February 05, 2004
Bush | November's Battleground States
I’ve posted a chart on my blog that combines Bush’s 2000 state-by-state margins of victory (or defeat) with the number of electors at stake in 2004 to produce a ranking of which states promise to be the principal battlegrounds this fall. You can go here for the full post explaining how I computed the factors in the chart and some thoughts on what this means for a Bush/Kerry race. Here are the top 20 battleground states:
| State | Margin (%) | Electors | Factor |
| Florida | 0.009 | 27 | 33293159.23 |
| New Mexico | -0.06 | 5 | 133748.37 |
| Wisconsin | -0.2 | 10 | 20725.89 |
| Iowa | -0.3 | 7 | 7042.23 |
| Oregon | -0.4 | 7 | 3583.08 |
| New Hampshire | 1.3 | 4 | 248.00 |
| Minnesota | -2.4 | 10 | 173.15 |
| Ohio | 3.5 | 20 | 159.05 |
| Pennsylvania | -4.2 | 21 | 120.76 |
| Missouri | 3.3 | 11 | 98.69 |
| Tennessee | 3.9 | 11 | 73.63 |
| Michigan | -5.1 | 17 | 64.51 |
| California | -11.8 | 55 | 39.51 |
| Nevada | 3.6 | 5 | 39.32 |
| Washington | -5.6 | 11 | 35.33 |
| Arizona | 6.3 | 10 | 25.30 |
| Arkansas | 5.4 | 6 | 20.25 |
| Virginia | 8.0 | 13 | 20.08 |
| Maine | -5.1 | 4 | 15.29 |
| Louisiana | 7.7 | 9 | 15.28 |
Posted by Baseball Crank at February 5, 2004 09:28 AM
| TrackBack
One problem with relying on the 2000 results is that the demographics have changed somewhat, in some places. Florida for example is now leaning towards Bush. (Governor Bush won reelection by a wide margin in 2002.)
The absense of a strongish 3rd party candidate, and the fact that the Democrat is not the incumbent’s VP will change the dynamic a lot too.
On my blog, I’ve been following the speculators at the tradesports.com site who vote with their money. Based on that, it looks like the really close races will be in Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Posted by: Tim Shell at February 6, 2004 11:20 PM
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)
As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.
We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.
We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.
If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.