August 03, 2004
Kerry | Heinz Kerry: 4 More Years of Bush = "Four More Years Of Hell"
This from India’s Deepikaglobal / Reuters:
Discussing the war in Iraq, Heinz Kerry subtly questioned Republican President George W. Bush’s intellect, saying: “It’s vital for anyone with intelligence to acknowledge mistakes and change positions — hello.” When a Bush supporter with a bullhorn shouted “four more years” from the back of a large crowd packed into a downtown Milwaukee park, Heinz Kerry, who was introducing her husband, responded: “They want four more years of hell.” “Three more months!,” she declared, referring to the Nov. 2 presidential election.
Yeah … shove it!
Posted by Alan at August 3, 2004 12:05 AM
| TrackBack
At least she didn’t say “Fuck off”.
Posted by: Lakhim
at August 3, 2004 12:39 AM
Personally, I hope she keeps right on with her opinionated self!
Posted by: TexasGal
at August 3, 2004 12:48 AM
The really pathetic thing is, all Kerry himself could respond with was “I want to thank George Bush for sending the goons here tonight…”
Never mind the level of security at the DNC last week, for someone who isn’t even President.
Posted by: gus3
at August 3, 2004 02:12 AM
Actually, she’s hoping that she only has three more months of hearing Kerry whine, “I want to be president. I want to. I want to!” If that is not hell, I dunno what is.
Posted by: caribsea
at August 3, 2004 02:25 AM
So, let’s see Lakhim -
When a secret service agent, protecting Kerry, gets an f-bomb dropped on him, that is Ok and not worthy of repeat/media.
When Kerry gives an interview to Rolling Stone and drops 4 or 5 F-bombs, obviously setting a great example for the youth of the country, that is OK and not worthy of your mention.
Terera tells a reporter to shove it for simply asking for a clarification of an exact quote of hers because as she said in her fit of rage, “I didn’t say that” (a lie) , that is OK and she is entitled to speak her mind.
When the ballons get stuck and the DNC convention coordinator drops the F-bomb and a GD on live TV around the world, that is not worthy of your comment.
When democratic senators give Cheney a very disingenuous greeting (on a non-work picture day) a day after the DNC kicked off “Haliburton week” with their direct assistance, thereby directly assaulting Cheney’s integrity, a man who they have known and worked with for years and who they KNOW to be of the highest integrity and honor. When Cheney confronts the primary offender and he tried to brush it off he got exactly the reponse that was called for - it is known as firing over the bow to let someone know they stepped over the line! Somehow, that is worthy of your ire and is worthy of repeat!!!
You are a piece of work!
Posted by: I collect political items
at August 3, 2004 02:49 AM
She can’t have been in country when Clinton was pres then!
Chads
Posted by: Chads
at August 3, 2004 08:42 AM
What can you expect from inhuman monsters like Kerry who delight in the sadistic pain they inflict on murdered babies?
They create Hell daily?
Posted by: leaddog2
at August 3, 2004 09:07 AM
You figure a candidate’s wife matters?
Posted by: Don
at August 3, 2004 10:54 AM
Actually I do. The first lady is in a position of great moral authority in our country. Many Americans come to admire and respect this person.
there have been many first ladies who performed this task admirably. I thought, even as a young boy, that Jackie brought a lot of class to the role. I admire Both Barbara and Laura. Further I thought that Nancy Reagan was a strong character who worked to restore the status of the white house.
Hillary, as you know attempted to use her position to influence significant parts of the american scene but she was hardly the first. I recall Lady Bird Johnson also launching various agendas from her position as first lady.
so yes, I think the first lady matters. While I wouldn’t change my vote based on the person, in this case the first lady’s class and courage cement my support for GWB
Posted by: skip
at August 3, 2004 11:51 AM
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry
Married Senator John Kerry in 1995. She only took his name eighteen months ago (conveniently RIGHT before he started his bid for the Whitehouse!) and she is an “interesting” paradox of conflicts.
Maria Teresa Thiersten Simoes-Ferreira Heinz Kerry was born in Mozambique, the daughter of a Portuguese physician, was educated in Switzerland and South Africa. Fluent in five languages, she was working as a United Nations interpreter in Geneva in the mid-60s when she met a “handsome” young American, H. John Heinz, III, who worked at a bank in Geneva. He told her his family was “in the food business.”
They were married in 1966 and returned to Pittsburgh where his family ran the giant H.J. Heinz food company. He was elected to the US House of Representatives in 1971, and in 1976 he was elected to the first of three terms in the United States Senate. A Republican, he wrote a burning diatribe against some of the causes backed by young House member (John Kerry).
Several years later, in 1991, he was killed when his plane collided with a Sun Oil Company helicopter over a Philadelphia suburb. The senator, his pilot and copilot, and both of Sun’s helicopter pilots were killed. He was survived by his wife, Teresa, and their three young sons.
Four years later, having inherited Heinz’s $500 million fortune, she married Senator John Forbes Kerry, the liberal junior senator from Massachusetts. She became a registered Democrat and the process of her radicalization was set in motion. Heinz Kerry is not shy about telling people that she required Kerry to sign a prenuptial agreement before they were married. John Kerry may not have check writing privileges on the Heinz catsup and pickle fortune, but he is certainly a willing and uncomplaining beneficiary of it. A lot of hard-earned money, made through many years of hawking catsup, mustard, and pickles has fallen into the hands of two people who despise successful entrepreneurship and who believe in the confiscatory redistribution of wealth.
So how does Mrs. Heinz Kerry spend John Heinz’s money?
Just one example: According to the G2 Bulletin, an online intelligence newsletter of WorldNetDaily, in the years between 1995-2001 she gave more than $4 million to an organization called the Tides Foundation. And what does the Tides Foundation do with John Heinz’s money?
* They support numerous antiwar groups, including Ramsey Clark’s International Action Center. Clark has offered to defend Saddam Hussein when he’s tried.
* They support the Democratic Justice Fund, a joint venture of the Tides Foundation and billionaire hate-monger George Soros. The Democratic Justice Fund seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from “terrorist” states.
* They support the Council for American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are known to have close ties to the terrorist group, Hamas.
* They support the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt. He is the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
* They support the “Barrio Warriors,” a radical Hispanic group whose primary goal is to return all of Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas to Mexico.
These are but a few of the radical groups that benefit, through the anonymity provided by the Tides Foundation, from the generosity of our would-be first lady, the wealthy widow of Republican senator John Heinz, and now the wife of the Democratic senator who aspires to be the 44th President of the United States.
Aiding and supporting our enemies is not good for America, regardless of your political views.
For a look at The Tides Foundation, visit
http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/225
Posted by: DevilDoc
at August 3, 2004 12:12 PM
“You figure a candidate’s wife matters?”
“Behind every good man there’s a good woman”.
The italicized portion Posted by: Don at August 3, 2004 10:54 AM
Posted by: Cap'n DOC
at August 4, 2004 07:46 AM
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.