The Command Post
2004 US Presidential Election
« Poll Position 1/23 | Main | It's Never A Good Sign ... »
January 23, 2004
| New Hampshire Primary Links

A very informative web page covering the New Hampshire Primary and the presidential candidates has been put together by Foster’s Daily Democrat (Dover, NH). Here’s a sample of some of the headlines presently listed there:

Lieberman says Saddam himself was a weapon of mass destruction
MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) — Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman says President Bush didn’t have to claim Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war with Iraq.

Presidential polls in New Hampshire

Clark: GOP agenda at play in New Hampshire debate
NASHUA, N.H. (AP) — Presidential candidate Wesley Clark on Friday complained that one of the moderators in Thursday night’s debate was carrying out a Republican agenda by questioning his Democratic credentials.

Edwards denounces ‘war profiteers’
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — John Edwards denounced “war profiteers” Friday that are winning contracts for work in Iraq even as they continue making political contributions to the well-connected in Washington.

Giuliani and Pataki head to New Hampshire



Posted by DCE at January 23, 2004 08:32 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (Click here should you choose to sign out.)

As you post your comment, please mind our simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. We also ask that you avoid the extensive use of profanity, racist terms (neither of which we consider civil or respectful), and other boorish language.

We reserve the right to delete any comment, and to prohibit you from commenting on this site, if we feel you have broached this policy. As a courtesy, we will first send you an email noting a violation so you understand the boundaries. This will occur only once, however, and should we ban you from our comment forums we expect that ban to be permanent.

We also will frown upon those who suggest that we ban other individuals for voicing unpopular opinions, should those opinions be voiced in a civil and respectful manner. The point of our comment threads is to provide a forum for spirited though civil and respectful discourse … it is not to provide a forum in which everyone will agree with your point of view.

If you can live by these rules, welcome aboard. If not, then we’re sorry it didn’t work out, and thanks for visiting The Command Post.


Remember me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)