Nader | Nader Abandons Arizona
The Nader campaign has abandoned efforts to get Nader on the Arizona presidential ballot. According to the Associated Press, even though the Campaign submitted over 22,000 signatures the campaign was about 550 short of the 14,694 required “valid” signatures:
Two Democratic voters had filed a lawsuit last week, backed by the Arizona Democratic Party, questioning the validity of Nader’s nominating petitions and other documents. The Democrats argued that more than 70 percent of the signatures were invalid.
As a judge prepared to hear arguments in the case, the campaign said a review by the secretary of state’s office found that the campaign was about 550 signatures short of the number needed to get on the ballot.
“We withdrew after elections officials came out with us being 550 signatures short,” said Nader campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese. “There’s no question that deep-pocketed Democrats don’t have much of a sense of fair play.”
He said the campaign does not have the resources to fight the aggressive legal challenge.
From California Yankee.
Posted by Dan Spencer at July 2, 2004 02:06 PM
| TrackBack
You mean that the fact that the D’s (gasp!) Spent Money on challenging an invalid petition was Ba-ad?
It’s tough being a man of principles.
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.