to our revelations today. It comes from a spokesman for President Bush, Scott McClellan.

SCOTT McCLELLAN (White House Spokesman): Obviously there are still a number of questions that need to be answered, and we look forward to seeing the results of the investigations that other media organizations have undertaken, and that CBS says that they are now undertaking. We appreciate the fact that they have said they deeply regret it, but we still want to see those questions answered.

RATHER: And Scott McClellan repeated the the White House insistence that President Bush fulfilled his obligation to the National Guard and he was honorably discharged.

***

Draw your own conclusions.



Posted by Michele at September 20, 2004 06:55 PM | TrackBack
Comments

“The documents were provided to CBS news by a former commander in the Texas National Guard, Bill Burkett. Burkett is well known in National Guard circles for a long battle over his medical benefits, and for trying, for several years now, to discredit President Bush’s military service record.”

THESE are the “unimpeachable sources?” I had to read this thing through twice before I realized it was not a Scrappleface-type joke.

Thanks for posting this - now I don’t have to watch Dan tonight.

Posted by: samuelv [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 20, 2004 07:12 PM

now I don’t have to watch Dan tonight.

Why would you think you have to watch him at all?

Posted by: gus3 [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 20, 2004 07:15 PM

Where’s the apology to President Bush?

Damn. I wish, instead, halfway through the playactin..er…falling on swords…er… INTERVIEW (yeah, that’s the ticket, INTERVIEW) the Feds had showed up to perp-walk Dannyboy and BonkersBurkett to lockup.

Posted by: Darleen [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 20, 2004 08:17 PM

Not enough. Two days ago they said ‘unimpeachable’….I guess they’ve been PEACHED huh. My guess is Mary Beth Cahill is involved in this along with that scumbag Cleland..(using Teresa’s favorite line… ha ha).

Keep the pressure up people. Partisans have lied…partisans are lying now….how can anyone doubt a big lib like Rather didn’t know what he was trying to put forward to the American people. He is a shameless old man.

Posted by: dickmr [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 20, 2004 09:07 PM

I watched the airing and something Dan Rather said is not in this transcript (or my eyes are very tired). He said, “Mr Burkett did not contact us, we contacted Mr Burkett.”

How did CBS find out about Mr. Burkett having documents that would “support” their story?

Posted by: JustWondering [TypeKey Profile Page] at September 21, 2004 12:10 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)