The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
« Record Voter Turnout Expected In New Hampshire | Main | Judgment Day ... for Pollsters and the Press »
January 27, 2004
Command Post 2004 Polls | Clark Takes Commanding Lead in NH Primary!

Well, okay, as of 1:11AM EST out of 24 Democratic Primary votes cast in Dixville Notch and Harts Location, Wesley Clark took 14 (58%), Kerry takes 8 (33%) Dean and Edwards both tie at 4 (17% each), Lieberman takes 1 (4%), while Kucinich and Sharpton draw a goose egg. It’s gonna be a long day. Go get some sleep, why don’t ‘cha?

(Numbers from The Concord Monitor)



Posted by John2 at January 27, 2004 01:10 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Peggy Noonan says: Democrats, for the good of the country: Stop Wesley Clark!

And so my Democratic friends, patriots who vote Democratic and are voting in today’s primary and the ones down the road. Please. We will take Joe Lieberman or John Kerry or even young John Edwards, men who appear to be somewhere in the normal range. We need a person who could rally the nation on a terrible day, and who could arguably meet the security demands the age requires. We can’t afford flip-outs, or people who are too obviously creepy. Just a person in the normal range. Is that asking too much?

Ouch.

Posted by: lewy14 at January 27, 2004 05:32 AM

Hey Peggy…
compare Clark and GWB resumes. especially the part about the prancing deserter/draft dodger. If Reagan’s go-to-gal is against him, he may be just the ticket for the Ds.

Posted by: carl at January 27, 2004 01:05 PM

Carl,

Any facts in that screed?

Posted by: jones at January 27, 2004 01:10 PM

truly a screed, an informal piece of writing…opinionated at that.

Clark - NATO Commander; can order breakfast in Bosnia
Bush - National Guard instead of Vietnam; see also www.awolbush.com; “Bring ‘Em On”—my boys can beat yours any day.

Clark and supporter’s comments on Bush treatment of military and playing TopGun…Dukakis moment—“Mission Accomplished” photo opportunity. GWB just didn’t have the stupid helmet.

opinion—what is the meaning of the R base already dishing dirt on Clark?

But suspect all this was already known…the question strikes me as the kind of QED seen regularly on FoxNews

Any facts that belie?

Posted by: carl at January 27, 2004 04:47 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)