![]() |
|
2004 US Presidential Election
January 28, 2004
| Tracking the Reactions
Courtesy of Glenn Reynolds, a look at the reaction to Kerry’s New Hampshire win from blog pundits [for more reactions, see the comments on Reynolds’ post]:
Glenn makes a few more comments on the subject and has more useful links as well. Posted by Michele at January 28, 2004 06:53 AM | TrackBack Comments
Much ado about nothing. Kerry wins two states worth 11 electoral votes and everyone crowns him unbeatable. Has he won a Southern State yet? Hecj, 60% of the voters in N.H. didn’t pick him and last I look N.H. is a “red” state. If the turnout for the primary is any indicator, N.H. remains a red state. Remember we elect our President based on the Electoral College not the popoular vote. Kerry hasn’t shown he can compete for the Presidency nor does he have this nomination won. In fact despite his two wins, he’s behind in the delegate count. Posted by: Stan Golaboff at January 28, 2004 03:39 PM The “Rudy” syndrome that has infected this race has become unbearable to watch. What is Dennis Kucinich still doing in this race at barely 1% The man looks like a mortician and is about as entertaining as a 12 hour tax seminar. Obviously the man is positioning himself as the next Nader, and will probably cost the Democratic nominee precious votes if this election turns out to be like 2000. Joe “Loserman” your days of campaigning ended back in 2000. Get out! Clark-sit and wait for the Defense Secretary position should November go our way. Sharpton-at least brings color to the debates-no pun intended. And Kerry-do the Democrats remember what happen to the last boring nominee to go against Bush? Don’t blame the supreme court-nader pulled 5% of the national vote. Somebody needs to get Clinton of his memoirs to seriously endorse a canidate who can actually contrast this president if not in policy at least in electibility-Edwards v. Bush could be a repeat of ‘92. Posted by: Michael Newling at February 2, 2004 02:42 PM The “Rudy” syndrome that has infected this race has become unbearable to watch. What is Dennis Kucinich still doing in this race at barely 1% The man looks like a mortician and is about as entertaining as a 12 hour tax seminar. Obviously the man is positioning himself as the next Nader, and will probably cost the Democratic nominee precious votes if this election turns out to be like 2000. Joe “Loserman” your days of campaigning ended back in 2000. Get out! Clark-sit and wait for the Defense Secretary position should November go our way. Sharpton-at least brings color to the debates-no pun intended. And Kerry-do the Democrats remember what happen to the last boring nominee to go against Bush? Don’t blame the supreme court-nader pulled 5% of the national vote. Somebody needs to get Clinton of his memoirs to seriously endorse a canidate who can actually contrast this president if not in policy at least in electibility-Edwards v. Bush could be a repeat of ‘92. Posted by: Michael Newling at February 2, 2004 02:42 PM Post a comment
Thanks for signing in,
.
Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.) |