The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
February 07, 2004
| Washington (State) Insider

Written by Adam Gessaman. Originally appeared at Idly.org. Reprinted with permission of the author.

Well, I went to my local caucus today.

When we showed up at Fairhaven Middle School at about 9:50, we found that the parking lot was largely full, and the gym was also apparently nearing its 999 person capacity. The crowd continued to flow in, and it became incredibly warm and crowded, until the Fire Marshall showed up to usher about 500-750200-300 people out of the gym into the hallways.

At 10:30 am, the chairman of the Whatcom County Democratic Party welcomed everyone, read the rules, and we got down to the serious business of caucusing. I was in a district that was predominantly college students with only a handful of older folks (mostly 50-75). The most of the older folks gave us that “damn kids who throw loud parties in my neighborhood” look at least once. At the outset, Dean had 15 supporters, Kerry 10, Kucinich 8, Clark 2, Edwards 2, and a handful of undecideds. So, the Precinct President (or whatever the hell his title was) sent all of the supporters for “non-viable” candidates over to talk about who they would support. At this point, a smarmy Edwards supporter who was decked out in full political attire (neatly pressed black pants and white shirt with gaudy flag tie and flag pin) managed to swing three undecideds to Edwards, thus giving him 15% and a delegate. Basically, it could have gone down two ways:


  1. He swings three or more supporters and gets a delegate the honest way or

  2. He convinces the undecideds and un-viables to elect an undecided delegate (which he would promote himself for) and thereby Edwards would get a vote anyway.

Essentially, Edwards was border-line viable in our precinct and any of the other ones I observed. The eventual break-down of the delegates in my precinct (55) went like this:


  • 3 for Dean

  • 2 for Kerry

  • 1 for Kucinich

  • 1 for Edwards

Via an anonymous source, I was told that insider polling suggests, somewhat consistent with my own experience, that Kerry took 28.05% to Dean’s 22.09% state-wide as of 12:56 PM (162 of 604 locations reporting, 1460 of 6545 precincts). The numbers are still rolling in from my source as they are updated, so I will update this post as I get them. I saw what I would estimate support at about 30% for both Dean and Kerry, with Kucinich supporters being a very vocal — and more than a bit scary — minority. Clark’s decision to by-pass Washington led to a very small minority showing up to support him, so I would be surprised if he was even viable in most precincts.

Overall, it was an enjoyable foray into the political process, but I should note that I now understand why so many people are hesitant to enter into politics — it was loud, rather disorganized and highly-charged in that gym. If I was’t driven to be active in the ouster of President Bush, I would have had second thoughts about walking into that zoo.

washc.jpg

The hallway outside the gym was full of caucus-goers



Posted by Michele at February 7, 2004 08:48 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Ouster, love that world. Brings back so many memories of third world nations…

Posted by: FH at February 7, 2004 10:58 PM

I always liked ‘palace coup’ and maybe some references to ‘proxie warlords’.

Yes, let’s throw the rascal out. Let’s do al Qaeda’s bidding and pin the target back on the country. What we need after the next attack is a couple years of soul searching (where have we gone wrong? how have we failed to delight others? Can my VW run on soy? Oh why do they hate so, see? I’ve wet myself again.)

Posted by: torpedo_eight at February 8, 2004 10:37 AM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)