The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
August 27, 2004
| FBI Investigating Possible Israeli Spy in Pentagon [UPDATE 3]

Just breaking tonight…

CNN:

The FBI has evidence that a person who has been working at high levels in the Pentagon may be a spy for Israel, a senior official confirmed to CNN on Friday.

The suspect could have been in a position to influence Bush administration policy toward Iran and Iraq, the senior official said.

WaPo:

The FBI is investigating whether an aide to the Pentagon’s No. 3 official acted as a spy for Israel, giving the Jewish state classified materials about secret White House deliberations on Iran, two federal law enforcement officials said Friday.

No arrests have been made, said the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation is continuing.

The officials refused to identify the Pentagon employee who is under investigation, but said the person works in the office of Douglas J. Feith, the undersecretary of defense for policy at the Pentagon.

Updates:

Bloomberg News: Israel Denies Receiving Information From Pentagon Official:

“We categorically deny these allegations,” Israeli embassy spokesman David Siegel said in an interview. “They are completely false and outrageous.”

It looks like Lesely Stahl at CBS is the one who broke the story and has the most detailed report:

60 Minutes Correspondent Lesley Stahl reports the FBI believes it has “solid” evidence that the suspected mole supplied Israel with classified materials that include secret White House policy deliberations on Iran.

At the heart of the investigation are two people who work at The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington.

The FBI investigation, headed up by Dave Szady, has involved wiretaps, undercover surveillance and photography that CBS News was told document the passing of classified information from the mole, to the men at AIPAC, and on to the Israelis.

A reader just sent me these points transcribed from Stahl’s report:

  • The alleged spy works within the office of the Secretary of Defense.
  • He/she supplied Israel with classified materials that include secret White House policy deliberations on Iran.
  • He/she passed classified information to two men who work at AIPAC who passed it to Israel.
  • Is described as a trusted analyst at the Pentagon.
  • Turned over a Presidential directive on US policy towards Iran while it was in the draft phase when US policy makers were still debating the policy.
  • The analyst had ties to top Pentagopn officials Wolfowitz and Feith, and was assigned to a unit with the Defense Dept, wher he was helping develop the Pentagon’s Iraq policy.

Apparently this happened a while ago, but it’s just being reported today.

(AM Update)

From the NY Times:

In a statement released Friday night, the Pentagon said that the Department of Defense “has been cooperating fully with the Department of Justice on this matter for an extended period of time.”

“The investigation involves a single individual at D.O.D. at the desk officer level, who was not in a position to have significant influence over U.S. policy,” the statement continued. “Nor could a foreign power be in a position to influence U.S. policy through this individual. To the best of D.O.D.’s knowledge, the investigation does not target any other D.O.D. individuals.”

One United States official said that he did not know why the desk officer would have passed on the information and that he could not assess the potential damage. “He had a certain expertise and had access to things, but he wasn’t a policymaker,” the official said.

So far, there is no report as to who leaked the information, nor has anyone yet questioned the timing of the leak.



Posted by Michele at August 27, 2004 09:12 PM | TrackBack
Comments

This individual need not be in a position to influence policy decisions for there to be a problem. All this person needs to do is reflect current thinking and options in a real time manner. Israel has any number of other folks in a position to influence policy, when armed with that knowledge.

Posted by: Don [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2004 12:23 PM

Excuse me if I find it a tad suspicious that the CBS is “breaking” this news when the FBI is so “certain” but there is not arrest and no named suspects.

Posted by: Darleen [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 28, 2004 02:59 PM

The security clearance of the material was the lowest level of classification - Confidential.

The leakage of such material - if it actually happened - is not very serious.

In addition it has all the code words. Israel, neocons, Jews, AIPAC.

Now I ask you how bad is MOSSAD’s trade craft if they are using AIPAC as courriers? The MOSSAD is not known for such terminal stupidity.

This fails the laugh test.

My guess - a counter intel operation by Islamic moles in the CIA or FBI. Did you hear Mueller was ordering Islamic sensitivity training for the FBI?

Roger Simon and LGF have a much more detailed discussion wth urls for my above points.

—==—

Steal this sig:

There is a big difference between William Calley and John Kerry. William Calley is a proven war criminal. For John Kerry we only have his word as an officer and a gentleman.

What is the War Hero Afraid of?
Form 180. Release ALL the records.

The Ads: Video links

Posted by: M. Simon [TypeKey Profile Page] at August 29, 2004 12:36 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)